Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yay, ObamaRomneyCare! 23% rate increase! [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)85. Why is Obama being
biased toward small businesses and exempting them?
Obama Administration Delays Key Obamacare Provision For Employers
By Sy Mukherjee
On Monday, the Obama administration once again eased rules requiring large employers to provide their workers basic health benefits under the Affordable Care Act. Last summer, the White House delayed the enforcement of this provision for one year, after some firms said they wouldnt be ready to expand coverage in 2014. Now, the administration is further delaying the mandate for medium-sized firms and easing requirements for larger ones...companies that have between 50 and 99 employees will have until 2016 to extend insurance to their employees if they dont already do so. Larger companies with 100 or more workers can avoid paying a fine if they offer health care to at least 70 percent of their workers next year, and cover 95 percent of their workers in 2016.
<...>
Obamacare requires companies with 50 or more workers to provide a basic level of health benefits that cover, on average, at least 60 percent of an employees medical costs. Premiums for these plans cannot exceed 9.5 percent of a workers annual salary and the coverage must offer a multitude of benefits, such as prescription drugs. Companies that dont comply with the requirements risk paying a $2,000 per employee fine for every worker after the first 30 workers who isnt offered a policy.
Advocacy groups noted that the delay would have minimal effect on American firms and the health laws broader objectives. The news today that employers with 51-100 employees will not be required to provide insurance to their workers under the new healthcare law until 2016 does not impact the vast majority of small business owners, said Small Business Majority CEO John Arensmeyer in a statement.
Ninety-six percent of businesses in this country have fewer than 50 employees. For these employers nothing changes because they were already exempt from the employer responsibility requirements. For businesses with more than 50 employees, 96 percent already offer insurance and we believe will continue to for business reasons. Only the 4 percent of larger employers that do not offer health insurance will be impacted by the delay in the penalty.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/02/11/3275691/obama-administration-eases-employer-mandate/
By Sy Mukherjee
On Monday, the Obama administration once again eased rules requiring large employers to provide their workers basic health benefits under the Affordable Care Act. Last summer, the White House delayed the enforcement of this provision for one year, after some firms said they wouldnt be ready to expand coverage in 2014. Now, the administration is further delaying the mandate for medium-sized firms and easing requirements for larger ones...companies that have between 50 and 99 employees will have until 2016 to extend insurance to their employees if they dont already do so. Larger companies with 100 or more workers can avoid paying a fine if they offer health care to at least 70 percent of their workers next year, and cover 95 percent of their workers in 2016.
<...>
Obamacare requires companies with 50 or more workers to provide a basic level of health benefits that cover, on average, at least 60 percent of an employees medical costs. Premiums for these plans cannot exceed 9.5 percent of a workers annual salary and the coverage must offer a multitude of benefits, such as prescription drugs. Companies that dont comply with the requirements risk paying a $2,000 per employee fine for every worker after the first 30 workers who isnt offered a policy.
Advocacy groups noted that the delay would have minimal effect on American firms and the health laws broader objectives. The news today that employers with 51-100 employees will not be required to provide insurance to their workers under the new healthcare law until 2016 does not impact the vast majority of small business owners, said Small Business Majority CEO John Arensmeyer in a statement.
Ninety-six percent of businesses in this country have fewer than 50 employees. For these employers nothing changes because they were already exempt from the employer responsibility requirements. For businesses with more than 50 employees, 96 percent already offer insurance and we believe will continue to for business reasons. Only the 4 percent of larger employers that do not offer health insurance will be impacted by the delay in the penalty.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/02/11/3275691/obama-administration-eases-employer-mandate/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did you think that once this Health Insurance Bill went into effect people would forget their
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#78
I will never forget it. The excuse fall apart when not one Republican voted for the bill. All I
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#205
The people you cited don't need subsidies, you said so yourself. But those who do? Who is paying
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#119
I jumped in for the same reason you jump in. It is a discussion board. And yes, that is what
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#152
So? I am glad to pay a little more to make sure EVERYONE has Health Insurance...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#151
It allows states to restrict rate increases. Your friend should complain to Massachusetts,
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#106
Yes it does. They can reject increases above 10% that they decide are unjustified. 23% is above 10%.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#130
You obviously have never read CMS's comments accepting or rejecting, the opinion of the RUC.
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#231
So do I. In fact, I was one of the first to read Chao's Harvard study that led to RBRVS.
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#233
Catch the exchange downnthread between me and a poster who doesn't bother to read threads...only OPs
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#196
Recced. 100% single payer fan here. Fuck for-profit. AND EVERYONE WHO FOISTS IT. nt
livingwagenow
Feb 2014
#24
ACA represents progress, imperfect as it is. But I'll continue to advocate for Medicare for All ...
Scuba
Feb 2014
#32
The REAL point is the Healthcare System has a Fatal Pre-Existing Condition which ACA made worse
Armstead
Feb 2014
#44
Don't forget the backdrop of Obamacare's rollout. There may be manipulation of healthcare
Romulox
Feb 2014
#74
But Health Insurers are *OUR* heartless corporate money siphons. They are the *good* corporations,
Romulox
Feb 2014
#64
"We the People" can not afford Wallstreet Healthcare masquerading as the ACA.
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#79
If the data in the OP were correct, then it really would be "Bullshit"
scheming daemons
Feb 2014
#84
Maybe the mandate's postponed because... they're seeing shocking premium increases? nt
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2014
#90
Isn't Massachusetts and Connecticut home to these profitable Insurance companies?
adirondacker
Feb 2014
#99
They're LIARS. Obamacare set up exchanges for individuals and small businesses WITHOUT insurance.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#105
If you and another DUer (who shall remain unnamed) were to conceive a child ...
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
#116
What do you expect when single-payer advocates were escorted out of the proceedings?
Fantastic Anarchist
Feb 2014
#117
Can we see your data? Also, are you saying there were never 23% increases prior to Obamacare?
CreekDog
Feb 2014
#134
We are not stupid. We are fighting this tooth and nail. Next stop: Vermont Single Payer.
grahamhgreen
Feb 2014
#142
Sanders along with Democrats from a few key States fought hard to built that provision
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2014
#161
Look...I can't be responsible if you refuse to read threads, and get confused
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#195
Your teachers never taught you to hold your questions to the end? One of the more tiresome
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#216
Basic costs of Massachusetts health plans show small increases as Obamacare goes into effect
ProSense
Feb 2014
#179