Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Juror in 'Loud Music' Trial Wanted Murder Conviction [View all]
Last edited Wed Feb 19, 2014, 10:35 AM - Edit history (1)
One of the jurors in the controversial Florida loud music trial is speaking out, telling Nightline in an exclusive interview that the issue of self-defense forced the jury into a deadlock.
Juror #4 who asked to be identified simply as Valerie said two and then three jurors ultimately believed Michael Dunn was justified in the 2012 shooting death of Jordan Davis. Valerie, who wanted a conviction, says the group knew within the first hour that they would be unable to reach a unanimous decision.
The first thing jurors did when handed the case was turn to page 25 in the jury instructions, she said. The question: do you believe that Michael Dunn was justified or unjustified in the murder of Jordan Davis?
"It said if he believed that he had an eminent threat to himself or his fiancee, so that was a thing that those two folks believed he was frightened and there was no other option for him in regards to Mr. Davis, Valerie said. The rest of us were 100 percent sure, you didn't have to react [with gunfire], you could have had another option.
Juror #4 who asked to be identified simply as Valerie said two and then three jurors ultimately believed Michael Dunn was justified in the 2012 shooting death of Jordan Davis. Valerie, who wanted a conviction, says the group knew within the first hour that they would be unable to reach a unanimous decision.
The first thing jurors did when handed the case was turn to page 25 in the jury instructions, she said. The question: do you believe that Michael Dunn was justified or unjustified in the murder of Jordan Davis?
"It said if he believed that he had an eminent threat to himself or his fiancee, so that was a thing that those two folks believed he was frightened and there was no other option for him in regards to Mr. Davis, Valerie said. The rest of us were 100 percent sure, you didn't have to react [with gunfire], you could have had another option.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/juror-loud-music-trial-wanted-murder-conviction/story?id=22571068
Video here >>> http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/loud-music-trial-juror-speaks-22574993
SMDH
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"It said if he believed that he had an eminent threat to himself or his fiancee, so that was a thing
JI7
Feb 2014
#2
Florida should be held in perjury of the Constitution which promises the government will provide for
world wide wally
Feb 2014
#14
Isn't "beyond a reasonable doubt" the standard for the prosecution, not the defense?
Bazinga
Feb 2014
#26
there is no honest, intelligent interpretation of a guy yelling at kids in a car and then shooting
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#20
problem is, all it takes is a couple of gun humping racist cowards on the jury
Skittles
Feb 2014
#81
because Dunn shot into the vehicle as it was fleeing. SD clearly could not be applied at that point.
magical thyme
Feb 2014
#47
Can anyone give, or direct me to, a summary of the evidence on whether Davis got out?
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2014
#39
Thanks - if he was shot in the car, then the 'imminent threat' wasn't there
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2014
#58
3 Jurors out of 12 is 25%, which is a percentage we all have heard about before.
John1956PA
Feb 2014
#49
FWIW I wanted you to be right and me be wrong, I've just given up after Zimmerman
uponit7771
Feb 2014
#63
Impossible: Many very knowledgeable DU lawyers insisted that it was Murder 1 v Murder 2!!!
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2014
#64
There was an unsurprising confluence between those arguing that the jury was deadlocked
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2014
#66
it was obvious, and those of us who said "racists seeing it as justified" were
geek tragedy
Feb 2014
#75