Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "On the fourth day, I’d be assassinated." [View all]You think the US is the only thing keeping China and Russia from going after each other?
Not the only thing, but major component. If anything the US at least causes any country to think twice about disturbing the status quo.
If they went after each other today, who do you think the US would side with?
Most likely China due to our mutually beneficial trade relationship.
Do you think the US has the ability to resist SA and Iran right now? Afghanistan is giving us some troubles and consuming a lot of resources.
Absolutely. Afghanistan's location between Iran and Pakistan requires the US to be
much more sensitive in the application of our military might for fear of starting total war.
But if it came down to it, we'd be in Tehran in under six months.
Who do you think would colonize African countries?
China and Russia are currently heavily investing in snapping up African natural resources. The lack of a US presence would put that into overdrive.
Europe would be left to fend for itself against whom?
Both Russia to the east and against themselves. Russian influence is already causing havoc in the Ukraine and lack of US defenses would only embolden Russia even more to put its former states under its wing again.
The lack of US defenses would also mean that Europe would have to cut into popular social programs in order to fund actual militaries now that the US wouldn't be doing the heavy lifting for them.
This would cause social unrest as we saw with the austerity protests and destabilize the region in general.
While these are what I feel to be the most likely scenarios, in general the US withdrawing from the world would leave a huge power vacuum that wouldn't be filled by people singing kumbaya under a rainbow.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agreed. Especially with the world so connected now, isolationism would only make it worse.
7962
Feb 2014
#63
And yet, history shows that other Empires who were 'keeping all those other places
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#24
The US was the first to respond to the Tsunami of 2004. Not to mention countless others.
7962
Feb 2014
#65
Seriously? You can check it out. One organization is Direct Relief International...
Hekate
Feb 2014
#72
The would still require a compliant Congress. The President can't do it. 2014 is important.
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2014
#73
Without forward deployment hiding at home behind our nuclear weapons won't work
proudretiredvet
Feb 2014
#35
Well, we'll certainly have to disagree about the US being the world's policemen.
maddiemom
Feb 2014
#38
Many thanks for taking the time to reply and being obviously thoughtful in doing so.
maddiemom
Feb 2014
#62