General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen: 'Distortions and Outright Lies' [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)First of all, Dershowitz is a shitbag lawyer that represents shitbags, so if you put a lot of stock in what he swears to under oath I'd say you're a bolder investor than I am. Note how Derschowitz claims he "isn't that type of lawyer" as if anyone is really going to believe that.
Next, Dershowitz does not deny an offer was made. In fact he specifically admits there was. His claim was there was no onus between the offer and Farrow dropping the matter with the police, as if Allen was supposed to pay her $8 million just for shits and giggles. If you believe that, I have a bridge for sale.
Finally, two other lawyers testified under oath that Derschowitz did offer that deal. So the evidence actually is there. You just selectively decided to believe Derschowitz who is far less believeable seeing as how his testimony and alternate explanation reeks of the bullshit. Had Derschowitz admitted to what is plainly obvious he would have been disbarred and possibly even prosecuted for extortion or conspiracy to extortion. Derschowitz might be a crooked shitbag lawyer, but he isn't a monumentally stupid crooked shitbag lawyer.