General Discussion

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)

28. I didn't see the threads you indicated.

Reply to senseandsensibility (Original post)

Tue Feb 18, 2014, 05:13 PM

Feb 2014

So I can't comment on the quality of the thread. I will say that sometimes there may be a reason to start a discussion other than salacious interest.

That said, I'd certainly agree that a content warning should be posted on all posts some might find offensive. And that should be the end of the matter. As long as Admin finds it appropriate, there should not be any brouhaha from the persons finding it unpalatable.

We have a definite problem with prudish folk attempting to censor this board. Once warned they can ignore the thread/post and let the rest of the community participate if they wish.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

113 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I see there's another one [View all] senseandsensibility Feb 2014 OP

Because someone told them they shouldn't. Iggo Feb 2014 #1

And it reminded them of Mommy or the nanny according to some.... bettyellen Feb 2014 #65

Well stated jehop61 Feb 2014 #2

You're welcome. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #14

Fair point JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #3

I think in evolutionary terms it's called sufrommich Feb 2014 #4

i always picture them as the 12 year old boy scurrying to put the magazine geek tragedy Feb 2014 #8

Like bonobos awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #94

it's their way of marking their turf--posting nudie or semi-nudie pictures to show the women geek tragedy Feb 2014 #5

Spot on. n/t demmiblue Feb 2014 #7

+ad infinitum. Yes, exactly. It's basically controlling behavior, and little to do R B Garr Feb 2014 #16

Good summary, thanks. bettyellen Feb 2014 #67

Thanks, and yes, I've noticed the link games as another way to stymie R B Garr Feb 2014 #92

They'll ask you to link to water being wet.... bettyellen Feb 2014 #95

+1 redqueen Feb 2014 #19

+1! CrispyQ Feb 2014 #80

It is sadly beginning to appear that there is a concerted effort to make women unwelcome ... etherealtruth Feb 2014 #85

I agree. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #86

not women in general, just those who talk back nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #87

Funny. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #6

And no guns. Lasher Feb 2014 #90

Wow, Gays can come out of the closet rustydog Feb 2014 #9

tell us, does it hurt to drive those nails through your own palms? geek tragedy Feb 2014 #18

Would you mind climbing down off the cross? Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #55

+2000 raven mad Feb 2014 #89

Let me know the next time you're beaten and attacked for liking scantily clad models, and maybe louslobbs Feb 2014 #59

Ouch! That stings! nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #112

Fuckin' A tea and oranges Feb 2014 #61

+1 n/t louslobbs Feb 2014 #63

Way to be offensive on multiple levels. JTFrog Feb 2014 #78

Some call being asked to act or speak in respectful ways censorship etherealtruth Feb 2014 #93

How about we draw the line at GD. intheflow Feb 2014 #98

You know what? I didn't even rec the OP originally, but I went and did it just because of this... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #113

The SI thread was started by a woman. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #10

so was the Eagle Forum. nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #21

Meh. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #35

by that you must mean Phylis Shlafly, the anti-pornography activist, right? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #96

Who started it? nt DURHAM D Feb 2014 #22

Here, post #26 tammywammy Feb 2014 #30

RiffRandell (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #33

Are you talking about the Kate Upton thing? RBStevens Feb 2014 #11

I think this seems to be an "issue"... Agschmid Feb 2014 #12

I honestly think it's little more than a few broken people finding entertainment LanternWaste Feb 2014 #13

There petulance aplenty to go around on the DU, it's by no means limited to one group Fumesucker Feb 2014 #17

but, but, but (no pun intended) Kali Feb 2014 #15

You calling me out, Kali? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #29

actually I was calling out the individuals who keep saying that. (see at least one example above) Kali Feb 2014 #32

Thanks, me too! nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #34

Take it up with the author of the OP. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #37

challenging presumptions - yeah! and civil disobedience, man! Kali Feb 2014 #39

Da fuq? (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #20

Manners are not encouraged by the corporate media, I agree. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #81

on this we are in agreement Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #23

