Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Extreme Left! [View all]stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)15. You clearly are NOT to be taken seriously...
And, Neither am I!
At least that's what some very wealthy and powerful people want the masses to believe!
It seems the masses wake up a little bit more each year though...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Me too. And no more FAKE ATTACKS used to justify preemptive wars of choice!
Enthusiast
Feb 2014
#162
I should add lifting the cap on social security and implementing medicare for all or some
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#5
I know that, but the EPA of late has been a corporate rubber stamp, so don't assume I
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#8
Obama did mention recently that he was significantly to the right of Richard Milhous Nixon
Fumesucker
Feb 2014
#38
"Anarchist tendencies" being defined as opposing the military industrial complex.
JoeyT
Feb 2014
#80
Corporate elite have collaborated worldwide and has decided they no what is best for the rest of us.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#112
Please give me a specific example of what you mean by "anarchist tendencies". /nt
Marr
Feb 2014
#236
There are a lot of things that happened that got Bush elected. Blaming the left is asinine.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#205
It's used in exactly the same way that "Liberal" was used by Republicans. [n/t]
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#54
Some democrats hated the word liberal too and used it as a bludgeoning tool in primaries.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#56
On DU I prefer to refer to the right-wing Democrats as liberal bashers, it's what they like to do.
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#68
First I would start out by insulting all the low information wishy washy voters.
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#232
Right wing Democrats offer no alternative to the Republicans they run against and then
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#242
Those deriding the "Extreme Left" on this forum don't even know what "Extreme Left" means.
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#118
the reference is considered a badge of honor for them. They call themselves "Blue Dogs".
2banon
Feb 2014
#234
I have no idea what you're talking about.. I think you should leave me out of this.
2banon
Feb 2014
#244
I do not mind working with others, I have a problem beginning negotiations from the center right and
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#11
I used to hold the position that compromise was necessary, but after 30 years of
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2014
#13
Then WHY is it that the people you are calling "Extreme Left" are ALWAYS the ones..
bvar22
Feb 2014
#25
Compromise means those of us on the left give while the other side concedes nothing.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#52
And when we're being pushed to "compromise" they tell us there aren't enough of us to matter
dflprincess
Feb 2014
#134
compromise to them is allowing republicans to spit in our faces and we graciously get to say thanks
frwrfpos
Feb 2014
#141
You must despise FDR, Eisesnhower, and Truman. Damn those socialists with their big
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#216
FDR imprisoned tens of thousands of americans, Truman dropped the bomb, EIsenhower was Republican
ConservativeDemocrat
Feb 2014
#235
Everyone I listed is owned by Wall St. And Obama has killed thousands with drone strikes and one
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#237
DESPERATELY needed dose of hard reality. Way too little of that around here. Thanks for that
Number23
Feb 2014
#217
Actually, when asked issue by issue they agree with me, but the word liberal has been demonized and
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#219
Whether that's true or not is irrelevant. The poster posted a clear link to an issue where
Number23
Feb 2014
#220
That is because of the talking heads, but once again time after time again, people agree with people
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#223
I have met a number of self proclaimed moderates who fit the definition of extremist you provide
Bjorn Against
Feb 2014
#34
Nice post, Jamaal. The "dislikes moderates" is pretty much the point blank definition of
Number23
Feb 2014
#115
No, its dislike of trojan horse democrats that push for a corporate conservative agenda
Armstead
Feb 2014
#147
It's not one's ideology that gets one labeled "Extreme Left" "Far Left" or "Purist"
BrotherIvan
Feb 2014
#14
They could afford it, but nobody important is going to suffer any consequences for using it,
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#28
This nation was conceived and founded by extremist, radical, terrorists, who committed treason,
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#23
In the end, it's the most important goal. True, literal equality is essential to success,
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#36
This is important, I understand that there will be people who will have more but
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#44
And that is simply not possible in an egalitarian environment. The idea of anyone having that much
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#55
Says you and nobody else. They were called all of those things and more, and had we lost,
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#129
When wanting to throw white collar criminals in prison is considered extreme something is wrong.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#29
I know, but if you were to ask Rahm Emmanuel you and I would be viewed as crazies.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#71
No! That is dangerous. That is just real left. Don't let anyone, even DUers change the spectrum.
cui bono
Feb 2014
#46
Yeah, they try to discredit us any way possible. But we can't give them an inch. n/t
cui bono
Feb 2014
#91
The Political Spectrum has moved so far to the Conservative Right in the last 30 years...
bvar22
Feb 2014
#48
What's always slayed me is that the use of that description identifies the user more accurately
stupidicus
Feb 2014
#66
I'm so goddam extreme I am against not having the backbone to resist taking food stamps
jtuck004
Feb 2014
#74
Regulations are always weakend over time. That's the problem you are talking about.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#101
Sorry, but it's not greedy people. At least not in the main. It's the system itself......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#133
Systemically encouraging, rewarding, and multiplying this is foolhardy at best.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#150
The so called extreme left is tired of being ran over by plutocrats and their executive,
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#96
I know what I'm not, part of the mindless cheerleading wing who look at politics
quinnox
Feb 2014
#99
I think you're only considered an extremist if you think policies will be changed for the better.
Jefferson23
Feb 2014
#100
+1000000 They are not "centrists. " The worst of them are corporate fascists.
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#125
Unfortunately people in both parties aren't finished destroying regular people.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#139
All of those positions pole centrist. The 'centrists' are actually to the right of Reagan, it's said
grahamhgreen
Feb 2014
#153
Indeed, it has. I fully support your OP. We could think about a Nihilist Democratic Party (p342-4)
ancianita
Feb 2014
#171
We need people in the streets and I mean millions upon millions, that will be the only way the media
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#173
Media blackouts are a thing now. So media will have to be dealt with creatively. Read this book.
ancianita
Feb 2014
#175
Hillary has the support of people like Jamie Dimon, because she isn't a threat to the status quo.
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#179
A lot of repukes believe that when they have a lot in common with the Nazi's like repeating the big
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#178
Corporatists laws are the reason why we are in another bubble at this very moment, I am expecting
JRLeft
Feb 2014
#185
There is harly a left at all anymore in this country, much less an extreme one.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Feb 2014
#202