Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)55. Oh, small things, like pesticides really are deadly poison and highly destructive to critical
ecosystems, and the environment of the planet in general, are not "perfectly healthy for kids" like the article claims, and the author of that propaganda article offers no proof that accumulation of ingested pesticide residue is not a significant threat to humans.
And, oh yeah, DDT and Parathion were "harmless to children" and were legal until they they were found not to be harmless and were made illegal.
Australia:
Parathion methyl products now illegal
4 September 2013
The Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) has advised producers that they can no longer use parathion methyl on their orchards or farms.
DEPI Senior Chemical Standards Officer Steven Field said the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) has cancelled the registration of all remaining parathion-methyl products for use in Australia.
"A two year phase out period ended on July 26, 2013, applied to the supply and use of existing stock of parathion-methyl products," Mr Field said.
snip---
"Continued use of parathion-methyl products after the July 2013 deadline may also result in treated fruit being classified as contaminated and is an offence under Section 52AA of the Act to sell contaminated produce.
http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/about-us/media-centre/media-releases/parathion-methyl-products-now-illegal
4 September 2013
The Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) has advised producers that they can no longer use parathion methyl on their orchards or farms.
DEPI Senior Chemical Standards Officer Steven Field said the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) has cancelled the registration of all remaining parathion-methyl products for use in Australia.
"A two year phase out period ended on July 26, 2013, applied to the supply and use of existing stock of parathion-methyl products," Mr Field said.
snip---
"Continued use of parathion-methyl products after the July 2013 deadline may also result in treated fruit being classified as contaminated and is an offence under Section 52AA of the Act to sell contaminated produce.
http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/about-us/media-centre/media-releases/parathion-methyl-products-now-illegal
Child neurodevelopment
See also: Child development
Children are thought to be especially vulnerable to exposure to pesticide residues, especially if exposure occurs at critical windows of development. Infants and children consume higher amounts of food and water relative to their body-weight have higher surface area (i.e. skin surface) relative to their volume, and have a more permeable blood-brain barrier, and engage in behaviors like crawling and putting objects in their mouths, all of which can contribute to increased risks from exposure to pesticide residues through food or environmental routes.[25] Neurotoxins and other chemicals that originate from pesticides pose the biggest threat to the developing human brain and nervous system[citation needed]. Presence of pesticide metabolites in urine samples have been implicated in disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, behavioral and emotional problems, and delays in development[citation needed]. There is a lack of evidence of a direct cause-and-effect relationship between long-term, low-dose exposure to pesticide residues and neurological disease, partly because manufacturers are not always legally required to examine potential long-term threats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesticide_residue
See also: Child development
Children are thought to be especially vulnerable to exposure to pesticide residues, especially if exposure occurs at critical windows of development. Infants and children consume higher amounts of food and water relative to their body-weight have higher surface area (i.e. skin surface) relative to their volume, and have a more permeable blood-brain barrier, and engage in behaviors like crawling and putting objects in their mouths, all of which can contribute to increased risks from exposure to pesticide residues through food or environmental routes.[25] Neurotoxins and other chemicals that originate from pesticides pose the biggest threat to the developing human brain and nervous system[citation needed]. Presence of pesticide metabolites in urine samples have been implicated in disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, behavioral and emotional problems, and delays in development[citation needed]. There is a lack of evidence of a direct cause-and-effect relationship between long-term, low-dose exposure to pesticide residues and neurological disease, partly because manufacturers are not always legally required to examine potential long-term threats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesticide_residue
By the way, there was this correction at the end of the article:
Correction, Jan. 30, 2014: This article originally misstated that in none of the studies were the fruits and vegetables washed before testing. The USDA's Pesticide Data Program does rinse produce before residue testing.
Furthermore, the author is a former Global Products Manager for the Plastic Consumables Division of a huge biotechnology company called ABgene, which manufactures and sells molecular biology consumables to pharmaceutical industries.
Call me skeptical of articles in the MSM that appear to be propaganda for multi-national chemical corporations, and people who continually try to sell me corporatist marketing bullshit and call it science.
So, just curious; what are your thoughts these days on global warming/climate change?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]
HuckleB
Feb 2014
OP
I imagine accuracy in labeling may be perceived as a fear-mongering tactic
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#44
A reason to go "organic" is that is uses less resources (energy and water).
progressoid
Feb 2014
#10
Please explain how the post in that link is in any way "back to the real world,"
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#57
You seem to have a habit of obfuscating and trying to put words in people's mouths,
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#65
She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support.
HuckleB
Feb 2014
#82
"She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support."
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#84
I've come to the considered conclusion you're just trolling at this point. n/t EOF
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#90
Oh, small things, like pesticides really are deadly poison and highly destructive to critical
Zorra
Feb 2014
#55
When you find something that clearly isn't multinational corporate propaganda, I'll be impressed.
Zorra
Feb 2014
#67
Thank you for doing the background check - it never occurred to me that the author
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#125
Look up super weeds, which are actually a big problem. The fact that GMO pushers seem to be ignorant
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#110
NYT and Nature says GMOs are responsible. Ignorance doesn't mean "facts I don't like"
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#123
When studying something, oftentimes you can only determine the presence or absence of
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#40
Not by independent scientists. Corporations that control the patents control the studies
Berlum
Feb 2014
#49
Funny, I thought this was a left wing political site, not a Big Pharma/Farm site. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#83
Very true. But the existence of the atomic bomb demonstrates that sometimes science-based evidence
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#95
The article is an excellent example of bait-and-switch use of data to support a
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#51
I'm sure it is the same science that said tobacco was safe for you. I'll use the logic of its poison
Pisces
Feb 2014
#97
HuckleB you are most likely dealing with people who are convinced that neem oil
MattBaggins
Feb 2014
#126
For all intents and purposes your brilliant op is essentially a comments section
whatchamacallit
Feb 2014
#117
pesticide contamination of land and water never seems to be at issue in these discussions
G_j
Feb 2014
#124
My posting was in no way meant to collect all the recent studies on the subject
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#148
If you really are pro-science you're not doing science any favors with your posting style
Fumesucker
Feb 2014
#134