Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
29. I agree though, that the technology can decipher the computer OS, programs installed, etc. And most
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 12:41 AM
Feb 2014
people who use a desktop at their home address - land line - will take the tack that it does address them personally.
My modem connects to one computer, phone and cabled television at one addresss. It's me, not way around it. I've always known corporations and other entities can figure out who I am, as I gave them all the necessary data to rent my place, lease my phone and internet connection.

To do so I had to provide a lot of information that identifies me as a paying customer. It's justified as part of how they set accounts up to get paid, usually through banking.

The bank has one's social security and a lot more to extend that service, all they need to identify one. The only way to escape everything is to go 'John Connor' without any of the advantages of modern technology and privileges of a citizen, and live as an outlier.

I worked in outside and inside communications. I don't think people have thought this through. That's why I take the hysteria with 'a grain of salt.'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #1
Little Green Footballs is an acceptable source on DU now? LeftyMom Feb 2014 #2
Well, ProSense Feb 2014 #3
That's a pretty lame defense for linking to a RW hate site. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #4
Please, ProSense Feb 2014 #7
So he got a puff peice on his supposed disassociation with the fringe right? LeftyMom Feb 2014 #10
Stop trying to deflect with inaccurate information. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #12
If you want to embarrass yourself by posting bullshit from dodgy sources, be my guest. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #17
You're mistaken. It's you who continue to "embarrass yourself" ProSense Feb 2014 #19
The site actually was rather rightwing at the height of the Bush era struggle4progress Feb 2014 #18
I know about the site and its evolution. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #20
Dear Robert Spencer: Yes, I’m Being Paid struggle4progress Feb 2014 #16
Oh, right-- I suppose *you'd* consider it a "moderate" hate site. Marr Feb 2014 #27
No, reformed, like Greenwald claims to be. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #28
Charles Johnson seems to have had an epiphany, cuz the site has changed in recent years struggle4progress Feb 2014 #11
Yeah, he's tried to position himself as a bit more moderate than the loony right. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #15
Well, that's always a possibility. But it's going on about five years now. struggle4progress Feb 2014 #21
Yeah, fuck the GASbaggers. they don't have to be Cha Feb 2014 #5
"GASbaggers"? WorseBeforeBetter Feb 2014 #13
"GASbaggers" Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #31
.. Cha Feb 2014 #32
People that dont know shit about TCP/IP Should not write articles. I can prove him wrong with one Drew Richards Feb 2014 #6
If you ProSense Feb 2014 #9
Greenwald? hes not a network engineer and besides I take everything that sleeze says with a grain Drew Richards Feb 2014 #14
I agree though, that the technology can decipher the computer OS, programs installed, etc. And most freshwest Feb 2014 #29
+1. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #33
Kick! sheshe2 Feb 2014 #8
Evidently they were the least untruthful possible... Fumesucker Feb 2014 #22
You're comparing Greenwald to Clapper? ProSense Feb 2014 #23
A double standard is better than no standard at all n/t Fumesucker Feb 2014 #24
If you say so. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #25
Wow, this has to be one of the laziest anti-Greenwald articles I've ever read. PoliticalPothead Feb 2014 #26
This article is factually wrong. NAT overloading typically occurs at the premise DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yet Another Highly Mislea...»Reply #29