Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Yet Another Highly Misleading GCHQ/NSA Article From the Intercept [View all]
Yet Another Highly Misleading GCHQ/NSA Article From the Intercept
More technical disinformation
Charles Johnson
Here we go again. Another hyperbolic fear-mongering headline that is not supported by the actual article: Snowden Documents Reveal Covert Surveillance and Pressure Tactics Aimed at WikiLeaks and Its Supporters. Its an ongoing pattern of seemingly deliberate misrepresentations.
The premise of this latest breaking news bombshell by Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Gallagher is that GCHQ has been spying on people who visit the Wikileaks website, by collecting statistics with the open source Piwik analytics program. But if you read down to paragraph 20, you discover:
Thats right they do not know from these stolen documents whether this program was ever actually deployed in the real world. Yet the entire rest of the article does its best to give you the impression that it was, with subheadings like GCHQ Spies on WikiLeaks Visitors. Once again, this Greenwald piece deceptively conflates the ability to do something with actually doing it...more than that, the article contains these drastically incorrect technical statements about IP addresses
Wow. Folks, these claims are simply wrong in every sense...Internet Protocol addresses do not identify individual computers that connect to the Internet. An IP address is a unique number assigned to an Internet connection, not to the device using that connection. I have seven devices connected to the same IP address in my office...IP addresses cannot be traced back to specific people. Thats nonsense. An IP address can be part of a proxy system, for example, in which case there could be hundreds or thousands of people using the same address. Or it could be dynamic, in which case it could be different every time a person connects to the Internet. There is simply no way to get an individuals identity using only an IP address, as this article claims, whether not it is masked....When I tried to point out these things to one of the authors of the piece this morning on Twitter, heres the response:
- more -
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/43086_Yet_Another_Highly_Misleading_GCHQ-NSA_Article_From_the_Intercept
More technical disinformation
Charles Johnson
Here we go again. Another hyperbolic fear-mongering headline that is not supported by the actual article: Snowden Documents Reveal Covert Surveillance and Pressure Tactics Aimed at WikiLeaks and Its Supporters. Its an ongoing pattern of seemingly deliberate misrepresentations.
The premise of this latest breaking news bombshell by Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Gallagher is that GCHQ has been spying on people who visit the Wikileaks website, by collecting statistics with the open source Piwik analytics program. But if you read down to paragraph 20, you discover:
It is unclear from the PowerPoint presentation whether GCHQ monitored the WikiLeaks site as part of a pilot program designed to demonstrate its capability, using only a small set of covertly collected data, or whether the agency continues to actively deploy its surveillance system to monitor visitors to WikiLeaks.
Thats right they do not know from these stolen documents whether this program was ever actually deployed in the real world. Yet the entire rest of the article does its best to give you the impression that it was, with subheadings like GCHQ Spies on WikiLeaks Visitors. Once again, this Greenwald piece deceptively conflates the ability to do something with actually doing it...more than that, the article contains these drastically incorrect technical statements about IP addresses
The IP addresses collected by GCHQ are used to identify individual computers that connect to the Internet, and can be traced back to specific people if the IP address has not been masked using an anonymity service.
Wow. Folks, these claims are simply wrong in every sense...Internet Protocol addresses do not identify individual computers that connect to the Internet. An IP address is a unique number assigned to an Internet connection, not to the device using that connection. I have seven devices connected to the same IP address in my office...IP addresses cannot be traced back to specific people. Thats nonsense. An IP address can be part of a proxy system, for example, in which case there could be hundreds or thousands of people using the same address. Or it could be dynamic, in which case it could be different every time a person connects to the Internet. There is simply no way to get an individuals identity using only an IP address, as this article claims, whether not it is masked....When I tried to point out these things to one of the authors of the piece this morning on Twitter, heres the response:
- more -
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/43086_Yet_Another_Highly_Misleading_GCHQ-NSA_Article_From_the_Intercept
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you want to embarrass yourself by posting bullshit from dodgy sources, be my guest.
LeftyMom
Feb 2014
#17
Charles Johnson seems to have had an epiphany, cuz the site has changed in recent years
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#11
Yeah, he's tried to position himself as a bit more moderate than the loony right.
LeftyMom
Feb 2014
#15
Well, that's always a possibility. But it's going on about five years now.
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#21
People that dont know shit about TCP/IP Should not write articles. I can prove him wrong with one
Drew Richards
Feb 2014
#6
Greenwald? hes not a network engineer and besides I take everything that sleeze says with a grain
Drew Richards
Feb 2014
#14
I agree though, that the technology can decipher the computer OS, programs installed, etc. And most
freshwest
Feb 2014
#29
Wow, this has to be one of the laziest anti-Greenwald articles I've ever read.
PoliticalPothead
Feb 2014
#26
This article is factually wrong. NAT overloading typically occurs at the premise
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2014
#30