Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
51. This article is pure bullcrap. The same "author" wrote a story about this trial five days ago and
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 08:30 AM
Feb 2014

you wouldn't even think it was the same event. I don't know if he rewrote the story and added the lies and hyperbole for a direct paycheck, or to get added circulation by having a bunch of foreign papers pick up the "new, improved, anti-American, anti-Obama" story. It smacks of "sponsored content" where someone paid him to make this story a hit piece about Obama. it's a disgrace and "reporters" like him should not be granted the protection of freedom of the press if the content of his stories are for sale.

Old Headline:
FBI Checks Wrong Box, Places Student on No-Fly List

New Headline:
How Obama Officials Cried ‘Terrorism’ to Cover Up a Paperwork Error

Old Explanation:
In this version, she isn't wheelchair bound, she isn't a "scholar", he admits she was held for only two hours, but of course fails to mention she took the next flight (which was the next day). How can one be on a no-fly list for seven years if she flew the next day? He never tells the whole truth about the trip. She was returning to her home in Malaysia for two months, but had scheduled a stop over in Hawaii where she was presenting a paper on affordable housing. Oddly, her partner on the paper was a student at the military naval college. Why did he write that she was denied her pain medication until 2005?

"The government contested a former Stanford University student’s assertion that she was wrongly placed on a no-fly list for seven years in court despite knowing an FBI official put her on the list by mistake because he checked the “wrong boxes” on a form, a federal judge wrote today."

"The judge issued a brief ruling last month declaring that the Malaysian woman was a victim of a bureaucratic “mistake.” The judge’s full opinion was released today."

"Ibrahim’s saga began in December 2005 when she was a visiting doctoral student in architecture and design from Malaysia. On her way to Kona, Hawaii to present a paper on affordable housing, Ibrahim was told she was on a watch list, detained, handcuffed and questioned for two hours at San Francisco International Airport."

SNIP

"She sued and federal authorities fought her all the way."

New Explanation:

"After seven years of litigation, two trips to a federal appeals court and $3.8 million worth of lawyer time, the public has finally learned why a wheelchair-bound Stanford University scholar was cuffed, detained and denied a flight from San Francisco to Hawaii: FBI human error."

"What happened next was the real shame. Instead of admitting to the error, high-ranking President Barack Obama administration officials spent years covering it up. Attorney General Eric Holder, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and a litany of other government officials claimed repeatedly that disclosing the reason Ibrahim was detained, or even acknowledging that she’d been placed on a watch list, would cause serious damage to the U.S. national security. Again and again they asserted the so-called “state secrets privilege” to block the 48-year-old woman’s lawsuit, which sought only to clear her name."

SNIP

"Ibrahim was a Stanford University doctoral student in architecture and design from Malaysia and was headed to Hawaii to give a paper on affordable housing. Wheelchair-bound after just having a hysterectomy, she was handcuffed, detained for hours at San Francisco International Airport and denied her pain medication until paramedics arrived in 2005. She was eventually released and allowed to fly to her home country of Malaysia."
_______________

According to Stanford Magazine:

DURING THAT DECEMBER nine years ago, those who knew Ibrahim, then a doctoral student in civil engineering, had one chief concern: her health. She had undergone an emergency hysterectomy 10 weeks prior to the trip. And though she had passed the worst of her recovery she remained unable to stand for long or go without medication for pain in her back and abdomen

Things began to unravel as soon as Ibrahim reached the ticket counter, where she sought wheelchair assistance.

Instead of heeding Ibrahim's request for help, the ticket agent called police. Ibrahim's name had flashed up on the federal no-fly list, a consolidated database of thousands of known or suspected terrorists created in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

Without explanation, Ibrahim was put in the back of a squad car, taken to a police substation, searched beneath her hijab, the traditional Muslim dress, and refused her pain medications until paramedics arrived to validate that she was authorized to take them, according to Ibrahim's account.

After more than two hours, a Homeland Security agent arrived with release papers and told Ibrahim that her name had been removed from the no-fly list. The next day, after enhanced security searches, she flew to Hawaii, unaware that the time spent there would be her final days in America.

