Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
8. We don't know who the attacker was.
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 01:00 PM
Mar 2012
Since Trayvon fought back against his attacker - his attacker had the right to shoot him?

Wait - Stalker AND Attacker. . . The 140 lb CHILD got the best of the 28 year old 250 pound GROWN MAN and then the grown man couldn't take it - and shot him - is that correct?


Bear in mind I am not defending Zimmerman because all the facts are not yet known.

But I will point out here that we don't know who started the fight.

And a 17-year-old "child" can beat you to death. There is a 911 caller and eye witness who claims he saw Travyon on top of Zimmerman beating him while Zimmerman called for help. You can here his account in one of the vidoes above.

Zimmerman was beaten.

Finally, being beaten can be justification for self-defense with deadly force.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 OP
There will be an investigation DearAbby Mar 2012 #1
Grand Jury CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #90
I can't wait for a Grand Jury and independent investigation, hopefully by the FBI. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #203
Or a murder CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #291
Sooooo JustAnotherGen Mar 2012 #2
We don't know who the attacker was. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #8
Yes we do... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #13
Don't bother. ellisonz Mar 2012 #36
why is that poster even here? cali Mar 2012 #49
Believe it or not... ellisonz Mar 2012 #57
"One of the more 'with it'?" Who are the others then, Charles Manson & Co.? 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #282
not "a" typical, but "atypical." Atypical = not typical. nt MADem Mar 2012 #70
"atypical", ie "not typical" muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #73
Wow. n/t DLevine Mar 2012 #82
I'm very interested in the facts. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #93
It appears you are not very interested in the facts. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #116
Because it wouldn't fit his liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #137
+1000 EmeraldCityGrl Mar 2012 #150
Everyone seems eager to talk about skittles and iced tea. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #168
Big deal! polly7 Mar 2012 #175
I'm not aware of any evidence of Zimmerman brandishing his concealed firearm. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #196
The person that got out of his car, and accosted a pedestrain minding his own busines initiated Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #270
"evidently beat Zimmerman pretty good" ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #177
If the police are lying or covering up that that is something that needs to come out. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #193
It's not self-defense in any case. polly7 Mar 2012 #200
"There is no reason why Zimmerman should not have had a fun." Duer 157099 Mar 2012 #220
Fixed. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #223
OK, I've got to stop you here because you are locked in to this Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #226
What evidence do you have that Zimmerman was beaten? yardwork Mar 2012 #230
very true Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #204
Zimmerman's call about Martin was almost the same as some of his other 911 calls csziggy Mar 2012 #292
I cannot find your link. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #151
Here is the link, or you can turn on headline news. They are playing ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #167
Thanks, I am reading it now. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #170
I have watched it. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #184
Where is the proof of "knowing there was a fight". Have the police released photos ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #187
You obviously haven't listened to the 911 tapes. Why don't you do that and then get back to us. yardwork Mar 2012 #256
OK. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #258
Thank you. The responding detective has been caught in numerous lies about this case. yardwork Mar 2012 #260
+1. Numerous people have presented facts that are being ignored by this poster. Wonder why. yardwork Mar 2012 #255
no you're not. not even a little tiny bit, dear. cali Mar 2012 #147
Funny because your OP is full of nothing but wild speculation. baldguy Mar 2012 #182
The speculation is that Zimmerman started the fight. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #188
Hung from a tree? Remarkable post. But he owns it, not you. freshwest Mar 2012 #165
Understand that I was talking about what happens to VIOLENT CRIMINALS. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #190
Who determines who the violent criminal is? ellisonz Mar 2012 #271
Thank you JustAnotherGen Mar 2012 #39
We don't know who started the pushing. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #97
So it is o.k. rufus dog Mar 2012 #179
