General Discussion

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

27. and still you do not address the issue of GROSSLY inappropriate. a grown fuckin man

Reply to Nine (Reply #23)

Fri Feb 7, 2014, 09:40 PM

Feb 2014

with HIS child. GROSSLY inappropriate.

has those words even registered yet?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

last thread needed about woody allen and his daughter [View all] roguevalley Feb 2014 OP

facts of the decision. liberals like facts. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #1

This is a fairly strongly worded opinion Gothmog Feb 2014 #2

his behavior grossly inappropriate and measure must be taken to protect her. seabeyond Feb 2014 #3

That is incorrect. I don't think YOU read it. Nine Feb 2014 #8

sounds to me like i am not wrong.... seabeyond Feb 2014 #10

Your own link states that Allen was allowed supervised visitation with Satchel. Nine Feb 2014 #13

I was referring to Dylan. Not the other two children. They are not the subject at hand seabeyond Feb 2014 #17

And I posted what the ruling said about Dylan. Nine Feb 2014 #22

"possible future contact between Mr. Allen and Dylan"... that would be a maybe. seabeyond Feb 2014 #24

but regardless nine, of trying to pick out shit to argue. do tell us how good a man this allen was seabeyond Feb 2014 #26

I doubt anyone said the family court "proved guilt" BainsBane Feb 2014 #12

"the verdict came in, just wasnt thru a trial" Nine Feb 2014 #14

Okay, but I think it's mistaken to take that literally BainsBane Feb 2014 #15

that would be the whole point of saying it did not go to trial, that it was the judge seabeyond Feb 2014 #18

given that he said it he would then be required to show proof. he didnt because it didnt exist. if roguevalley Feb 2014 #71

being denied even supervised visitation treestar Feb 2014 #65

kick gollygee Feb 2014 #4

Isn't it, though? It's also the only one that doesn't boil down to a statement of Squinch Feb 2014 #30

The link in the OP is well worth reading in its entirety. Z_I_Peevey Feb 2014 #5

Totally refutes the publicists account that has been regurgitated around here like gospel BainsBane Feb 2014 #6

"Ms. Farrow's chief shortcoming in regard to parenting" BainsBane Feb 2014 #7

People Magazine? As opposed to Vanity Fair? (nt) Nine Feb 2014 #23

Dylan's letter was in the New York Times. BainsBane Feb 2014 #25

and still you do not address the issue of GROSSLY inappropriate. a grown fuckin man seabeyond Feb 2014 #27

That's one person's opinion. Nine Feb 2014 #34

wow. just wow. at the expense of a child. truly, fuckin amazing seabeyond Feb 2014 #35

sorry, your view is no more valid than anyone else. kwassa Feb 2014 #38

The judge presents a "Finding of Fact" BainsBane Feb 2014 #44

The judge presents a finding of HIS facts. kwassa Feb 2014 #66

no.just no. roguevalley Feb 2014 #72

Now, that is a substantive response. kwassa Feb 2014 #77

That the team refused to testify means their finds are not evidence BainsBane Feb 2014 #79

What professional standards are you talking about? kwassa Feb 2014 #83

Did you read the ruling? It does not appear so BainsBane Feb 2014 #85

I think that both of them have dubious ethical standards. kwassa Feb 2014 #94

So I will summarize BainsBane Feb 2014 #95

"What she did to their wives was done to her by Woody Allen". Uh, no. R B Garr Feb 2014 #96

It's interesting BainsBane Feb 2014 #98

No, it's not believable at all. They seem to be very invested in their positions R B Garr Feb 2014 #100

+1 n/t Z_I_Peevey Feb 2014 #102

Thank you BainsBane Feb 2014 #103

That your reply came about 10 seconds after I posted shows me you didn't even read past the title. Nine Feb 2014 #39

Lies harm children too. RichGirl Feb 2014 #64

Your rapidly changing story BainsBane Feb 2014 #41

"Something you previously insisted was not so" Nine Feb 2014 #61

The Yale New Haven team REFUSED to testify BainsBane Feb 2014 #43

You seem determined chervilant Feb 2014 #53

Kick redqueen Feb 2014 #9

k&r Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #11

K & R thucythucy Feb 2014 #16

Kick Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #19

Thank you for posting this LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #20

You and me both - SO much worse than I had even thought TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #47

Money, fame, power LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #68

That is pretty damning. nt el_bryanto Feb 2014 #21

I'm glad he did not get custody. bravenak Feb 2014 #28

absolutely. or visitation. measures to protect dylan. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #29

It sounds like he was very inappropriate. bravenak Feb 2014 #31

that was even "a possibility". i do not know if he eventually got them or not. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #32

The court document gives the events of the day Dylan says she was abused BainsBane Feb 2014 #33

i didnt know there was more, than what was on the link. jumping back in seabeyond Feb 2014 #36

it is at the link TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #48

Me too. Why was she able to keep a license? BainsBane Feb 2014 #51

and why did they destroy their notes??? TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #59

I want to know this, too! cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #67

the lead a man, two women therapist. seabeyond Feb 2014 #69

You're "still reading the rest"?! Nine Feb 2014 #37

I'm also writing a report BainsBane Feb 2014 #40

after reading it all, i conclude with. even stuebenville rape on video had way too many people seabeyond Feb 2014 #42

and even when they finally admit to what happened they blame the victim JI7 Feb 2014 #45

Now it's "the court ruling is just an opinion" BainsBane Feb 2014 #46

+1 -- Thank you chervilant Feb 2014 #56

the extent to justify grossly inappropriate behavior while measure must be taken to protect a dylan seabeyond Feb 2014 #87

It is harsh laundry_queen Feb 2014 #55

+ a gazillion! chervilant Feb 2014 #57

Clearly the judge believed Allen a danger to Dylan BainsBane Feb 2014 #99

thanks rv.. from your link.. Cha Feb 2014 #49

If you read thee whole ruling BainsBane Feb 2014 #50

Thanks BB.. I have read most of those heartbreaking details in Cha Feb 2014 #52

The court record actually confirms Allen's account that he didn't act as a father BainsBane Feb 2014 #54

Right.. just because you're Cha Feb 2014 #58

he used an assumed name to call her and she had to leave a camp because of it roguevalley Feb 2014 #73

Yes BainsBane Feb 2014 #86

Oh dear, how to explain this: Bonobo Feb 2014 #60

nice try roguevalley Feb 2014 #75

Very enlightening. Thanks for posting this, roguevalley. nt DLevine Feb 2014 #62

you are welcome roguevalley Feb 2014 #76

What I don't understand is cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #63

To get back at Mia BainsBane Feb 2014 #88

I am hoping that is not the case cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #89

kinda what the judge called him. dylan made the accusation. the doctor called woody and seabeyond Feb 2014 #90

I suspect the judge made the right decision here cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #92

Woody Allen did not sue for custody of Dylan Farrow until after her accusations were made known Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #70

in your face obvious good point. no desire for custody until AFTER the molestation accusation seabeyond Feb 2014 #80

You're very welcome. There have been a few well sourced OP's but Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #81

K&R me b zola Feb 2014 #74

Sadly it wasn't dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #78

Unfortunately there are WAY TOO MANY people here engaging in faux-news type spin and mendacity. redqueen Feb 2014 #91

yes. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #93

Suddenly facts no longer matter BainsBane Feb 2014 #97

I just don't get it. I just. don't. get it. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #104

Read the actual judge's finding BainsBane Feb 2014 #105

The new game is the old game BainsBane Feb 2014 #82

Full legal finding of fact BainsBane Feb 2014 #84

... ScreamingMeemie Feb 2014 #101