Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)68. I'm not pushing anything but good evidence.
Thus, uh, your claim about being curious goes wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]
HuckleB
Feb 2014
OP
I imagine accuracy in labeling may be perceived as a fear-mongering tactic
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#44
A reason to go "organic" is that is uses less resources (energy and water).
progressoid
Feb 2014
#10
Please explain how the post in that link is in any way "back to the real world,"
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#57
You seem to have a habit of obfuscating and trying to put words in people's mouths,
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#65
She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support.
HuckleB
Feb 2014
#82
"She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support."
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#84
I've come to the considered conclusion you're just trolling at this point. n/t EOF
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#90
Oh, small things, like pesticides really are deadly poison and highly destructive to critical
Zorra
Feb 2014
#55
When you find something that clearly isn't multinational corporate propaganda, I'll be impressed.
Zorra
Feb 2014
#67
Thank you for doing the background check - it never occurred to me that the author
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#125
Look up super weeds, which are actually a big problem. The fact that GMO pushers seem to be ignorant
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#110
NYT and Nature says GMOs are responsible. Ignorance doesn't mean "facts I don't like"
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#123
When studying something, oftentimes you can only determine the presence or absence of
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#40
Not by independent scientists. Corporations that control the patents control the studies
Berlum
Feb 2014
#49
Funny, I thought this was a left wing political site, not a Big Pharma/Farm site. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#83
Very true. But the existence of the atomic bomb demonstrates that sometimes science-based evidence
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#95
The article is an excellent example of bait-and-switch use of data to support a
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#51
I'm sure it is the same science that said tobacco was safe for you. I'll use the logic of its poison
Pisces
Feb 2014
#97
HuckleB you are most likely dealing with people who are convinced that neem oil
MattBaggins
Feb 2014
#126
For all intents and purposes your brilliant op is essentially a comments section
whatchamacallit
Feb 2014
#117
pesticide contamination of land and water never seems to be at issue in these discussions
G_j
Feb 2014
#124
My posting was in no way meant to collect all the recent studies on the subject
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#148
If you really are pro-science you're not doing science any favors with your posting style
Fumesucker
Feb 2014
#134