Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
23. It needs to be about more than money.
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 03:48 PM
Feb 2014

Money alone is not going to solve this issue. It's going to require a willingness to change the way we do things - to promote alternative energy, to stop doing the things that are increasing the effects of climate change. He can donate 100 million, or 100 billion... but unless we do these things, his money won't make one bit of difference.

I'm glad there's money on our side in regards to this particular issue - but what will be done with it? I'm curious also, as to what his true motivation is here. Perhaps he's simply intelligent enough to realize that climate change is as much a threat to him as it is to everyone else. Perhaps. On the other hand... I do not lightly trust the intentions or actions of the ultra wealthy.

One billionaire trying to make a difference is a good thing. It's going to take a whole hell of a lot more though, to truly combat climate change... and I honestly do not think we will do it. I believe we are in the last few decades of human existence as we know it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k&r nt steve2470 Feb 2014 #1
I think so, yes shenmue Feb 2014 #2
The rich would not be whining if they followed the example of this man. jwirr Feb 2014 #3
Of course it does, shenmue. Nothing wrong Cha Feb 2014 #33
In an ideal world, billionaires would not be able to buy political results Jackpine Radical Feb 2014 #4
In an ideal world we TBF Feb 2014 #5
But since it isn't a perfect world and taking... Walk away Feb 2014 #7
I'm a bit more cynical than you, I guess... Wounded Bear Feb 2014 #15
Right - that's about as TBF Feb 2014 #18
A Hedge Fund Billionare on MY side corkhead Feb 2014 #6
+1 1000words Feb 2014 #8
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #12
Bread and Circuses corkhead Feb 2014 #31
Okay. eom 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #32
Could be he's on his children's side. polichick Feb 2014 #24
with money on our side greymattermom Feb 2014 #9
Biggest Difference between Steyer & Koch: Martin Eden Feb 2014 #10
You think? LynneSin Feb 2014 #20
.... DeSwiss Feb 2014 #11
Bless my madam Deforge libodem Feb 2014 #13
Here it goes..... DeSwiss Feb 2014 #16
Just hazarding a guess here: Brigid Feb 2014 #14
Very good. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #17
It's sad we have to stoop to their level to fight back LynneSin Feb 2014 #19
NO. When a billionaire spends his money on a campaign to get money OUT of politics, then I'll approv reformist2 Feb 2014 #21
Sort of wish it was the work of Hollywood or something instead of a hedge fund guy... polichick Feb 2014 #22
It needs to be about more than money. davidthegnome Feb 2014 #23
You should check out the entire article. He is funding... Walk away Feb 2014 #26
It was... DirtyDawg Feb 2014 #25
The enemey of my enemy is my ally. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2014 #27
I'm glad you said "ally"... Wounded Bear Feb 2014 #28
I used that word on purpose. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2014 #29
Id rather that it was illegal for him to do so, bu OK. grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #30
I'll take a Billionaire who is fighting for our Environment and Cha Feb 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Billionaire on Our Side...»Reply #23