General Discussion

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

154. it isnt. what was the purpose? what was her reasoning. what are you arguing making this

Sat Feb 8, 2014, 03:00 PM

Feb 2014

statement.

i often took my kids for an icecream for all kinds of reasons. all kinds. rewards. to sit and talk and allow them to express. just for fun. because they got a shot. all kinds of reasons.

why did she take her for icecream, and how is that relevant for you?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

333 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Woody Allen Speaks Out [View all] B2G Feb 2014 OP

Woody, this says it all: Botany Feb 2014 #1

"a young lady who had been in the role as your daughter" Major Nikon Feb 2014 #4

She was in her teens and was the daughter of the woman Woody was in a relationship w/. Botany Feb 2014 #7

She was 20 and was a sophomore in college Major Nikon Feb 2014 #20

holy frank sinatra shit d_b Feb 2014 #66

I know!!!! FarPoint Feb 2014 #246

+1000 !!!! orpupilofnature57 Feb 2014 #274

Mia Farrow is not accused of committing a major sexual assault against a child. CTyankee Feb 2014 #309

Obviously Major Nikon Feb 2014 #312

Isn't the title of this post descriptive of the charge of child molestation? CTyankee Feb 2014 #319

Whoever quotes Wikipedia first, loses the argument. Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #21

She was never just a girlfriend, she is his babies' mother. reusrename Feb 2014 #84

Wrong. Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #121

over a decade together. oldest at 9 or 10 when it all starts. vacations to europe as a family unit seabeyond Feb 2014 #125

They certainly were a family unit Crunchy Frog Feb 2014 #213

They were not doing that.... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #287

Right, she met him at a frat party in college and they started dating... CTyankee Feb 2014 #310

Nothing about their relationship was normal Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #311

So do you think Woody took up with Soon Yi because Mia was pregnant, not by him, CTyankee Feb 2014 #317

Not at all... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #322

But surely you have read the problems with that report, what the judge did that would lead one to CTyankee Feb 2014 #328

Let's unpack this... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #330

unpack further CTyankee Feb 2014 #331

We're getting nowhere... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #332

Again, there has been pushback against all of this and there are competing lines of thought... CTyankee Feb 2014 #333

It is of interest in our household that this whole truedelphi Feb 2014 #252

who do you think that is? CTyankee Feb 2014 #320

They were not married, but they Crunchy Frog Feb 2014 #169

They were a family unit insofar as WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #247

I suspect it happens a lot more than we know, as well WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #244

Seriously, has she never heard of cameras? seaglass Feb 2014 #18

Allen had children with Mia Major Nikon Feb 2014 #26

She's a liar if the quote you included was direct. seaglass Feb 2014 #28

since so many people want to make them involved as family or romantic partners back then�. KittyWampus Feb 2014 #38

he did not pay attention to the kids but mostly dylan, than later moses casually, seabeyond Feb 2014 #42

I have not weighed in on this subject before, but I did read that Mia asked Woody to tblue37 Feb 2014 #218

One would have to reach pretty far to come up with that Major Nikon Feb 2014 #58

it was a family unit. vacations to europe, vacations to connecticut summer home. seabeyond Feb 2014 #60

A "family unit" that consisted of other fathers, nannies and a dozen or so kids Major Nikon Feb 2014 #74

Best to leave the adopted children of your lover and mother of your children alone,wouldn't you say? boston bean Feb 2014 #78

I don't think I'd do it Major Nikon Feb 2014 #83

I'll make a judgment based on the facts that he fucked around with boston bean Feb 2014 #85

beyond angry someone telling me i do not know whether i would cheat on my mate with her child. seabeyond Feb 2014 #94

And what does that fact tell you exactly? Major Nikon Feb 2014 #96

two separate issues here major, on allens character. soon yi shows what a piece of shit the man is seabeyond Feb 2014 #98

So why ignore all the shit about Farrow? Major Nikon Feb 2014 #104

wtf? i do not give a shit about mia. she did not molest dylan. allen did. focus.... seabeyond Feb 2014 #108

You obviously haven't read his actual ruling WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #251

There was no witch hunt, and you are misrepresenting the prosecutor: Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #258

I didn't even mention the prosecutor WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #262

