Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

greatlaurel

(2,020 posts)
20. You are onto something here.
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 06:03 PM
Feb 2014

The whole thing about Petraeus and his showing up at a bunch of right wing meetings that summer and the clear screw up of the CIA in the Benghazi mess smells a lot. 3 CIA guys got killed there, too. A lot of people at the CIA have not forgotten that, either. Petraeus got to retire with a little egg on his face over the affair, and he went real quiet, so he knows that something much more serious could have come out of it for him.

Petraeus needs to butter up HRC any way he can, because she was clearly infuriated that her friend was killed. He is probably shaking in his boots about HRC as president, she will not forget what happened to her friend.

People saying he wants the VP spot is a laugh. He just hopes to keep his pension after 2016. It will not be forgotten how she had to keep quiet about what happened. Is there a statute of limitations for treason?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He hates republicans? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #1
Yes that seems like two bowls of popcorn - one for Clinton and one for Petraeus. nt el_bryanto Feb 2014 #2
TPTB have spoken. nt tridim Feb 2014 #3
“In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and riversedge Feb 2014 #4
Hawks of a feather..... Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #5
...create mayhem together! polichick Feb 2014 #12
And, wave flags together. Lotsa flags. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #14
Since Benghazi was CIA-related, I suspect we don't know the full story TwilightGardener Feb 2014 #6
yep. When a rw bush loving war thumping repugnicant endorses Whisp Feb 2014 #7
or maybe she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled OKNancy Feb 2014 #8
Maybe he wants to be in her cabinet. RC Feb 2014 #11
lol n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #9
I think the entire operation in Libya was a Patreus run operation. She fell on her sword and gave okaawhatever Feb 2014 #10
Actually, Susan Rice was the public face of Benghazi blame. TwilightGardener Feb 2014 #18
HUH?????? Clinton wasn't harmed by her association with the events in Libya? AYFKM? Yes, Susan Rice okaawhatever Feb 2014 #19
I believe Petraeus did appear at some point before Congress, if memory TwilightGardener Feb 2014 #21
Patreus testified behind closed doors for both the House and Senate Intelligence Committee. It okaawhatever Feb 2014 #24
You are onto something here. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #20
I have seen it written somewhere that Patreus was asked to be the candidate for President by the okaawhatever Feb 2014 #25
he said the same… stillcool Feb 2014 #13
I have said before that I won't caucus for her and Skidmore Feb 2014 #15
I think she is qualified to be president. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #16
he'll turn if she's the nominee independentpiney Feb 2014 #17
What is her position on Afghanistan? solarhydrocan Feb 2014 #22
For Honduras? Not so much. Octafish Feb 2014 #23
So did Alice Walton Warpy Feb 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ex.Gen.Petraeus Endorses ...»Reply #20