________________

It's disappointing that some people are more concerned with promoting their own agenda than they are at promoting the truth. I would think those on DU would like for the readers to understand the events leading up to a trial, and not pushing hyperbole and lies on fellow readers. Obama didn't claim terrorism to cover up the mistake. Most of the trial wasn't even about Ms. Ibrahim but about the legal precedent for the case, the no-fly list, and so on. There are many unanswered questions about this case and the no-fly list in general, but this article does nothing to answer any of those things. The author is a liar and is pushing an agenda. Fall for it if it makes you feel good, but if you're interested in the truth and all the facts this isn't the article for you.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2014/02/no-fly-list-bungle/

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2014/02/no-fly-coverup/?cid=co18444944



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More people that won't get fired that need to be. RC Feb 2014 #1
Betcha none of them lost an ounce of sleep over it. jsr Feb 2014 #2
James Clapper is an unrepentant piece of shit. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #3
Placed on the no-fly list 2004, sued 2006, and this is Obama's fault? struggle4progress Feb 2014 #4
It says Obama Officials. Which is true. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #6
What the case shows is: improper use of an FBI form in 2004; subsequent improper struggle4progress Feb 2014 #9
Thank you yet again. kristopher Feb 2014 #12
It'd be great if the Obama Administration had the resources... berni_mccoy Feb 2014 #27
Yes, we elected Dems to fix all of this shit. It looks like we were hopelessly naive. But not any sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #14
That means you never paid attention to the case before today, right? struggle4progress Feb 2014 #16
They weren't Obama officials in 2004. Unless they were in Chicago. Obama wasn't yet a Senator. SleeplessinSoCal Feb 2014 #15
this "author" wrote a story five days ago about the same court case but you wouldn't recognize it okaawhatever Feb 2014 #53
Yes, if the name "Obama" is anywhere near it(or even if it's not).. it's all Cha Feb 2014 #20
It took some effort to find a version of the story headlining the President struggle4progress Feb 2014 #21
Sure it is. Bush's entire Presidency is Obama's fault. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #29
while the first mistake happened under bush questionseverything Feb 2014 #34
Sssh! We have to truedelphi Feb 2014 #39
so sorry questionseverything Feb 2014 #40
As soon as you sign off on that NSA micro-nano-chip that will report on them, truedelphi Feb 2014 #56
3 Obama officials are quoted in the article, tryign to cover up the bungle muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #36
It's impossible to know exactly what the statements are arguing without context struggle4progress Feb 2014 #38
Applying "Rational Basis of Law" to any of these ornate trappings truedelphi Feb 2014 #41
I wrote further down the thread about how this same "author" wrote a story 5 days ago in his okaawhatever Feb 2014 #54
... Ms. Ibrahim’s case ... casts light on the role of private contractors in deciding struggle4progress Feb 2014 #5
People make mistakes. reusrename Feb 2014 #8
There seem to have been at least two efforts to correct a database under the prior administration, struggle4progress Feb 2014 #17
Your tax dollars at (ahem) work blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #7
But surely no mistakes will be made with all the information being amassed on the general population Alkene Feb 2014 #10
oh don't worry - the apologist brigade will be along villager Feb 2014 #13
It's necessary to destroy our freedoms in order to preserve them friendly_iconoclast Feb 2014 #43
Good lord -- have things fallen so far apart that we are in agreement!? villager Feb 2014 #44
In this case, at least, they have and we do... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2014 #45
Well, good. Keep your damn guns locked up.... villager Feb 2014 #46
I won't go that far, but I shall continue to hold the feet of the apologists... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2014 #47
Well, we agree on the pairs of feet held to fire villager Feb 2014 #48
No need to lock up guns, I don't own any friendly_iconoclast Feb 2014 #49
Well, after years (I think it's years) of locking horns... villager Feb 2014 #50
Indictable? DeSwiss Feb 2014 #11
I'm sure you wish it were, but the story is far less sexy than you might like struggle4progress Feb 2014 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #19
thanks obama PowerToThePeople Feb 2014 #22
Whole buncha people need to be disciplined. bemildred Feb 2014 #23
Brings into question the validity of all of their secret "lists." Downwinder Feb 2014 #24
Clapper: weapons materials were "unquestionably" shipped out of Iraq to Syria jakeXT Feb 2014 #25
but you can't ever question officials, and it's *not* authoritarian to say that MisterP Feb 2014 #33
But Holder *did* get a huge raise for Jamie. MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #26
Hey! If you didn't do anything wrong you don't have to worry. rgbecker Feb 2014 #28
If it wasn't for Obama, Bush wouldn't have been elected. ProSense Feb 2014 #30
2004? gollygee Feb 2014 #31
why the fuck didn't Obama do anything about Katrina ? JI7 Feb 2014 #35
No joke, a poll taken 6 months ago by PPP shows that more Republican in LA blame Obama than Bush for okaawhatever Feb 2014 #52
K&R woo me with science Feb 2014 #32
Have I mentioned that this country is clear off the tracks? Enthusiast Feb 2014 #37
People must be sacrificed in the name of national security. L0oniX Feb 2014 #42
This article is pure bullcrap. The same "author" wrote a story about this trial five days ago and okaawhatever Feb 2014 #51
As far as I can tell from the court decision, she was removed from the no-fly list in 2005 but struggle4progress Feb 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Obama Officials Cried...»Reply #51