Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
6. Raising the minimum wage makes sense.
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 11:12 AM
Feb 2014

We have privatized so much government work. Why not privatize the cost or at least part of the cost of food stamps, for example, or Medicaid (what is left of it), etc.?

If privatization is good for the post office, it should be good for other aspects of our economy. If Republicans are really serious about downsizing the food stamp program and Medicaid, etc., they should eagerly support a higher minimum wage.

Hey! While we are at it, if Republicans are serious about paying off our national debt, they should support raising the minimum wage. Raising the minimum wage would, as wages overall rose, possibly increase tax revenue without changing the tax code all that much. If Republicans fight raising the minimum wage, it will be because they enjoy Schadenfreude -- pleasure at the misery or loss of others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Check out ProSense Feb 2014 #1
Great interactive graphic. JaneyVee Feb 2014 #10
k&r... spanone Feb 2014 #2
Great editorial. Thanks for posting it, ProSense. pampango Feb 2014 #3
Yes it is, and you're welcome. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #7
K&R. Thanks for posting this ProSense. Coyotl Feb 2014 #4
One of the signs ProSense Feb 2014 #8
Kick! Cha Feb 2014 #5
Raising the minimum wage makes sense. JDPriestly Feb 2014 #6
Higher minimum wage = best economic stimulus, more tax revenue, lower social service costs, and Coyotl Feb 2014 #9
Exactly. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT editorial: The Case f...»Reply #6