Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mammograms - DO IT! [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)13. Good. Somebody should design and conduct an even better study.
Science is great that way. Build on what we learn, learn even more.
On edit: ugh, complaining that a long term study contains data on equipment that was in use when the study began is, er, a bit dishonest. Should we conduct long term studies starting off with the equipment that will be in use when the study ends?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As somebody who was detected before 49 and whose tumor was caught very early on by mammogram and MRI
Mass
Feb 2014
#2
I have no idea what "real observation" is that is not contained within
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2014
#12
What is dishonest about it? It is a fact that the equipment that was in use at the time
kcr
Feb 2014
#36