General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen: 'Distortions and Outright Lies' [View all]BainsBane
(57,339 posts)In fact, the judge said her primary fault was continuing a relationship with Allen and letting him near her kids. She made excuses for him for far too long. He was not allowed to be alone with the kids, according to the custody arrangement, even before the assault. He sued Mia for custody, yet not a one of his own character witnesses would say he was a good father. Not one. Not one recommended his suit be granted.
The judge spoke about how unusual it was to keep a father from visitation with a child. That the father is presumed to have that right, but that for Dylan's safety, he was prohibited from even supervised visitation. That is how damaging of a father the Judge believed him to be. His assessment of Mia was entirely different, which you would know if you had bothered to read the legal finding and custody ruling.
Family court ruling: http://www.scribd.com/doc/205403621/Allen-v-Farrow-Custody-Ruling-June-7-1993?secret_password=2jgnvvvj4srefyj6ah9k