Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hmmm JJChambers Feb 2014 #1
Please nobody chooses not to work rbrnmw Feb 2014 #2
No offense... greytdemocrat Feb 2014 #4
Your assumption is wrong YarnAddict Feb 2014 #6
Are you really arguing that everybody should be paid the same? Adrahil Feb 2014 #7
no that isn't what I mean rbrnmw Feb 2014 #8
Cool, I totally support a living wage... :) NT Adrahil Feb 2014 #12
Hmmm 87 posts?? rbrnmw Feb 2014 #3
Yes? JJChambers Feb 2014 #5
no but when someone claims rbrnmw Feb 2014 #9
No problem JJChambers Feb 2014 #11
that makes sense rbrnmw Feb 2014 #13
The highest I'm aware of was 94% in the 1940's. n/t AZCat Feb 2014 #21
Do you really think people are paid according to how hard they work? theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #15
In general, yes JJChambers Feb 2014 #16
Wow... theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #17
Noo JJChambers Feb 2014 #19
That's not what you said, nor what you implied theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #22
Wrong JJChambers Feb 2014 #23
Nooooo, Would you rather clean toikets or schmooze and nake deals over cocktails? Armstead Feb 2014 #25
It needs to ge muuuuuuuuch smaller Armstead Feb 2014 #24
And our President is fighting to fast-track the TPP and put SS cuts in the budget. woo me with science Feb 2014 #10
What level is acceptable to you? taught_me_patience Feb 2014 #14
What level of inequality would you find acceptable? theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author rbrnmw Feb 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Living Wages and Humanity...»Reply #14