Confront? Yes. Detain? No. Pull a gun? No. X_Digger Mar 2012 #183
This is why pro-gunners like myself have come to despise the pro-gun activists. ieoeja Mar 2012 #194
I listened to one of the 911 calls MagickMuffin Mar 2012 #48
Police reports corroborate the testimony. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #145
Police have been twisting and suppressing the investigation from the first hour Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #237
Where is the evidence that savalez Mar 2012 #61
Lots of places. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #140
What injuries did Martin have? savalez Mar 2012 #174
So one of Zimmerman's neighbors lied for him. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #123
I beat down a 300lb POS once when I weighed 175 snooper2 Mar 2012 #136
nope Maine-ah Mar 2012 #189
Thanks for posting the physical size differences life long demo Mar 2012 #250
"Whether or not Zimmerman should have confronted someone in his neighborhood" is not up for debate ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #3
That doesn't really mean much to me. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #19
Yes we do. You follow. You initiate. Simple. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #35
Get It Through Your Head, Sir: 'Neighborhood Watch' Has No Legal Authority What-So-Fucking-Ever The Magistrate Mar 2012 #47
Actually Zimmerman had the same legal authority as anyone else.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #172
Which Is None, Sir, Unless Witness To a Crime, Which Zimmerman Was Not The Magistrate Mar 2012 #207
Absent a pattern of following a person (harassment / stalking), no, it is not illegal. X_Digger Mar 2012 #219
Now You are Just Making Stuff Up, Sir; You Have Never Seen Me Argue Against Self-Defense The Magistrate Mar 2012 #229
Actually, I know my state's laws backwards and forwards, have followed as many cases as my westlaw.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #238
Perhaps, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #242
Being the "sole member" is not surprising. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #186
Which Just Says, Sir, Most People Are Not Fizzing With The Desire To Shoot Somebody The Magistrate Mar 2012 #212
You know You should watch an old movie call 12 Angry Men. You remind me of the man who had Justice wanted Mar 2012 #68
That is a perfect analogy! ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #103
His arguements HAVE to be Wingnut talking points. I bet we are going to hear a lot of this in the Justice wanted Mar 2012 #115
Lee J. Cobb played him beautifully. eom tledford Mar 2012 #158
"A neighborhood watch person following a stranger in your neighborhood does not start a fight." Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #232
You are right. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #234
So now we get to the WHY was Martin even followed in the first place? Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #239
Yes, we DO know who started the fight. Withywindle Mar 2012 #261
There was no neighborhood watch program csziggy Mar 2012 #293
Except he had the gun and he left his vehicle to pursue Martin Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #4
He was legally able to carry a gun. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #21
uh, so what? cali Mar 2012 #56
If I was being stalked there is no way I arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #102
We know EXACTLY what happened. He shot and killed an unarmed kid. Hugabear Mar 2012 #113
So you admit he left his vehicle XanaDUer Mar 2012 #114
Jesus Christ. Do you NOT understand liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #154
You are right. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #235
Starting the physical confrontation is irrelevant jeff47 Mar 2012 #267
Zimmerman is not on the short list for a MacArthur Foundation grant for his neighborhood watch work slackmaster Mar 2012 #5
You also forget DearAbby Mar 2012 #6
We don't know that. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #22
We Absolutely Know Who Started The Confrontation, Sir: Zimmerman. He Got Out Of His Car The Magistrate Mar 2012 #30
We know that Zimmerman started the fight. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #38
To what end? MADem Mar 2012 #84
Agreed! Wind Dancer Mar 2012 #143
To the end of guns uber alles, to the liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #163
You may be right. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #205
We DO know who the stalker was. We know that he was strangely obsessed with calling the cops. kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #60
this wasnt a cop. he has NO authority. the kid had a RIGHT to be there. that simple. was the kid seabeyond Mar 2012 #155
If Zimmerman laid hands on Martin to detain him, or took the first swing- that's the point it.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #180
This wasn't following jeff47 Mar 2012 #268
I'm not pretending anything- I'm just going by what has been reported / 911 tape, etc. X_Digger Mar 2012 #272