The judge was clear regarding the civil case, you don't need caps. The prosecutor Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #280

That he has problems. boston bean Feb 2014 #110

You mean judgment, not reasoning Major Nikon Feb 2014 #120

I'll decide for myself. I'm pretty sure most would find it extremely boston bean Feb 2014 #127

Believe whatever you want about it Major Nikon Feb 2014 #131

I did bring it up in context. boston bean Feb 2014 #134

you do not think you would? you do not think the rest would not know? i damn well KNOW seabeyond Feb 2014 #92

It is exactly about what consenting adults are doing Major Nikon Feb 2014 #102

you can justify stepping over boundaries, purposely hurting loved one all you want. seabeyond Feb 2014 #109

You didn't answer the question Major Nikon Feb 2014 #122

no. i refuse the derailing to take t to other people in the scenario. you are right. it is a ploy seabeyond Feb 2014 #128

So why even mention Soon Yi if you are ignoring everything else? Major Nikon Feb 2014 #130

because there was a subthread, presenting it as a nonfamily unit. which is incorrect. seabeyond Feb 2014 #133

Call it whatever you want Major Nikon Feb 2014 #149

She made a specific statement about the nature of her relationship with Woody which turns out to be seaglass Feb 2014 #79

It's obvious she means "alone" together WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #249

Not parsing, I am literally reading what she said. You're the one adding words and interpreting seaglass Feb 2014 #265

Uh, yeah, when she was nineteen WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #270

Wow - you are really invested in this. No need to get nasty. And that ends my interest seaglass Feb 2014 #273

Look, my apologies�please hear me out for a moment WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #278

Apology accepted. seaglass Feb 2014 #294

This message was self-deleted by its author WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #275

thank you Botany Feb 2014 #36

Why? Who the heck are you to dictate who can or can't take up a relationship? KittyWampus Feb 2014 #40

a family unit. sisters and brothers. dating a woman and cheating with the daughter. a destruction seabeyond Feb 2014 #43

Simple Rule Botany Feb 2014 #47

It is a pretty simple rule laundry_queen Feb 2014 #173

There is never a good time to start f***ing your partner's children and .... Botany Feb 2014 #176

yep. laundry_queen Feb 2014 #190

You are so right about this Generic Other Feb 2014 #313

So, if you adopted a daughter, at age of 8 got divorced from the man boston bean Feb 2014 #72

And yet he can't understand tavernier Feb 2014 #184

Sexual predators spend years grooming their victims. Z_I_Peevey Feb 2014 #55

and knowing this, yes. he stated she was in the background, yet he noticed her seabeyond Feb 2014 #59

I find it interesting that I haven't seen a lot of comments cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #103

Anna Salters's popular and scholarly works, including this book, Z_I_Peevey Feb 2014 #118

Thank you very much!! cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #123

So now, Soon-Yi, in her forties, is the victim of a sexual predator? WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #257

Seriously? Have you taken a survey? WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #272

They had a very unconventional relationship... RichGirl Feb 2014 #6

Categorically FALSE> it is beyond reason that so many DU"ers insist on repeating this lie. KittyWampus Feb 2014 #33

Didn't Sandusky deny being chervilant Feb 2014 #2

Dozens of his alleged victims spoke up. With Woody, only one alleged victim spoke up. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #10

IMHO, the only thing worse chervilant Feb 2014 #35

That's not even an argument Scootaloo Feb 2014 #197

It was part of a larger argument DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #281

Yes, whenever these cases come up, that is always truedelphi Feb 2014 #255

There were actual witnesses vankuria Feb 2014 #44

so the victim is to be believed ONLY when someone sees the pervert in the act of abuse? even then seabeyond Feb 2014 #48

I was only trying vankuria Feb 2014 #81

That's not an accurate account: Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #90

the point. a witness saw a rape in sandusky case, but... first one, was ignored and many rapes seabeyond Feb 2014 #97

"More than enough evidence" vankuria Feb 2014 #112

the judge stated allen's behavior was grossly inappropriate and measures to protect dylan seabeyond Feb 2014 #115

+100 nt LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #136

While the judge did state vankuria Feb 2014 #137

really...? and a decade and half later in all our progession, calif, montana, canada, seabeyond Feb 2014 #138

