Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeJoe

(1,039 posts)
12. There are two different inequality issues...
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:33 PM
Feb 2014

...but most people seem to blend them into one.

The first issue is that the superrich are quickly getting super richer. I believe that this is because they have rigged the game to increase the returns to those in control of the financial sector. This is increasingly leading to our being led by a plutocracy. This problem can be addressed politically.

The second issue is that there is a growing gap (gulf) between low earners and high earners. Middle income jobs are disappearing while low and high income jobs are growing. This problem is much harder to address. It isn't because of a policy. It is because technology is making some workers much more valuable and other workers much less valuable. The net result is that society is being split between people that can't ever hope to make $40,000/year and people starting their careers well above that.

I see examples of the latter in my personal life. My sister's three kids are in their early to mid-20s. The oldest has been in and out of college with no direction and no major. He's worked a series of retail and fast food jobs and has no prospects to earn a middle class income. Her second child finished college with a literature degree. She's working as an admin assistant and, barring marrying well, will also struggle to be in the middle class. The third child graduated with an engineering degree and started his career making in the low six figures. They will all live significantly different lives economically from how they were raised.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oxfam report said that 85 people have a collective wealth greater than half the worlds population MMcGuire Feb 2014 #1
That really settles the argument completely, doesn't it! Coyotl Feb 2014 #2
In terms of agenda MMcGuire Feb 2014 #3
It is on par with destruction TBF Feb 2014 #4
I would say "regulating" instead. Coyotl Feb 2014 #7
I'm a bit further left - TBF Feb 2014 #10
Regulation and enforcement of the regulation. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #17
It ranks below girafficide. FarCenter Feb 2014 #5
Hmmm oldandhappy Feb 2014 #6
It can/should be the main issue, but it is poorly framed Tom Rinaldo Feb 2014 #8
Great point and i agree. Also, economic justice encompassed a system that provides employment, Coyotl Feb 2014 #9
True. Economic justice is a more encompassing issue. n/t Tom Rinaldo Feb 2014 #16
framing inequality davidcay Feb 2014 #21
All three are fine pieces David. bluesbassman Feb 2014 #22
My guess is that it is a world issue and no one knows what to do about it and those that do can't. jwirr Feb 2014 #11
There are two different inequality issues... FreeJoe Feb 2014 #12
Without economic democracy, there is only "managed" democracy. bemildred Feb 2014 #13
Well said, bemildred! Enthusiast Feb 2014 #18
Yes. THIS!^^^^^^^^^^^ socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #19
"Let them eat cake" depends upon how many pots have chickens! One_Life_To_Give Feb 2014 #14
Without the Food Stamps program, that is exactly where we would be, Coyotl Feb 2014 #15
I would venture to say you could find 315 people on DU..... socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #20
The big issue of our times is NOT income inequality. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2014 #23
If they're a CNBC favorite, chances are they're going to suck. HughBeaumont Feb 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Income inequality. Is it...»Reply #12