No, you're not going by what's been reported jeff47 Mar 2012 #276
Florida law doesn't support that contention. n/t X_Digger Mar 2012 #279
Because in FL, chasing someone is considered non-threatening? jeff47 Mar 2012 #284
Right XanaDUer Mar 2012 #185
You don't seem to be able to put yourself in the place of a polly7 Mar 2012 #159
it is indeed, "as it seems..." LanternWaste Mar 2012 #7
There is nothing wrong with following someone. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #25
Actually, Sir, There Is Something Wrong With Following a Person On A Public Way The Magistrate Mar 2012 #33
Yes, indeed there is-- legally, of not ethically. LanternWaste Mar 2012 #81
If this is true, then I stand corrected. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #86
Harassment / Stalking usually requires repeated incidents. X_Digger Mar 2012 #191
You are changing the facts to make your point. savalez Mar 2012 #121
We don't know who was the aggressor. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #161
Comprehension of the meaning of the word "aggressor" tledford Mar 2012 #164
Zimmerman became the aggressor/ predator EmeraldCityGrl Mar 2012 #178
Of course it does. savalez Mar 2012 #278
Except that he was NOT a "neighborhood watch captain." liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #160
That's not how I read it. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #202
I repeat that more than enough evidence has been liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #213
Zimmerman WAS NOT A NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH unionworks Mar 2012 #195
I had not heard this Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #198
from what I'mseeing unionworks Mar 2012 #215
For me, it comes down to this.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #9
If believe even pursuing him alone qualifies in that regard. TheWraith Mar 2012 #12
I don't know enough about FL case law to say, but ethically, I agree. n/t X_Digger Mar 2012 #14
Exactly. If Zimmerman initiated the altercation, all bets are off. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #28
I don't think the details of the fight really matter, actually. TheWraith Mar 2012 #10
We don't know that Zimmerman initiated the confrontation. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #31
Put yourself in trayvon's shoes JustAnotherGen Mar 2012 #46
He initiated the confrontation by pursuing Martin. TheWraith Mar 2012 #54
following and chasing someone is an aggressive act fishwax Mar 2012 #75
Yes and with a gun in his hand, too XanaDUer Mar 2012 #132
If Martin went on the attack as Zimmerman walked up to him then yes it does matter. Life Long Dem Mar 2012 #51
Unlikely as that scenario is at this point, I agree. n/t X_Digger Mar 2012 #197
It does seem unlikely. Life Long Dem Mar 2012 #277
No, actually it doesn't. jeff47 Mar 2012 #269
The kid had as much right to Stand His Ground as anyone else in Florida. eShirl Mar 2012 #11
+10000000 nashville_brook Mar 2012 #41
+ 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #64
thank you...end of story Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #94
That's exactly right. Ganja Ninja Mar 2012 #108
There you have it. tallahasseedem Mar 2012 #119
Some would love that to be the case. Rex Mar 2012 #15
The prey sometimes scratches a careless poacher before being killed. Zimmerman was an inept hunter leveymg Mar 2012 #16
So you think it's totally ok to follow and physically DFab420 Mar 2012 #17
Absolutely not. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #40
Actually, Sir, We Know Just What His Suspicions Were Based On: He Saw A Black Youth On The Sidewalk The Magistrate Mar 2012 #87
Careful zipplewrath Mar 2012 #18
Zimmerman still didn't need a gun Politicalboi Mar 2012 #20
Trayvon's mother barbtries Mar 2012 #29
Forensics should be able to determine who's voice is on the tapes. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #55
hopefully anyway they'll be able to eliminate the killer. barbtries Mar 2012 #224
I know Politicalboi Mar 2012 #62
that's my feeling as well. barbtries Mar 2012 #199
Weight does not always count for anything. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #50
Zimmerman chased him Politicalboi Mar 2012 #80
So let me get this straight... Oilwellian Mar 2012 #166
Yes. polly7 Mar 2012 #52
They were either covering their asses Politicalboi Mar 2012 #88
The S.O.B. was instructed by 911 to NOT get out of his car and pursue the situation. CakeGrrl Mar 2012 #23
I agree that he should have stayed in the car, but I'm troubled by how many think the 911 operator slackmaster Mar 2012 #37
Well, a lawyer on CNN this morning (I don't claim to know the ins and outs of FL law) ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #43
Sounded like a suggestion to me. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #66
Perhaps God Will Be Kind, Sir, And Give You A Chance To Shoot Somebody Someday, Too.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #96
Perhaps One Day You'll Stop With Your Pretentious Initial Cap Nonsense. closeupready Mar 2012 #216
An Incautious Observer, Sir, Might Conclude You Do Not Like Me Very Much.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #231
