Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Third Way's Jon Cowan. "The left's four fiscal fantasies" [View all]
Another View - Jon Cowan: The left's four fiscal fantasiesSneaking in more ways to cut safety nets. He just can't resist it.
Fantasy No. 1 is that taxing the rich solves our problems
Fantasy No. 2 is that "we can have it all" a bigger safety net and more investments that spur growth and opportunity. Events of the past 50 years say the opposite.
In the mid-1960s, the federal government spent $3 on public investments for every $1 on the major entitlement programs. By the early 1970s, the ratio was one to one. Last year, it flipped. The federal government spent $3 on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for every $1 on federal investments, according to our analysis of data from the Office of Management and Budget. By 2022, the ratio will be one to five. In other words, entitlement programs are drowning out public investments just as international competition and technology demand that we need these investments the most.
That is a 50-year trend, but what is most mind-boggling is that some on the left still cling to a belief bordering on faith that if a spending program is worthy, voters will support it without trade-offs
Fantasy No. 3 is that a delay on entitlement fixes is benign for the middle class. As evidence, some liberals point to this year's Medicare trustee report, in which the program's fiscal outlook mercifully improved. In truth, it improved from horrid to awful. We can't make even that boast about Social Security, where the outlook is plain wretched. Over the past 10 years, the Social Security insolvency date had leapt forward from 2042 to 2033. The hope was that an improving economy would push the date farther out. It did not, and every indicator of Social Security health worsened between the 2012 and 2013 trustee reports.
Fantasy No. 4 is that the politics to fix entitlements will get better. His meaning of the word "fix" means cut, I fear.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like a plan to me........this, IMO, is what Hillary and Obama are all about.
djean111
Feb 2014
#3
The fantasy is that "no one" is saying that any of these things solve anything.
Lint Head
Feb 2014
#4
Defense should be a big target. But, assuming his deficit numbers are anywhere close to
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#10
Tell that to SS beneficiaries when their benefits are automatically cut by one-third, or
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#16
I agree. But, I don't think the needed big tax increase solves the problem. Good start,
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#19
BS like this from the Turd Way really makes me support Parity Purity even more
wocaonimabi
Feb 2014
#25
The republicans fleeing the crazy party have to go somewhere. Well lookie here, they're trying to
myrna minx
Feb 2014
#48