Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
17. I'm irritated by the idea that the TN workers "owe it" to the UAW to join
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:43 AM
Feb 2014

I'm still curious what would have happened if a locally-run union had been on the ballot.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

was that the union's fault ? JI7 Feb 2014 #1
They may have been to concillatory with management is the argument el_bryanto Feb 2014 #2
" they may be " is this a guess? leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #40
Less a guess than me repeating what I have heard others say el_bryanto Feb 2014 #47
so then yes leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #49
Did you see Roger & Me? Recursion Feb 2014 #3
Bigger Picture gkagejr Feb 2014 #4
So what's the advantage to the worker in TN? Recursion Feb 2014 #9
There are still union workers building cars in Detroit Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #11
Under two and now three tier contracts Recursion Feb 2014 #13
Against the backdrop of how other union representation is doing in a losing battle Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #19
And, except for SEIU, show little interest in getting it back Recursion Feb 2014 #23
Employment rights, a negotiated contract roody Feb 2014 #35
Workers councils... TreasonousBastard Feb 2014 #38
Detroit was destroyed by NAFTA Notafraidtoo Feb 2014 #5
Detroit was long gone before NAFTA... Historic NY Feb 2014 #52
You just summed it up better than I have ever seen snooper2 Feb 2014 #57
The union didn't fail to protect the workers, the car designers did. JaneyVee Feb 2014 #6
Given that, what's in it for the TN worker to join? Recursion Feb 2014 #7
Democracy in the workplace. JaneyVee Feb 2014 #8
That's another reason reason I love unions Recursion Feb 2014 #15
Yeah your love of unions is abundantly clear. Union Scribe Feb 2014 #16
It is to people who know me Recursion Feb 2014 #18
My goodness. 2naSalit Feb 2014 #25
The city of Detroit's problems have everything to do with Wall Street Recursion Feb 2014 #29
Why didn't VW move its plants to Mexico? 2naSalit Feb 2014 #31
Unions are not for price-fixing purposes. WinkyDink Feb 2014 #43
UAW membership maxed in 1978. By then the industry was already moving plants to rural areas and the pampango Feb 2014 #41
Thanks for the clarification 2naSalit Feb 2014 #54
Employment rights, a negotiated contract roody Feb 2014 #36
Good point. Unions cannot always protect workers from management stupidity. That is not an argument pampango Feb 2014 #39
WTF? Your post is like saying 2008 financial meltdown Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #10
You don't distinguish between "caused" and "failed to protect"? Recursion Feb 2014 #12
Compared to other manufacturing sectors? Absolutely they have been Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #14
I'm irritated by the idea that the TN workers "owe it" to the UAW to join Recursion Feb 2014 #17
Zero negotiating leverage as opposed to quite a bit of Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #22
It's not the workers' 2naSalit Feb 2014 #28
Politicians might not have made such a fuss, elleng Feb 2014 #30
Oh, brother. You've not heard of "strength in numbers"? Ever wonder why corporations like bigness? WinkyDink Feb 2014 #44
WTF are you talking about?? Gman Feb 2014 #20
No. As demonstrated throughout this thread Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #21
That was one of Bob Corker's talking points. jazzimov Feb 2014 #24
So, why not address it? Recursion Feb 2014 #26
Do you even understand the role of unions? They don't run companies, cities, or financial institu- WinkyDink Feb 2014 #45
No one but management could have 'protected' 'Detroit' from their miserable decisions, elleng Feb 2014 #27
Right, that's my point Recursion Feb 2014 #32
Younger workers have jobs becasue of the older workers. And don't get me started on that. Too late: WinkyDink Feb 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author pa28 Feb 2014 #33
So I take it you would have voted "no" had you been a VW employee? pa28 Feb 2014 #34
Given the option of UAW or no representation I would have chosen UAW Recursion Feb 2014 #37
many workers melm00se Feb 2014 #42
Whether you're right or wrong, you're right Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #48
Oh! Thanks for the edit. Iggo Feb 2014 #50
Ask the first employee who voted against the UAW after Volkswagen fires him. Ikonoklast Feb 2014 #51
Why did he get fired? former9thward Feb 2014 #53
You'll have to wait for it to happen, but it will. Ikonoklast Feb 2014 #56
One of the available gains for VW in Tennessee would have been leaders of Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why would a worker in TN ...»Reply #17