Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This Little Nugget From Edward Snowden This Week... [View all]Response to pnwmom (Reply #21)
closeupready This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Case You Missed This Little Nugget From Edward Snowden This Week... [View all]
WillyT
Feb 2014
OP
I may be wrong but back then I can't remember anyone on DU defending the practice. n/t
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#10
Depends completely on your definition of "wrong." I don't think it was "wrong" that
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#21
I am going to cautiously say that I think I agree with you. But let's keep it between us. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#24
Wrong is the massive spying on the American people. It was when Bush did it, it was
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#34
Read my post again. I agreed with you that US internal surveillance is wrong. But I don't think
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#39
You don't think Russia and China would listen in on the President's cell if they could? Get real. n/
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#44
Of course they do and of course he knows it, just as they know America listens in on them.
merrily
Feb 2014
#51
Who are you trying to kid, pretending that leaking information about international spying,
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#65
It doesn't matter what I think, the fact that the technology is available to so is the problem, not
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#79
I doubt Angela was surprised. Germans were in an uproar; and she wanted to show
merrily
Feb 2014
#50
There's a vast difference between knowing it in theory, and knowing it in its DETAILS.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#46
And I am glad that spying helped reduce casualties by informing Pearl Harbor
MyNameGoesHere
Feb 2014
#78
Then you must be as shocked as I was to see Obama say he would reduce foreign spying!!!!
grahamhgreen
Feb 2014
#86
I can't believe this narcissist continues to point out how the emperor is wearing no clothes
riderinthestorm
Feb 2014
#7
Figured you'd know exactly what I meant. Your previous exchange @ that was epic nt
riderinthestorm
Feb 2014
#73
Paranoid hallucinations are a poor substitute for fact-based analysis
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#58
Unless you read a lot of news accounts, pick out the statements closest to verifiable facts,
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#64
Here's an exercise for you: who was most concerned that Snowden not get out of the reach of the US?
merrily
Feb 2014
#66
I suggested to you a way of reading the news, that has become more easily available
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#68
You don't mind if I stop replying to posts that are nothing but condescension, do you?
merrily
Feb 2014
#69
Well, then, let us by all means test your version of events against the facts. The way to start
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#71
I am quite aware that you did not invent the story but merely repeated it from other sources
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#70
The US Government made it impossible for Snowden to continue his journey and forced him to remain
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#83
The US Government is responsible for stopping him from leaving Russia, a stopover airport on his way
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#84
Can Eddie point out any officials who traveled to a foreign country, (say) China, and provided
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#61