I assume you do not believe the findings of ... Vinnie From Indy Feb 2014 #143

nor did the judge, read his account, and why he stated they were not credible. my post addressing seabeyond Feb 2014 #145

The judge did not say the group was not credible Major Nikon Feb 2014 #162

The Yale New Haven study report is "sanitized and, therefore, less credible" owing to a variety of f seabeyond Feb 2014 #164

I read it and nowhere does it say "not credible" Major Nikon Feb 2014 #166

less credible.... really major? they fucked up and judge did not believe what they handed over. seabeyond Feb 2014 #167

The judge didn't say that either Major Nikon Feb 2014 #168

you can nit pick a word major in an effort to create an illusion the report was valid. seabeyond Feb 2014 #171

It wasn't ignored Major Nikon Feb 2014 #185

people can go in and read. i am not hunting thru the pages again. Harvard report was not credible seabeyond Feb 2014 #186

Why should anyone look for an explanation for something that was never claimed? Major Nikon Feb 2014 #198

Valid according only to the judge. kwassa Feb 2014 #195

wrong. many in the field at the time expressed the concern harvard handled it in that manner. seabeyond Feb 2014 #202

nothing in the court documents. no links. Major Nikon Feb 2014 #212

Again, I would not presume to pass judgment on this case without knowing what tblue37 Feb 2014 #238

The judge said the report was "less credible" because he didn't have their notes Major Nikon Feb 2014 #245

The language from the judge is strong enough to cause me to doubt this report Gothmog Feb 2014 #324

... Major Nikon Feb 2014 #326

I was asking about the full opinion from the child abuse case in Ct. Gothmog Feb 2014 #327

The judge did not find the information to be credible. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #146

Virtually all child abusers deny chervilant Feb 2014 #49

look, he may or may not have done it, but the Yale team was clear that they didn't think he had cali Feb 2014 #51

what if two out of three thought he had? but the one that did not examine dylan, seabeyond Feb 2014 #61

well, the adopted son he molested wasn't his "real" son and was elehhhhna Feb 2014 #192

Of course he denied it WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #260

Here's the statement chervilant Feb 2014 #3

I love kids... RichGirl Feb 2014 #8

If someone accused you of abuse, would you think it might be true? Democat Feb 2014 #12

Would you? chervilant Feb 2014 #23

All abusers deny it jberryhill Feb 2014 #126

I find it tiresome chervilant Feb 2014 #232

I also find it tiresome TM99 Feb 2014 #293

Well, then, we're in luck! chervilant Feb 2014 #298

Please read Ney's book. TM99 Feb 2014 #304

I fully intend to read Ney's book. chervilant Feb 2014 #306

it was not like he had not have a handful of years of mia, therapist telling him his behavior seabeyond Feb 2014 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #182

How is the library today? hrmjustin Feb 2014 #183

This looks like trash to me... Walk away Feb 2014 #5

Woody Allen is a sexual pervert. Of course, he denies it. boston bean Feb 2014 #9

That's great logic there. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #11

He was accused, therefore he is guilty, it's his job to prove he's innocent Democat Feb 2014 #13

I read the 32 page report DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #17

2-3% false rape. 100% lie about being pedophiles. yet, you choose to believe the 100% seabeyond Feb 2014 #19

It wasn't directed toward me DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #25

today, ya, he might have been, except being celebrity, probably not. 3% of rapist actually seabeyond Feb 2014 #30

I really don't know if he did it or not. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #37

post 48. as with polanski, sandusky, steubenville with video... people still stand up for the rapist seabeyond Feb 2014 #52

Given the totality of circumstances I had no problem believing Polanski and Sandusky were guilty. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #57

more children had to be raped because ONE witness was not enough. what a decade of more rapes? seabeyond Feb 2014 #65

Of course one sexual assault of a minor is one sexual assault too much... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #75

the point is. sandusky, there was an eye witness to rape. it was ignored for a decade allowing seabeyond Feb 2014 #87

And a credible investigation by Yale New Haven Hospital that suggested the charges are unfounded DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #99

The judge did not find the Yale team to be credible. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #101

Yet the District Attorney didn't file charges with the information on hand DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #105

I am not talking about my opinion, the prosecutor did not go forward, he stated, Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #111

