Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Remember when gungeoneers were happily crowing about 'Castle Laws' and 'SYG?' [View all]cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)79. Leave it to me to ignore your ability to ignore
context.
The thread and my posts in it were about The Second Amendment, and how it was meant to prevent the federal government from infringing upon my right to own a firearm. Of course one could twist themselves into a pretzel and say that somehow "promotes guns", and you've done it. I hope you stretched first; I don't want to be responsible for your pulling any muscles.
So you caught me. I promote guns, promote "toting", and promote lax gun laws. Oh wait...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Remember when gungeoneers were happily crowing about 'Castle Laws' and 'SYG?' [View all]
onehandle
Feb 2014
OP
Odd that so many gungeoneers reveal their true RW agenda and get tombstoned, eh? nt
rdharma
Feb 2014
#2
Pretty hard to cite "defendin' mah proppity!" in any of these so-called SYG cases.
Chorophyll
Feb 2014
#3
well they will be headed to the hosts forum shortly to demand this discussion be shut down.
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2014
#5
and as usual they are demanding this op be locked while posting in it.
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2014
#33
Before he pulled the trigger (10 times), you two would have called him a law-abiding, responsible
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#20
under florida law you can initiate a confrontation, get into a fight, and if things arent going well
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2014
#35
He knows his gun fanciers, and their desire to expand the instances in which they can walkb
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#25
He's won't back anything up. He's being eaten from the inside by GDS (Gun Derangement Syndrome).
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#36
You're more than welcome to explain how my small collection of locked up firearms
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#61
HOYT TO ME: "Cherokee, we wouldn't even need to debate guns if more gunners felt same way."
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#67
Problem is, like a number of you guys, you say something responsible on occasion and then relapse.
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#68
Yes, Oneshooter, you do directly or indirectly impact the actions of other gun fanciers.
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#78
Hoyt... I'll say it again, right here for all to see: You're a liar. You tell lies.
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#71
Here you are promoting gunz -- first post that comes up of many after Google search.
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#73
He knows his gun fanciers, and their desire to expand the instances in which they can walkb
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#26
Response to #39. Then, you gun guys -who could persuade Congress - need to do the responsible
Hoyt
Feb 2014
#40
Why are grabbers always looking at guns and thinking of other people's genitals?
hack89
Feb 2014
#50
Well, it certainly perplexes my wife, daughter and the other women shooters I know.
hack89
Feb 2014
#52
Quoting Carlin. Wow, gun humpers really have low abilities to take criticism of their manhood
Nanjing to Seoul
Feb 2014
#85
Blanket statements. Next time you smear Republicans, I will accuse you of what you accuse me of
Nanjing to Seoul
Feb 2014
#87