Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
35. No, it's because I look at what the facts ACTUALLY are
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:22 PM
Feb 2014

instead of what I want them to be.
It's because I actually understand the laws regarding use of lethal force.
It's because I recognize that not being on the jury means I didn't get all of the facts.
It's because if I AM sitting on a jury, I am going to be damn sure I cover EVERYTHING before I send someone to jail for the rest of their life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think I'll hold my outrage NobodyHere Feb 2014 #1
it's pretty clear they think he was justified in killing Jordan Davis. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #5
It's certainly not clear to me what they think. NobodyHere Feb 2014 #8
they asked if justified vs one did that mean justified vs all geek tragedy Feb 2014 #15
NP. You do that and the rest of us will speculate since this is an open forum. Rex Feb 2014 #45
I'm sure you will continue to speculate NobodyHere Feb 2014 #51
Please, nice try but no pass go. Rex Feb 2014 #57
I get the speculation NobodyHere Feb 2014 #62
What is there not to get about it? Rex Feb 2014 #63
so you do not understand why..... Skittles Feb 2014 #79
SYG; getting away with murder again sakabatou Feb 2014 #2
it's the racist gun culture of the old slave states. nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #3
they do seem to have more than their fair share Skittles Feb 2014 #82
Here's a novel idea: waiting for the jury to come back with a decision Lurks Often Feb 2014 #4
and when they give their stamp of approval to the murder of Jordan Davis, you'll geek tragedy Feb 2014 #7
I will certainly be surprised at a not guilty verdict Lurks Often Feb 2014 #12
that's because you're not a slave state racist nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #18
No, it's because I look at what the facts ACTUALLY are Lurks Often Feb 2014 #35
the jury saw that Jordan Davis was black, that told at least one of them geek tragedy Feb 2014 #37
Typical of you, wild speculation based on emotion, unsupported by any facts n/t Lurks Often Feb 2014 #39
name one fact that indicates that the shooting of Jordan Davis was justified. nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #40
Waste of time...control freaks don't care about your opinion. Rex Feb 2014 #48
And where did I ever say it was justified? Lurks Often Feb 2014 #52
"Playing the race card" nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #69
Forget your own OP so soon? Lurks Often Feb 2014 #85
"Playing the race card"? Speaks to a certain preconceived bias on your part. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2014 #81
Yeah well...I HAVE been on one of these juries... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #71
Here is an idea, why not let the people that want to speculate, do so? Rex Feb 2014 #47
"control freak over every conversation on an open forum" Lurks Often Feb 2014 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author Rex Feb 2014 #59
Yeah it takes a million posts to prove one is...no you are trying to control Rex Feb 2014 #61
You must be even more bored to respond to posts that you decided to make yourself a part of n/t Lurks Often Feb 2014 #84
I suggest you quit the DU since "discussion board" is confusing to you. Or quit reading posts. n-t Logical Feb 2014 #83
Is the judge supposed to be making statements like that before the verdict is in???? nt MoonRiver Feb 2014 #6
nothing about that goddamn farce is as it should be nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #10
I was wondering about that too NobodyHere Feb 2014 #11
It seems to be setting up reasons for an appeal, should a guilty verdict be rendered. . . Journeyman Feb 2014 #20
I'm with you exboyfil Feb 2014 #22
That was my first thought as well, the judge should not comment on a verdict that is not decided Bjorn Against Feb 2014 #26
Is this the Dunn trial judge? Mz Pip Feb 2014 #9
Apparently it is. He should not be commenting on MineralMan Feb 2014 #16
OMG! I'm really starting to wonder how deep the fix is in Florida! MoonRiver Feb 2014 #27
This whole case makes me so angry. nt cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #46
Remember, there governor is a known criminal. Rex Feb 2014 #53
I think the headline in this OP using "likely" is wayyyy overstated. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2014 #28
That should be a sidebar issue or in chambers. MineralMan Feb 2014 #34
It's not within hearing of the jurors. X_Digger Feb 2014 #44
Most judges do not opine on jury deliberations at all. MineralMan Feb 2014 #49
Err.. how many cases have you been part of? X_Digger Feb 2014 #54
I've viewed probably 80% of this trial on Youtube channels. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2014 #60
Yes. As I said, there was not enough information in the article MineralMan Feb 2014 #64
I think you're correct, HBS. Sissyk Feb 2014 #41
Aren't judges supposed to tell the attorneys what the juries questions are during deliberation? It okaawhatever Feb 2014 #30
yes, check out cnn geek tragedy Feb 2014 #24
Try to contain yourself until the real verdict is reached... Lost_Count Feb 2014 #13
I hope the judge is wrong and it is a guilty verdict. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #14
Me too sakabatou Feb 2014 #17
Good grief!! bravenak Feb 2014 #19
Some of those jurors are probably getting avebury Feb 2014 #21
best outcome at this point is probably a hung jury, just call it quits and go home and geek tragedy Feb 2014 #31
Yup. I can see someone saying something along the lines of avebury Feb 2014 #36
Isn't this a violation of judicial ethics? Yo_Mama Feb 2014 #23
eh, it's Floriduh. Juries are morons, judges don't follow the rules, murderers geek tragedy Feb 2014 #25
Or if their victim is a tiny child. MoonRiver Feb 2014 #32
perp there was an attractive white woman nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #33
Didn't help Arias. But she was in Arizona, not FL. MoonRiver Feb 2014 #38
Florida prosecutors also failed to search Anthony's hard drive properly nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #42
I'll be shocked if this guy walks. Yo_Mama Feb 2014 #56
He'll get a slap on the wrist for shooting into the car geek tragedy Feb 2014 #68
They are all serious charges, but I don't think he'll get acquitted of the death Yo_Mama Feb 2014 #75
Just assume 1/5 white people geek tragedy Feb 2014 #78
No, it's the judge conferring with both counsels before answering a jury question. X_Digger Feb 2014 #50
Thank you so much! Yo_Mama Feb 2014 #80
syg is just a license to kill. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #29
WHAT. THE. FUCK??????? nt valerief Feb 2014 #43
At first upon seeing this I thought it was highly irresponsible of the judge Bjorn Against Feb 2014 #55
Thank you for this.... jaysunb Feb 2014 #67
That does make more sense n/t Yo_Mama Feb 2014 #77
I think this article was thrown together alsame Feb 2014 #65
How dare you be mad or have an opinion! Rex Feb 2014 #66
When will Florida stop electing RW nutjobs BootinUp Feb 2014 #70
Problem is the KKK members who serve on juries nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #73
I think it is majority white but not sure. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #74
HUNG JURY IS NOT AN ACQUITTAL SoCalMusicLover Feb 2014 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dunn trial judge: jury l...»Reply #35