Let me understand this DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #116

There was no due process because a decision was made not to go forward Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #124

There's a lot of space between "probable cause" and "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt". DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #135

A prosecutor has the discretion to go forward or not..you may not agree but Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #140

"The evidence suggests it is unlikely he (Allen) he could be successfully prosecuted for sexual ... kwassa Feb 2014 #219

He was all in for Mia?? Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #222

I read all 30 pages of the opinion. Did you? kwassa Feb 2014 #229

Yes, and? Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #230

The judge was clearly wildly in favor of Mia, and opposed to Woody, kwassa Feb 2014 #234

Not in isolation, no..that is not accurate. Your interpretation of the judge Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #236

My interpretation is a direct quote from the judge. Try again. kwassa Feb 2014 #239

Don't lecture me, you are stretching..I read all of it, and you are Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #241

My analysis is correct, and you know it is. kwassa Feb 2014 #256

Mia named one of her kids after the judge...I think she saw him on her side, too. nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #299

Hiuh? You have any documentation for that, please post it. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #300

Did the Google break? Go check for yourself how many of Mia's kids have "Wilk" in their names. nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #301

You're rude. You make a claim, post the link..it's a simple courtesy. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #302

Yeah...still waiting for you to cite post 146. So...since you've googled and found out that looney msanthrope Feb 2014 #303

Are you playing a game here? That looney tune Farrow...I see you have issues with Mia. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #305

no. they were protecting the child. and they could protect her, without going to court seabeyond Feb 2014 #114

no. it was not credible. the judges point. three people. no notes kept for the seabeyond Feb 2014 #106

The opinion of a family court judge is not dispositive in a criminal matter DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #113

ya. steubenville had a video and they decided there was not enough to prosecute. which brings seabeyond Feb 2014 #117

Allen lost his bid to have the states attorney disciplined boston bean Feb 2014 #139

Folks are free to hold any opinions they want. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #172

The opinion of the judge was the same Major Nikon Feb 2014 #170

which anyone would say about any event when no one saw. still concerned enough to protect seabeyond Feb 2014 #174

Which proves absolutely nothing other than an allegation was made Major Nikon Feb 2014 #191

NO custody. NO visitation. NO supervised visitation. i get some need a video of the rape or be seabeyond Feb 2014 #193

'Smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan' Z_I_Peevey Feb 2014 #27

He makes me want to ann--- Feb 2014 #31

pervert, yes. likes to "joke" at womens rapes and molestation, and the boys giggle. xwife raped seabeyond Feb 2014 #32

Well, you better get clucking about an awful lot of comedians then. KittyWampus Feb 2014 #77

"Clucking?" Really? Expressing disgust for a joke he made about the sexual assault of his Squinch Feb 2014 #89

clucking? as in a hen? seabeyond Feb 2014 #119

Based on your argument no one should ever believe an accused person is innocent of rape. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #39

hyperbole. the logical would at least take into consideration the fact that pedophiles will always seabeyond Feb 2014 #67

No that would be statistics not logic, and statistics are trumped by the truth in a specific case. PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #76

Nononono. If the witch drowns, THAT is how she proves her innocence, because a witch floats. nt tblue37 Feb 2014 #242

Throw her in the water! WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #269

My creep-o-meter says, "CREEP." DamnYankeeInHouston Feb 2014 #14

And Mia registers 100 on my "Fatal Attraction" psycho woman meter. Bonobo Feb 2014 #22

Yes, I would leave my pet rabbit with Mia. No, I would not leave any of my children with Woody. ymmv Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #41

+1. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #68

as a sexual abuse survivor Voice for Peace Feb 2014 #54

the judge found that she was a loving and caring mother treestar Feb 2014 #95

As a stepfather... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #141

I wouldn't want either Woody or Mia to be within a mile of *me* for that matter. tblue37 Feb 2014 #250

Dylan Farrow's response to Allen's NY Times op-ed... PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #15

Thanks Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #220

"self-absorbed, untrustworthy and insensitive", "his behavior grossly inappropriate with dylan" seabeyond Feb 2014 #16

He is a ann--- Feb 2014 #29

Of course you don't. Good thing Soon-yi wasn't Allen's adopted teenage daughter. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2014 #53

