Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

markpkessinger

(8,935 posts)

2. Talking about the Democratic Superfund's decision . . .

Reply to DJ Lance Rock (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 19, 2014, 08:41 AM

Feb 2014

. . . to reserve much of its spending for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. As O'Donnell points out, they really had better focus on 2014, given that Republican PACs are spending on that race in unprecedented levels. He also says -- quite rightly -- that if Republicans are permitted to take the Senate in 2014, it will render a Hillary (or any Democratic presidential candidate's) victory in 2016 pointless in any case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawrence O'Donnell: "Worst political strategy idea of the year" goes to Democrats . . . [View all] markpkessinger Feb 2014 OP

A link? No summary? DJ Lance Rock Feb 2014 #1

Talking about the Democratic Superfund's decision . . . markpkessinger Feb 2014 #2

Do the (party insider) math: If it goes well in 2014... JHB Feb 2014 #4

Concur.... Adrahil Feb 2014 #6

It isn't so much about turning the House blue as it is keeping the Senate blue n/t markpkessinger Feb 2014 #9

Two things.... Adrahil Feb 2014 #11

Disagree . . . markpkessinger Feb 2014 #12

Fair enough. Adrahil Feb 2014 #13

If we lose the Senate in 2014 . . . markpkessinger Feb 2014 #14

Well, my thought is... Adrahil Feb 2014 #17

Do. Republicans. Sit. Out. Elections? hatrack Feb 2014 #21

I'd love to hear your strategy and analysis.... Adrahil Feb 2014 #24

Is that true? (the "don't need a ton of money for GOTV effort" part) JHB Feb 2014 #25

Maybe that's what those big donors want.. a figurehead Hilary Clinton president.. nenagh Feb 2014 #8

I'm hoping they learned that bashing the left isn't a great strategy for the mid-terms Chathamization Feb 2014 #10

Oh jeez - The Stupid is Uber Strong with the Dem Superfundies Berlum Feb 2014 #16

Something about a superpac seveneyes Feb 2014 #3

2014 Election liberal from boston Feb 2014 #22

Here is an early post and article about this: Are_grits_groceries Feb 2014 #5

They're also blowing it unless they campaign on Medicare for All. Loudly Feb 2014 #7

If fucking 2014 over is the price of having a Clinton candidacy, let's skip that candidacy Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #15

Couldn't agree more with your headline hatrack Feb 2014 #23

It seems obvious to this cynic that the Democratic leadership in this country doesn't want to win. Scuba Feb 2014 #18

That's pretty much what I am left to conclude as well n/t markpkessinger Feb 2014 #19

I'm assuming the decision not to run anyone against Jeff Sessions bullwinkle428 Feb 2014 #20

That is how we "lost" NC in 2010 unc70 Feb 2014 #26

WWHDD? MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #27

WWHDD? TinkerTot55 Feb 2014 #28