What REALLY happened to the plane that didn't hit the Pentagon on 9/11

[AZCat]

233. I see you've only been a member of DU since 2007.

I find it interesting that you think there has been suppression of discussion of September 11th theories, because that isn't historically true. It might seem that there is little patience for crackpot theories on DU today, but that's because of the extensive, oft repeated discussions of pretty much every available September 11th theory that didn't blatantly violate DU's principles.

These arguments don't come off as raising questions when they're raised for the twentieth time by the same person(s), with little to no recognition of the opposing arguments made the last nineteen times these were raised - instead they look more like crackpot beliefs in outlandish theories. Unfortunately it appears that calling out such repetitious behavior makes one a troll, at least in the eyes of certain posters.

I'd rather we be able to move beyond the trash that has become the lifeblood of the September 11th conspiracy community, but there seems to be little anyone can do to stem the trickle of recycled crap from returning over and over again. Seriously - can't we all agree that ludicrous claims like those of the "no planers" deserve no attention whatsoever?