Have we ever met??? So no, closeupready Mar 2012 #248
Damn, Sir, That was A Lot Of Words.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #249
lol, you're welcome. closeupready Mar 2012 #251
I wonder if he felt threatened by the bag of Skittles? Or the can of Iced tea? ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #99
The Can, Ma'am: It Glittered, And All That Glitters Is Gun.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #110
Zimmerman called 9/11 ALL the time Politicalboi Mar 2012 #101
Yep jsmirman Mar 2012 #131
"We Don't Need You To Do That" = "You Have No Authorization To Do That" jsmirman Mar 2012 #128
A person who has no legal authority to tell you TO do something has no authority to tell you NOT to slackmaster Mar 2012 #135
Wrong, utterly fucking wrong jsmirman Mar 2012 #138
Zimmerman CHOSE to disregard 911's ADVICE and placed himself at risk slackmaster Mar 2012 #247
WRONG - he placed them BOTH at risk jsmirman Mar 2012 #286
You seemed to be suggesting that a 911 operator has some legal authority to tell people what to do slackmaster Mar 2012 #289
I think you are correct that a 911 operator has no legal authority jsmirman Mar 2012 #290
Reductio ad absurdum LanternWaste Mar 2012 #241
Reductio ad absurdum is a valid way of pointing out lack of substance in someone's argument slackmaster Mar 2012 #252
And btw, if he was carrying a gun AND jsmirman Mar 2012 #149
Why would anyone pursue a man who was not breaking the law? I think in this case.... Logical Mar 2012 #275
There is nothing wrong with following and confronting a person who looks suspicious slackmaster Mar 2012 #280
If you mean talking then OK. Confronting seems a little more extreme. If you are walking down my.... Logical Mar 2012 #281
I confronted two men on Monday. It looked like they were going to illegal dump a load of stuff... slackmaster Mar 2012 #283
No, he wasn't. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #58
Duty? Didn't I read that Zimmerman self-appointed himself as nightwatch guardian Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #111
Yes, Sir, You Did: 'Captain' Of A 'Neighborhood Watch' He Was Sole Member Of The Magistrate Mar 2012 #118
This Is Just the Initial Set Of Police Lies, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #24
We don't know who initiated the physical confrontation. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #69
We Absolutely Know Who Started The Confrontation, Sir: Zimmerman. He Got Out Of His Car The Magistrate Mar 2012 #100
Except Trayvon Martin had no gun and was 17. Jennicut Mar 2012 #26
That doesn't mean much by itself. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #74
Really? ProSense Mar 2012 #89
You Know, Sir, This Insistence On How Deadly Un-Armed People Are Is Rather Funny The Magistrate Mar 2012 #157
It's dark, you're alone, walking in a common XanaDUer Mar 2012 #171
An unarmed man vs an unarmed teenager. Jennicut Mar 2012 #295
forget that! KT2000 Mar 2012 #27
+1 polly7 Mar 2012 #32
Apparently, this minor was supposed to submit to the questioning of a man with msanthrope Mar 2012 #153
You know, I'd say, even if Trayvon Martin was walking on the common grass XanaDUer Mar 2012 #214
it's also clear that if Zimmerman hadn't had a gun... mike_c Mar 2012 #34
Riiight... kenfrequed Mar 2012 #42
bullfuckingshite of the worst order cali Mar 2012 #44
Please cite it. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #77
there you go. he expressed fear to his girlfriend and told her he was being stalked cali Mar 2012 #92
Right now the biggest damnation of Zimmerman Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #162
This is one witness EC Mar 2012 #45
His dad also said, prior to the 911 tapes coming out, that polly7 Mar 2012 #59
Really? Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #79
Sounds like desperation to make this kid to be some sort of Threat. This is a way for the PD Justice wanted Mar 2012 #53
So, the racist backlash begins. 6000eliot Mar 2012 #63
Bullshit. There is no defense for this racist pig. Hugabear Mar 2012 #65
So if a racist carrying a gun follows and starts a fistfight with a young black man, Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #67
Apparently, Sir, Our 'Atypical Liberal' Here Thinks So.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #71
The sum total of all your posts in this thread = RACIST APOLOGIST BS. kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #72
What in my posts would you consider racist? Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #83
OK, Zimmerman may have been a racist. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #126
If Zimmerman followed Martin and confronted him, then who is the aggressor? Stinky The Clown Mar 2012 #76
Depends on what you mean by "confronted" Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #85
re: "Do you get to kill some that you assault" cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #127
"confronted" cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #106
Thank you. X_Digger Mar 2012 #209
