Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/the_kids/2014/01/organic_vs_conventional_produce_for_kids_you_don_t_need_to_fear_pesticides.html"When my son was a baby, organic was a synonym for edible. If the apples I found at the grocery store werent certified, I wasnt buying them. I knew that conventional produce could harbor traces of pesticides, and Id read that pesticides could affect brain development. Sure, the details of this association were hazyI didnt know how many pesticides my son might ingest from Shoprite strawberries, nor did I know whether that amount would do him any harm. But in a way, it didnt matter: Shelling out a bit more cash to minimize the risks, whatever they were, seemed worth it to me.
Fast-forward two years and my son is eating Shoprite strawberries for breakfast. I support the principles of organic farming, for sure, but it can be hard to consistently pay $7 for a pint of something hell go through in two days. Plus, I cant help but wonder whether giving my son organic food really makes a difference to his health, considering that hes been known to lick the bottom of his shoes, kiss my poop-sniffing dog, and eat crackerssomeone elsesoff of the preschool floor.
Instead of continuing to wonder, I decided to dig into the literature and talk to toxicologists, horticulturists, risk experts, and nutritionists to find out whether the chemicals in conventionally farmed foods could truly pose a risk to my child. What Ive discovered has totally surprised melets just say Im going to be a little more relaxed about what I serve kid No. 2.
...
What all this means for parents is that we should stop worrying so much about whether the apples we buy are organic or conventionalwe should just start giving our kids more apples. (And, sure, wash them when you can.) The Environmental Working Group agrees: In the first sentence of the executive summary of its 2013 Shoppers Guide to Produce, the organization points out that the health benefits of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables outweigh the risks of pesticide exposure. Whats more, irrational fears over conventionally farmed produce can introduce dangerous trade-offs. As University of Michigan decision psychologist Brian Zikmund-Fisher put it to me, If you dont feed your kid the right strawberry, what do you feed him? Ive walked into markets with a hungry kid and been so afraid to buy the conventional apple that Ive gotten him a snack pack of Annies Crackers instead. And I know there are parents who buy the Peter Rabbit Organics Fruit Pouches at Starbucks because they dont know whether the bananas on display are organic. These arent smart moves. It is far, far better for your kids long-term health to get them in the habit of eating whole fruits and vegetables, regardless of what type of farm they came from, than to give them pretty much anything else to eat, no matter how organic or all-natural it may be."
As has been noted at DU by others, we need a progressive movement focused on science, scientific consensus and reality. Bad hyperbole by denialists does not serve that end. It fights that end, and it's not serving the people to fight that end.
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]
HuckleB
Feb 2014
OP
I imagine accuracy in labeling may be perceived as a fear-mongering tactic
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#44
A reason to go "organic" is that is uses less resources (energy and water).
progressoid
Feb 2014
#10
Please explain how the post in that link is in any way "back to the real world,"
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#57
You seem to have a habit of obfuscating and trying to put words in people's mouths,
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#65
She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support.
HuckleB
Feb 2014
#82
"She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support."
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#84
I've come to the considered conclusion you're just trolling at this point. n/t EOF
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#90
Oh, small things, like pesticides really are deadly poison and highly destructive to critical
Zorra
Feb 2014
#55
When you find something that clearly isn't multinational corporate propaganda, I'll be impressed.
Zorra
Feb 2014
#67
Thank you for doing the background check - it never occurred to me that the author
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#125
Look up super weeds, which are actually a big problem. The fact that GMO pushers seem to be ignorant
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#110
NYT and Nature says GMOs are responsible. Ignorance doesn't mean "facts I don't like"
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#123
When studying something, oftentimes you can only determine the presence or absence of
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#40
Not by independent scientists. Corporations that control the patents control the studies
Berlum
Feb 2014
#49
Funny, I thought this was a left wing political site, not a Big Pharma/Farm site. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#83
Very true. But the existence of the atomic bomb demonstrates that sometimes science-based evidence
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#95
The article is an excellent example of bait-and-switch use of data to support a
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#51
I'm sure it is the same science that said tobacco was safe for you. I'll use the logic of its poison
Pisces
Feb 2014
#97
HuckleB you are most likely dealing with people who are convinced that neem oil
MattBaggins
Feb 2014
#126
For all intents and purposes your brilliant op is essentially a comments section
whatchamacallit
Feb 2014
#117
pesticide contamination of land and water never seems to be at issue in these discussions
G_j
Feb 2014
#124
My posting was in no way meant to collect all the recent studies on the subject
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#148
If you really are pro-science you're not doing science any favors with your posting style
Fumesucker
Feb 2014
#134