General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen: 'Distortions and Outright Lies' [View all]BainsBane
(57,339 posts)You are repeating what Woody Allen said.
Yes, he was not convicted of abuse. True. He is legally innocent. That does not mean he didn't assault Dylan. Very few child molesters are ever prosecuted.
There is no evidence of coaching. None. the court made that clear. You are not repeating facts. You are repeating the product of Woody Allen's publicity machine. You claimed the court record wasn't a primary source. That is complete crap.
I don't even know what you mean by "support an admitted child rapist" or the lifetime achievement award, but it is aside from the point. Mia is not the issue. The court was clear that there was ZERO evidence of coaching. None. She told multiple people from the start, including a therapist on Woody's payroll, and Mia was not present.
You are repeating a lot of nonsense and absolutely no fact.
So if you're going to claim Woody did not abuse Dylan, have the decency to stay on topic and call her the liar rather than trying to deflect onto Mia. That claim by Allen has been proved false.
Did you even read the Family Court ruling? Do you even care?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/205403621/Allen-v-Farrow-Custody-Ruling-June-7-1993?secret_password=2jgnvvvj4srefyj6ah9k