"These assholes always get away..." is all I needed to hear. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #120
It's worse than that. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #129
There needs to be a thorough independent investigation. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #78
I agree. n/t Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #91
Who needs facts when we have perfectly good outrage? Speck Tater Mar 2012 #95
sorry, we know a great deal about what happened as well as quite a bit cali Mar 2012 #104
I am in complete agreement! He should be in jail. Speck Tater Mar 2012 #122
Under what circumstances should Zimmerman not be held accountable? sadbear Mar 2012 #107
Then what would people do with their time around here snooper2 Mar 2012 #146
What a bunch of crap. EFerrari Mar 2012 #98
Bar fight HockeyMom Mar 2012 #105
True, but Trayvan didn't even enter this fight as a willing participant. polly7 Mar 2012 #125
I suspect it depends on who started it. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #208
If you were in a bar fight in FL, and tried to disengage, and your opponent pursued the fight.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #240
That is SICK. HockeyMom Mar 2012 #245
Sorry. There is no justifiable excuse for stalking and shooting an unarmed person. n/t Avalux Mar 2012 #109
Even if that person is on top of you and beating you up? n/t Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #130
Only if the other person started beating you up for no reason sadbear Mar 2012 #139
uh, yeah. cali Mar 2012 #141
Just because you're losing a fight does not give you the right to shoot ... Ganja Ninja Mar 2012 #152
Who pursued who? WI_DEM Mar 2012 #173
IF that happened, and I hope TM got some good licks in IF IT IS true XanaDUer Mar 2012 #225
No. chowder66 Mar 2012 #266
Yes, even if they are beating you up. jeff47 Mar 2012 #273
you have to be playin' blind to come up with this fascisthunter Mar 2012 #112
more like cali Mar 2012 #117
. fascisthunter Mar 2012 #124
I am not a freeper. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #217
What you are reporting is the first information that the Orlando Sentinel Baitball Blogger Mar 2012 #133
So you say Zimmerman was losing a fist fight with a kid SomethingFishy Mar 2012 #134
I'm not defending him. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #156
Zimmerman was out of bounds. mindem Mar 2012 #142
Good find sadbear Mar 2012 #144
Good posting. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #221
He is a cop wannabe chrisa Mar 2012 #287
Guns Guns Guns bpj62 Mar 2012 #148
Nope, Zimmerman was told not to pursue the boy and he did WI_DEM Mar 2012 #169
I think we do know who started the fight. Zimmerman was told to wait for the police to get there sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #176
Zimmerman has a history of domestic violence Rex Mar 2012 #211
Weeeee, let's all pretend we're Nancy Grace! just1voice Mar 2012 #181
Does Not Matter Xyzse Mar 2012 #192
I'll buy that. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #210
Agreed chrisa Mar 2012 #288
The man is a bully...who was a racist Bully...most likely still is...who violated his duties by not opihimoimoi Mar 2012 #201
Wow man this is like sooo atypical...... What a crock of shit. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #206
The police broke the chain of evidence by allowing Zimmerman to leave the scene. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #218
That is what I am hoping to see. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #222
Ridiculous. Why would the much bigger guy with the gun be crying on the tape? EFerrari Mar 2012 #227
I think forensics will save the day. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #236
And I think you are trying to turn the easily observable into controversy EFerrari Mar 2012 #243
There's playing devil's advocate, and then there's simple absurdity LanternWaste Mar 2012 #246
I agree. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #259
I believe he was handcuffed and taken to the station.. X_Digger Mar 2012 #244
I'm reasonably certain he was allowed to leave the scene with his gun. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #254
*nod* I had heard that as well. (or at least leave the station with it.) n/t X_Digger Mar 2012 #257
You are missing a lot of facts. yardwork Mar 2012 #228
Answers. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #233
All your "evidence" is the say-so of the Sanford police department, plus a confused witness. yardwork Mar 2012 #253
Trayvon's father never said it wasn't Trayvon's voice on the 9-11 recordings. girl gone mad Mar 2012 #285
Don't let the facts get in the way of your defending gun rights. Defend your gun rights above all. Electric Monk Mar 2012 #262
Please re-read my original post. n/t Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #263
I'm an advocate of 2a and self defense rights guitar man Mar 2012 #264
bullshit n/t RainDog Mar 2012 #265
Wow, your Gun bias is beyond belief....... Logical Mar 2012 #274
"When George Zimmerman was arrested..." CBHagman Mar 2012 #294
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #8