Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(46,104 posts)

4. Trouble is there is no national standard for "natural".

Sat Feb 15, 2014, 01:04 PM

Feb 2014

There was a Supreme Court case in the Thirties (I think) that was about which products could be called "milk". There were products that were artificially constituted and called milk.

United States v. Carolene Products Co. ("filled milk&quot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/304/144

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jim Hightower: Shouldn't 'Natural' Foods Actually Be Natural? [View all] marmar Feb 2014 OP

What the fuck does "natural" even mean? longship Feb 2014 #1

natural is a bad word to use i agree dembotoz Feb 2014 #2

+1 n/t geomon666 Feb 2014 #3

+1 Silent3 Feb 2014 #5

Trouble is there is no national standard for "natural". no_hypocrisy Feb 2014 #4