She was the adopted ann--- Feb 2014 #307

Mia and Woody never lived together. He never even spent the night at Mia's. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2014 #308

Woah woah, wait. He took a lie detector and she refused? LittleBlue Feb 2014 #34

Not quite: Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #62

According to Dylan, this is misleading. Allen refused to take a state-administered lie detector Tanuki Feb 2014 #63

Interesting. The truth about who was reluctant to take the lie detector LittleBlue Feb 2014 #82

It seems like someone took one.... And someone didn't. Agschmid Feb 2014 #161

There's a reason that courts don't accept 'lie detector' results as evidence. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #86

No, it's a sign that you know they are inaccurate treestar Feb 2014 #88

He refused to take the POLICE lie detector test LiberalEsto Feb 2014 #142

Neither would be Major Nikon Feb 2014 #277

Did it ever occur ann--- Feb 2014 #45

What sick & hideous movies did he produce? Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2014 #56

All of them ann--- Feb 2014 #295

court says he purposely worked toward causing animosity between siblings, adopted/biological, seabeyond Feb 2014 #73

But that was in reference to his behavior in this case and in the Soon Yi affair, because he was tblue37 Feb 2014 #254

He's been married to her for sixteen years Nevernose Feb 2014 #177

Here's The 1993 Woody Allen Custody Ruling In Its Damning, Detailed Entirety Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #46

Here's the exoneration from the 7 month investigation by the team the prosecution selected Major Nikon Feb 2014 #221

The judge read it, remember? Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #227

I'm still waiting for you to prove he said it wasn't credible Major Nikon Feb 2014 #233

Done many posts ago.,,but you knew that already. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #237

I have little doubt it's a game you play often Major Nikon Feb 2014 #283

Yep, I think you corner yourself and rely on semantics to assist your silly arguments. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #285

I do rely on the dictionary from time to time as do most fully literate people Major Nikon Feb 2014 #286

Which is useless for you, as evidenced in how the judge ruled in the end. What does sanitized mean? Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #288

I guess you didn't read what the appellate court wrote about the subject Major Nikon Feb 2014 #289

Don't pull that..I read the entire piece..you had a conversation with another Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #290

I'm just wondering why you're taking this so personally Major Nikon Feb 2014 #291

lol Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #292

compelling? I'd call it superficial, self serving and deceptive at best Ohio Joe Feb 2014 #50

the thread of the acutal court documents, nothing. the thread the accused molestor proclaims seabeyond Feb 2014 #64

Speaks ABSOLUTE FUCKING VOLUMES, doesn't it? redqueen Feb 2014 #194

pretty sure woody allen has a penis d_b Feb 2014 #69

Fact: Woody Allen is a male. RC Feb 2014 #144

DYLAN.... accused woody of molestation, just to be accurate. i know how important that is to you seabeyond Feb 2014 #147

After Mia took her out for some Ice cream. RC Feb 2014 #148

wrong. mia got off the phone when told woody allen had his head on her lap, kneeling in front of seabeyond Feb 2014 #150

What is my history of posts? RC Feb 2014 #151

The nanny that gave that account told one of the other nannies she regretted it Major Nikon Feb 2014 #205

nothing in the court documents. no links. seabeyond Feb 2014 #208

Link Major Nikon Feb 2014 #211

why did mia buy the icecream? seabeyond Feb 2014 #152

That would seem to be self evident. RC Feb 2014 #153

it isnt. what was the purpose? what was her reasoning. what are you arguing making this seabeyond Feb 2014 #154

Because before Mia took Dylan out for ice cream, she denied the molestation. RC Feb 2014 #156

she had already stated the molestation. she did not want to talk about it at the doctors. seabeyond Feb 2014 #157

i really am waiting for a reason that mia would brainwash her child to accuse a supposed innocent seabeyond Feb 2014 #165

Because Mia was mad at Woody and wanted to put him a bad light. RC Feb 2014 #196

all while she was "mad" at him she allowed visits with the children understanding the need seabeyond Feb 2014 #203

Bahahahahahaha... RC Feb 2014 #207

it is in the court documents. provide your, please seabeyond Feb 2014 #209

i have to leave for about ten minutes. i will check when i get back, why this matters. seabeyond Feb 2014 #155

no one knows wtf happened d_b Feb 2014 #158

ya... the rich famous privilege is being picked on cause he is male. ;) seabeyond Feb 2014 #159

