Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Transporting Oil: Pipeline or Railway? [View all]Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)39. That is what I was hoping to hear
We can't do anything right now about the Keystone crap. But if it's to be sent by rail, then we can hopefully be more motivated to do some positive things for our infrastructure.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK, but did you know that almost all the tanker cars being used constitute a hazard?
cali
Feb 2014
#16
Sounds like a reason to upgrade the infrastructure, add lots of inspectors and check stations, and
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#27
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I could swear that Canada has a national infrastructure,
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#5
Here's the problem with this whole "Don't worry, we'll fix it later" fantasy.
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#31
Because the First Nations people in Canada are putting up more of a fight than farmers in the US.
LeftyMom
Feb 2014
#18