Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dunn trial judge: jury likely to acquit him for shooting Jordan Davis [View all]Sissyk
(12,665 posts)41. I think you're correct, HBS.
He was giving his reasoning to both attorneys and the defendant on why he wanted to answer the questions the way he did. So far, he has walked a straight line so appeals would not be his doing.
I will wait until the jury reaches a verdict before I call them all racist. If they don't convict, then it's obvious.
I blame the Prosecutors, in part, for the length of the jury deliberations. Giving that many charges, options, pages of jury instructions, etc. takes time if they are trying to make the right decision.
I think (and seriously hope) Dunn is done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dunn trial judge: jury likely to acquit him for shooting Jordan Davis [View all]
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
OP
and when they give their stamp of approval to the murder of Jordan Davis, you'll
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#7
Typical of you, wild speculation based on emotion, unsupported by any facts n/t
Lurks Often
Feb 2014
#39
name one fact that indicates that the shooting of Jordan Davis was justified. nt
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#40
"Playing the race card"? Speaks to a certain preconceived bias on your part.
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#81
You must be even more bored to respond to posts that you decided to make yourself a part of n/t
Lurks Often
Feb 2014
#84
I suggest you quit the DU since "discussion board" is confusing to you. Or quit reading posts. n-t
Logical
Feb 2014
#83
Is the judge supposed to be making statements like that before the verdict is in???? nt
MoonRiver
Feb 2014
#6
It seems to be setting up reasons for an appeal, should a guilty verdict be rendered. . .
Journeyman
Feb 2014
#20
That was my first thought as well, the judge should not comment on a verdict that is not decided
Bjorn Against
Feb 2014
#26
Aren't judges supposed to tell the attorneys what the juries questions are during deliberation? It
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#30
best outcome at this point is probably a hung jury, just call it quits and go home and
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#31
eh, it's Floriduh. Juries are morons, judges don't follow the rules, murderers
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#25
Florida prosecutors also failed to search Anthony's hard drive properly nt
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#42
They are all serious charges, but I don't think he'll get acquitted of the death
Yo_Mama
Feb 2014
#75
No, it's the judge conferring with both counsels before answering a jury question.
X_Digger
Feb 2014
#50
At first upon seeing this I thought it was highly irresponsible of the judge
Bjorn Against
Feb 2014
#55