Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How Obama Officials Cried ‘Terrorism’ to Cover Up a Paperwork Error [View all]struggle4progress
(126,199 posts)4. Placed on the no-fly list 2004, sued 2006, and this is Obama's fault?
... In early 2005, she was detained for two hours at San Francisco's airport because authorities believed she was on the no-fly list.
Eventually, she was allowed to travel to Malaysia. However, her U.S. visa was revoked under a legal provision relating to suspected terrorist activities, though she was not told the specific factual basis for that action. She has not been allowed to return to the United States.
Ibrahim petitioned U.S. authorities to clear her name, but instead received a letter that did not say whether she was still on the no-fly list. She filed a lawsuit, claiming that her inability to return to the United States damaged her professionally.
The U.S. government has since conceded that Ibrahim is not a national security threat ...
FBI's no-fly list mistake kicked off woman's odyssey, filing says
By Dan Levine
SAN FRANCISCO Fri Feb 7, 2014 3:57am IST
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What the case shows is: improper use of an FBI form in 2004; subsequent improper
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#9
Yes, we elected Dems to fix all of this shit. It looks like we were hopelessly naive. But not any
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#14
They weren't Obama officials in 2004. Unless they were in Chicago. Obama wasn't yet a Senator.
SleeplessinSoCal
Feb 2014
#15
this "author" wrote a story five days ago about the same court case but you wouldn't recognize it
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#53
It took some effort to find a version of the story headlining the President
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#21
As soon as you sign off on that NSA micro-nano-chip that will report on them,
truedelphi
Feb 2014
#56
3 Obama officials are quoted in the article, tryign to cover up the bungle
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2014
#36
It's impossible to know exactly what the statements are arguing without context
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#38
I wrote further down the thread about how this same "author" wrote a story 5 days ago in his
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#54
... Ms. Ibrahim’s case ... casts light on the role of private contractors in deciding
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#5
There seem to have been at least two efforts to correct a database under the prior administration,
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#17
But surely no mistakes will be made with all the information being amassed on the general population
Alkene
Feb 2014
#10
I won't go that far, but I shall continue to hold the feet of the apologists...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2014
#47
I'm sure you wish it were, but the story is far less sexy than you might like
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#18
but you can't ever question officials, and it's *not* authoritarian to say that
MisterP
Feb 2014
#33
No joke, a poll taken 6 months ago by PPP shows that more Republican in LA blame Obama than Bush for
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#52
This article is pure bullcrap. The same "author" wrote a story about this trial five days ago and
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#51
As far as I can tell from the court decision, she was removed from the no-fly list in 2005 but
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#55