Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(15,383 posts)
28. Actually, it does. Married Pay, Married rations, and spousal benefits. Spouses get VA benefits.
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 04:33 PM
Feb 2014

Gen. Amos counts "couples" as married couples in this report, not as "relationships". It's very obvious when he discusses basket leave so that couples in states or areas without equal marriage rights can go to states to get married.

A dependent spouse (and any other dependents) costs almost as much as a military member for purposes of budget in the departments of Personnel, Medical, and Morale/Welfare (which includes Housing, Base Social Services, Educational Services, Exchange, and Commissary). When commanders plan manage their manning, they also have to take into account spouses and dependents. Spousal separation is a concern if you want to send someone off into combat, because of the dependency and relationship factor and how it affects both of them emotionally. If two people cared about each other enough to contemplate being life partners, that potential distraction must to be taken into account if there is going to be a danger of one of them not coming back. Yes, the military does plan and provide services for those situations, too. And those services have a price per member that needs to use them - they're a benefit, but they still need to be budgeted.

So, 144 more "dependents" - whether or not the dependent is also in the military - is significant to those commands where these new couples are located.

Haele

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Your thread title is misleading and unfairly defamatory to Amos. anasv Feb 2014 #1
humorless people Bucky Feb 2014 #3
um, the title/headline is more than a little misleading nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #2
ridiculous complaint Bucky Feb 2014 #4
i clicked on it thinking it was a story about homophobic comments nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #5
I think it was intended as a play on the number 144 (a gross) pinboy3niner Feb 2014 #6
Exactly my point. You immediately saw that he was reporting facts Bucky Feb 2014 #8
no, because i was thinking this doesn't seem like him. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #9
+1 n/t FreeState Feb 2014 #11
Considering there are 241031 marines.. Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #7
Where in the article did it mention that...... Historic NY Feb 2014 #13
What is speculation... Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #15
Big problem with your logic Bucky Feb 2014 #16
10% is generally accepted LGBT rate... Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #18
no, not really, it's like 3.8%, probably half that for the military snooper2 Feb 2014 #19
4 out of hundred...ya right Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #20
mkay..no need to argue about it..doesn't matter if .001% or 63.2% snooper2 Feb 2014 #21
You really think only 4 out of 100 americans are LGBT? Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #23
And 85% of the Marines are ages 26and younger. That age doesn't get married like they used to. haele Feb 2014 #24
Very interesting... Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #26
Why are they counting this? former9thward Feb 2014 #10
Pay and benifit purposes Revanchist Feb 2014 #12
Well if they have 144 couples that would have no impact whatsoever on the overall budget. former9thward Feb 2014 #14
But his point is that the Marines are institutionally cool with same sex couples. Bucky Feb 2014 #17
they count it for all couples. I was answering your question Revanchist Feb 2014 #22
Why separate it? former9thward Feb 2014 #25
Because somewhere along the line... DonViejo Feb 2014 #27
And he should say "I have no idea". former9thward Feb 2014 #29
Except the military keeps records about how many African Americans, Asians, DonViejo Feb 2014 #32
You don't think it's relevant to e.g. recruitment? Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2014 #35
Its not a significant number. former9thward Feb 2014 #36
Not yet, true. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2014 #37
I think the General was making a point. Revanchist Feb 2014 #33
Actually, it does. Married Pay, Married rations, and spousal benefits. Spouses get VA benefits. haele Feb 2014 #28
There are 241,000 Marines. former9thward Feb 2014 #30
Benefits and leave allocation... Lost_Count Feb 2014 #34
I was Army, not USMC, but as far as women in combat positions, Aristus Feb 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marine Commandant Amos: &...»Reply #28