Isn't the Shill Gambit against a progressive, pro-evidence, pro-science world view?

[Chathamization]

18. Two of your responses were saying "derp", four more were calling people anti-science

So coming on here and complaining that people called you a shill, without mentioning what you called them, seems dishonest.

As for only dismissing people who were intellectually dishonest, these were two of the posts you responded to by saying they were anti-science:

"It's good evidence that corporate bullshit for profit exists, for sure. That article citing land use conveniently failed to mention that over 30% of the estimated 40% of land used for food production is pasture land used for livestock."

and:

"Organic foods have nothing to do with your vaccine obsession. n/t"

And two you responded to with "derp":

"Very true. But the existence of the atomic bomb demonstrates that sometimes science-based evidence is used to produce products that harm the environment. Science can be used for good or evil. Morally speaking, it is neutral."

and:

"I simply asked for a link. I thought that you were giving a website for me to look at. I didnt know I was supposed to google the term? What the hell does that mean explains everything? I simply asked for a link to what you were referring to. No need to be rude!"