The Christie fat jokes make me feel inadequate as a fat man. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #24

Good. WinkyDink Feb 2014 #45

But I certainly won't ovaryact to them. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #47

"ovaryact"? n/t tammywammy Feb 2014 #51

I was so hurt by his or her crassness that I made an unfortunate typo. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #52

So did you mean "ovary act"? tammywammy Feb 2014 #54

Thin allegation... LanternWaste Feb 2014 #83

why not use one of the other four options? hfojvt Feb 2014 #25

Much like addressing everything but the question asked in the OP. LanternWaste Feb 2014 #84

I just love being called irrelevant hfojvt Feb 2014 #97

You're slipping. redqueen Feb 2014 #107

well that's certainly a moronic and a$$holish response. hfojvt Feb 2014 #108

I'm the woman that posted it. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #26

Remember, Bikinis are oppressive, Burkas are liberating. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #36

Nope.. They're both bad... opiate69 Feb 2014 #53

No blame for me - in 840high Feb 2014 #70

There are several options if one doesn't like a thread or think its inappropriate quinnox Feb 2014 #27

I didn't see the threads you indicated. Feral Child Feb 2014 #28

LOL, that's cute. nt redqueen Feb 2014 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Feb 2014 #68

Admin apparently didn't find it appropriate as they locked it. JTFrog Feb 2014 #68

I'm not participating Feral Child Feb 2014 #75

Oh, you didn't really want any responses to your post I see. JTFrog Feb 2014 #77

Putting aside the issues the OP brings up, these threads are an amalgam of two subjects Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #38

I agree such topics don't belong in GD CFLDem Feb 2014 #40

It is not prudery treestar Feb 2014 #49

Six in one hand CFLDem Feb 2014 #56

It is very different treestar Feb 2014 #66

If by 'progressive' CFLDem Feb 2014 #72

How would women being equal be like returning to the Victorian Era? treestar Feb 2014 #73

And now women can have all sorts of careers CFLDem Feb 2014 #79

Thanks. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #57

"manshaming"? redqueen Feb 2014 #62

I thought the 'manshaming' was a real hoot. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #76

Then why weren't those SI pictures posted in the men's group? See how that works? R B Garr Feb 2014 #100

... CFLDem Feb 2014 #101

"Not for the rest of the party." Your local Democratic office has T&A posted on the walls? Squinch Feb 2014 #103

It's not posted CFLDem Feb 2014 #104

T&A is not posted in the local Democratic office because a loud minority is being Victorian? Squinch Feb 2014 #105

Why yes. CFLDem Feb 2014 #106

Have you ever heard the phrase "hostile environment?" I suppose that's just silly Victorians, too? Squinch Feb 2014 #109

That was most likely push-back because of certain perpetually outraged members. RC Feb 2014 #41

I don't know if that thread was blow back, but I think you make a great point about quinnox Feb 2014 #60

I for one am long tired of it. RC Feb 2014 #64

And you aren't the only one. I have seen many posts complaining about the same thing quinnox Feb 2014 #71

Exactly! RC Feb 2014 #82

Because there is a small group of little boys that are massively insecure and act out, constantly. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #42

I miss Fight Club aka Meta. neverforget Feb 2014 #43

Me too, it seemed to me that it fulfilled its purpose of drawing off the fighters Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #111

DU should be better than the Fox "News" site. Scuba Feb 2014 #48

I'll get the tape measure MisterP Feb 2014 #50

I agree with your post. It doesn't belong on GD � to the Lounge with it. brush Feb 2014 #58

Well put. I agree totally. idendoit Feb 2014 #74

Thanks for your post RainDog Feb 2014 #88

Thank you for this post. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #99

Thank you for your post, too. RainDog Feb 2014 #110

Oh, FFS. It is a discussion board. Some people want to discuss that and some don't. Reply madinmaryland Feb 2014 #91

Lot of immature people on this site, I'm learning.... PasadenaTrudy Feb 2014 #102