Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bill Clinton and Republicans promised NAFTA would create jobs.. [View all]brentspeak
(18,290 posts)48. "high tariffs serve as a barrier to trade"
You mean the kind of high tariffs that your favorite repressive ultra low-wage nation China assesses against the US? Those kinds of tariffs?
As has been asked of you many times before: stop hiding behind an FDR avatar to push your US Chamber of Commerce talking points. FDR tolerated regulated free trade between the US and highly developed nations of comparable wage scales; he didn't want to ship American industries overseas to near-slave-labor nations such as China and Mexico and then have those products shipped back to the US for sale on American store shelves.
You're not fooling anyone here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill Clinton and Republicans promised NAFTA would create jobs.. [View all]
livingwagenow
Feb 2014
OP
So a modified "US only" embargo? Should we put tariffs on Cuba when the embargo is removed?
pampango
Feb 2014
#19
According to the bureau of Labor Statistics, Clinton holds the record for jobs created
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2014
#5
Record jobs were created. Wages rose. -- He was just lucky. Democratic presidents just can't win. ;)
pampango
Feb 2014
#15
It's a simple question, "did employment and wages go up or down after NAFTA"?
Recursion
Feb 2014
#21
Because most entry level manufacturing jobs were outsourced, leaving older, more skilled workers
Romulox
Feb 2014
#29
Yup. And the entry-level people found higher paying jobs outside of manufacturing
Recursion
Feb 2014
#42
At much reduced rates of pay. You seem to forget that the past leads us to this point.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#71
Those charts don't speak to the 1,000,000 manufacturing jobs lost since NAFTA, MFN China.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#28
You aren't an honest debater. Manufacturing employment is down by almost 1,000,000.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#72
That never passed the smell test and they dropped that claim like a hot potato, switching their meme
Populist_Prole
Feb 2014
#8
The real power of NAFTA: it lowered wages for 20 years before it was enacted. And manufacturing jobs
pampango
Feb 2014
#13
Great link. Shows that AHI increased more in the 7 years after NAFTA than in the 20 years before it.
pampango
Feb 2014
#36
Poorly paid manufacturing workers in right-to-work states are not going to support our economy
pampango
Feb 2014
#56
As is typical, Perot was a republican politician who used existing trends to fear-monger.
pampango
Feb 2014
#20
He was correct, and Al Gore/Bill Clinton/CATO institute/Heritage/Pampango were wrong.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#27
Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit Detroit
L0oniX
Feb 2014
#45
Record numbers of American jobs were created under Clinton and he is scorned for NAFTA.
pampango
Feb 2014
#58
In terms of annual percentage increase, the best job-creation presidencies were:
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#62