I know ;) d_b Feb 2014 #160

Oh yes. We who bear the heavy baggage of a scrotum are so oppressed by the DU gynocratic tyrants! Scootaloo Feb 2014 #199

You don't recognize sarcasm? RC Feb 2014 #200

When you say it like that, Squinch Feb 2014 #284

From a comment on the New York Times article Beringia Feb 2014 #70

yep--that makes a lot of sense; I can conclude he's a narcissistic boundary violator if nothing else zazen Feb 2014 #129

I don't think Dylan's claim can fall under the 'ambiguity' defense, read what Dylan wrote: PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #189

While Beringia Feb 2014 #201

you may not know what either are capable of, but declared dylan lied and woody wouldnt do it. seabeyond Feb 2014 #204

it is an opinion Beringia Feb 2014 #210

So Allen took a lie detector test and passed it. And a team investigated for 7 months the accusation quinnox Feb 2014 #71

Your information is flawed: Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #80

If true, why was Mia Farrow never asked to take a lie detector test? Democat Feb 2014 #93

If ? It indicates they did not find cause to ask her and as you can see, the judge did Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #100

That's not what the judge said Major Nikon Feb 2014 #206

I read what he said, tell me where I am incorrect. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #214

"the judge did not find the Yale team credible." Major Nikon Feb 2014 #215

You have a lack of comprehension, that's your problem, not mine. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #216

Pot/Kettle Major Nikon Feb 2014 #217

Like I said, you do not comprehend, no nuance...he names Levanthal who was Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #225

So why can't you quote anything that proves your assertion? Major Nikon Feb 2014 #231

You have that backwards, but that appears to be a problem for you, overall, when Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #235

So as evidence of you not using the fully literate meaning of the word "less" you give an example Major Nikon Feb 2014 #240

You like getting the last word in that much, eh? Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #243

His whole life and career points to perverted behaviour. efhmc Feb 2014 #91

By career you must mean movie making DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #132

Notice how... Blue_Adept Feb 2014 #180

They might be referring to the movies cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #188

Excellently documented. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #228

Perhaps the poster refers to this... PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #224

Notice how... Squinch Feb 2014 #282

WHat I have to say Will piss all of you off! imthevicar Feb 2014 #107

Um... Agschmid Feb 2014 #163

I'll never believe a word that piece of garbage says. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #175

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #178

This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Feb 2014 #181

Legal Finding of Fact from the case BainsBane Feb 2014 #179

Except his argument doesn't match court records. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #187

From the court records... Major Nikon Feb 2014 #223

I'm talking about the actual court decision in Allen v. Farrow. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #248

that's what you should have said Major Nikon Feb 2014 #253

If Woody Allen wants to claim that Mia manipulated Dylan over some ice cream... Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #259

The court was concerned with custody Major Nikon Feb 2014 #261

No, the custody appeal definitely mentions the abuse allegations on the first page. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #266

Actually there were two appeals Major Nikon Feb 2014 #271

The first makes mention of it? It's a central point in the decision. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #276

I don't see how it could be a central point Major Nikon Feb 2014 #279

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #226

Did so. HERVEPA Feb 2014 #263

Did not HERVEPA Feb 2014 #264

Did so HERVEPA Feb 2014 #267

Did not HERVEPA Feb 2014 #268

Until a corroborating victim comes forward, its made up. reddread Feb 2014 #296

The one he married has maintained silence Generic Other Feb 2014 #314

If money protects him, why didnt he pay off Mia when Dershowitz made the offer? reddread Feb 2014 #315

Why Soon-Yi stays with Woody? Generic Other Feb 2014 #316

you must know her pretty well reddread Feb 2014 #318

I don't know her at all Generic Other Feb 2014 #321

I think the bottom line is they tried to secure a payoff and he refused. speaks volumes. reddread Feb 2014 #323

I don't believe in witch hunts for good causes. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2014 #297

The fact that Allen does not bring a lawsuit tells me a great deal Gothmog Feb 2014 #325

It only shows he's not an idiot, and has halfway decent lawyers Distant Quasar Feb 2014 #329