Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
22. That is different than a hazmat team
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 06:26 PM
Feb 2014

And for the record, the FEDS have them, but the FEDS might be required to respond to FEDERAL facilities, and yes national parks and forests.

I am not saying diddling did not happen. Just pointing out that weak regulations tend to lead to these results, including the weak response. Those regulations also help to pay for the teams.

I will give you a stupid example. Miller's Yard went up in flames AGAIN. They are a wrecking operation on I-8 in Flinn Springs. Here in San Diego the state did not respond. And mind you they had crap that was going into the creek. Who responded were the County of San Diego HAZMAT Team, and just because they have signed every mutual aid agreement in the county (and was part of the feds requirement to fund the team in the first place as a part of a Federal Grant) the far more extensive mobile lab, called the San Diego Fire Department Hazmat team. Those guys go almost everywhere. There are times only the county responds, it's a matter of geography, and the SDFD team has a very pretty but very heavy truck. Some rural roads are too much for them.

A facility like Freedom Industries in California would have a perimeter wall, damn regulations I know, just for starters, and control entry points.

Of course the company has filed bankruptcy, and the tax payer is going to be left holding the bag. I am betting that not even this though will lead to ANY regulations. Coal is king, and any regulations would make them flee the state... never mimd the coal veins are there. As they say, all politics are local. Never mind the California regulations make sense, they will never pass in the modern day state of WV. I fear not even five Freedom Industry leaks will do it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Asshole Gov. wasted time and money while endangering lives. It's his duty to fund it now. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2014 #1
Huh? truedelphi Feb 2014 #3
West Virginia's DEP is owned by the coal companies and that's the real problem nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #20
Last time I looked, West Virginia is inside the USA. truedelphi Feb 2014 #37
And WV is responsible for those Bush-Cheney geek tragedy Feb 2014 #38
Wasted time and money? What do you mean? I haven't been paying a lot of attention. nt okaawhatever Feb 2014 #5
By not deploying HazMat Teams, allowing the spread, telling folks to decide the water safety, etc. TheBlackAdder Feb 2014 #9
Maybe it does not work this way there nadinbrzezinski Feb 2014 #13
So WV does not have an Dept. of Environmental Protection Response Team either? nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2014 #15
That is different than a hazmat team nadinbrzezinski Feb 2014 #22
Oh thanks for that. I wasn't aware of a delayed response. I knew that Freedom industries didn't okaawhatever Feb 2014 #29
Damn that George W Bush. truedelphi Feb 2014 #2
Hey, they wanted Obama's EPA to get out of WV. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #4
I guess I am not following your logic. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #6
Nonsense. FEMA has responded to plenty of manmade disasters. KamaAina Feb 2014 #26
From you link - DURHAM D Feb 2014 #28
Exactly, and FEMA is supposed to help when the disaster is greater than the state's capacity to okaawhatever Feb 2014 #33
A poisoned water supply isn't an emergency?? Brigid Feb 2014 #7
That is not the issue. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #8
And the company that produced and stored the coal waste water. no_hypocrisy Feb 2014 #10
Yes. They should be 100% responsible but DURHAM D Feb 2014 #11
According to wikipedia's FEMA entry, Brigid Feb 2014 #12
I don't. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #14
I think you would change your tune real quick . . . Brigid Feb 2014 #16
Why don't you hold the government of WV responsible? DURHAM D Feb 2014 #18
This has gone beyond what the third poorest state in the country can do. Brigid Feb 2014 #21
Oh please. WV gets more handouts from the federal government than 90% of other states geek tragedy Feb 2014 #23
That is an older chart you're showing. The last one I saw had all top ten "givers" as blue states okaawhatever Feb 2014 #34
Ah, you are correct. But, WV is definitely geek tragedy Feb 2014 #36
Sure, every state wants someone else to pay for their problems geek tragedy Feb 2014 #19
it's not a bailout fund, it's a response team. there are no longer evacuations etc geek tragedy Feb 2014 #17
Visit WV and you will see thousands and thousands of signs doc03 Feb 2014 #24
they voted for George W Bush and Dick Cheney over Al Gore and John Kerry geek tragedy Feb 2014 #25
I am not condemning the whole state, I was born there and my mother doc03 Feb 2014 #31
Gov. Tomblin on Energy and Oil KansDem Feb 2014 #27
Why isn't the company that caused the disaster responsible for the clean-up costs? justiceischeap Feb 2014 #30
The company filed bankruptcy. I think the question will be how much insurance they had in place. okaawhatever Feb 2014 #35
And the right thing is a REGULATION that requires that companies carry sufficient insurance to Squinch Feb 2014 #39
Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-party of crony capitalists), just contact your contributors: freshwest Feb 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»West Virginia wants more ...»Reply #22