General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen: 'Distortions and Outright Lies' [View all]BellaKos
(318 posts)Well, for one thing, the poster you referenced did not say that Dylan didn't have the right to have a voice. I don't know that anyone here has asserted that. My interpretation of what he said was that the accusation of being a pedophile was just as egregious as being molested. I disagree that it's just *as* bad, but I agree with him in that being falsely accused of something so vile is a damn bad thing to happen to a person -- especially if he's innocent.
Anyway ... I don't know if there are women here who are emotionally damaged. How on earth can I know that? But I will say that women here have described their own experiences with molestation among other similar traumas -- which would lead me to suspect that they are damaged. How could they not be wounded? The process of healing from such events takes a very, very long time.
But ... I can assess strictly from the language used in the course of the disputes here when a writer is coming from a perspective that is influenced by past experiences and emotions. Yes, call people out, but even then, I bristle when I see someone misunderstood and then attacked and insulted. And if one is presenting an outline of the facts for discussion, then rational argument is muddied when emotional language is used. The case, then, cannot meet the standard of "rational thought" if it is apparent that the writer is coming from an emotional perspective.
Excuse me. I just have Mr. Spock sitting in my head. Cain't hep it.