Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
110. Thank you for your post, too.
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 05:27 PM
Feb 2014

I understand both sides.

My bg is somewhat different than others here. My (now former) sister-in-law, in Europe would go with her husband and kids and go topless on the beach. It was no big deal, but she didn't do so around her parents because it would freak them out.

Her peers, and her kids, etc. didn't get all bothered by this different standard. So sometimes I feel like it's a question of... who are your peers here - and who is coming from another space in this world.

I agree that it's annoying, as a female, to be told how you are supposed to respond to something related to, say, female nudity. The example above explains why. I used to go topless on the beach near where I lived, too, because it was allowed. I wasn't walking around all over the place, etc. just minding my business reading on a blanket in the sun to tan with no lines. Other women did the same. It wasn't a big deal.

My post was sort of an attempt to find a way for both povs to co-exist.

I have friends from other parts of the country and swimming naked was part of growing up - mixed groups, male, female, and there wasn't any big deal about it. Lots of different places this is part of life and no one is crippled by showing their bits.

but one time some guys from another part of the beach wandered into the area and made comments to me that really pissed me off - because they weren't abiding by the idea that I had the right to wear what I wanted in that space without them making me feel like they could say something about their reaction.. to me. that was long ago, before two children, and a lot of life. I wouldn't do that anymore, tho I have gone skinny dipping in a private lake place where I am - but not around my kids, either. so, I have sort of a mix of attitudes, probably.

I find the attacks made here by those who position themselves as "the feminists" are often more off putting than useful, so a lot of times I just have no desire to participate in what they're talking about because they're framing things in such a way... and then to read what basically comes down to "shut up and listen to us tell you how to think" is REALLY, REALLY annoying and offensive because I don't think they know enough to tell me what to think. I am perfectly capable of thinking for myself. But I saw that exact statement here in relation to this... from someone also claiming humans aren't apes. so I'm like... really? You think you know enough to tell me what my reactions are supposed to be when you're so off base?

There was one time, long ago, when a well-loved person from that group attacked a lesbian who was doing her graduate studies in economics, saying that the reason the econ femme didn't get upset about treating sex work as work is because that person had stated she was a stripper and then changed the post. This well-loved person from that group was disgusting in the way she made accusations against that woman... what, are you ashamed? trying to hide you're a stripper? blahblahblah... and the reality is that the well-loved hoffer had confused two people on the thread. But that didn't stop her from this badgering sort of attempt at insult that you still see here in other ways with other people. And, the point, really, is that if a woman is a feminist, she's not going to attack other women for the work they do, even if it involves having no or few clothes on - because that's not feminism - that's using feminism for the same sort of attitude you see among social conservatives.

I think a lot of what passes as feminism here is social conservatism but people haven't had a chance, maybe, to step outside of their own culture to see something for what it is, rather than the "radical" label they put on it to justify the same old same old judgmental attitudes of some women toward others. -- and so often it relates to fashion and other really, really worthless topics, when the red meat of oppression right now is in the political/religious discourse from Republicans.

who wants that sort of feminism?

And the people who have insulted me, and others here, the most, and have gone through this board with a scorched earth policy of nastiness - they're all self-proclaimed feminists. If they want others to be polite to them, they need to be polite to others. They don't get to claim "I'm a woman so I can say what a man can't" and get away with it. It's really sexist in its own way. That's why I don't get riled up about language usage, unless it's direct insults.

If it's direct insults - it doesn't have to have what are viewed as curse words as part of it.

It also disgusts me to see someone trying to smear another person here as racist because they don't think posting the swimsuit issue is a big deal. But this, too, is someone who constantly insults others here. Yet if someone were to do the same to her, it would, no doubt, be because of sexism, not because she has acted like a jerk.

what I see now is that these same people are trying to use the example of racism to justify their judgmental attitudes. It's sad because it cheapens the issue of racism, but, as you know, some women here are "dirty fighters" not ethical ones.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I see there's another one [View all] senseandsensibility Feb 2014 OP
Because someone told them they shouldn't. Iggo Feb 2014 #1
And it reminded them of Mommy or the nanny according to some.... bettyellen Feb 2014 #65
Well stated jehop61 Feb 2014 #2
You're welcome. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #14
Fair point JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #3
I think in evolutionary terms it's called sufrommich Feb 2014 #4
i always picture them as the 12 year old boy scurrying to put the magazine geek tragedy Feb 2014 #8
Like bonobos awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #94
it's their way of marking their turf--posting nudie or semi-nudie pictures to show the women geek tragedy Feb 2014 #5
Spot on. n/t demmiblue Feb 2014 #7
+ad infinitum. Yes, exactly. It's basically controlling behavior, and little to do R B Garr Feb 2014 #16
Good summary, thanks. bettyellen Feb 2014 #67
Thanks, and yes, I've noticed the link games as another way to stymie R B Garr Feb 2014 #92
They'll ask you to link to water being wet.... bettyellen Feb 2014 #95
+1 redqueen Feb 2014 #19
+1! CrispyQ Feb 2014 #80
It is sadly beginning to appear that there is a concerted effort to make women unwelcome ... etherealtruth Feb 2014 #85
I agree. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #86
not women in general, just those who talk back nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #87
Funny. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #6
And no guns. Lasher Feb 2014 #90
Wow, Gays can come out of the closet rustydog Feb 2014 #9
tell us, does it hurt to drive those nails through your own palms? geek tragedy Feb 2014 #18
Would you mind climbing down off the cross? Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #55
+2000 raven mad Feb 2014 #89
Let me know the next time you're beaten and attacked for liking scantily clad models, and maybe louslobbs Feb 2014 #59
Ouch! That stings! nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #112
Fuckin' A tea and oranges Feb 2014 #61
+1 n/t louslobbs Feb 2014 #63
Way to be offensive on multiple levels. JTFrog Feb 2014 #78
Some call being asked to act or speak in respectful ways censorship etherealtruth Feb 2014 #93
How about we draw the line at GD. intheflow Feb 2014 #98
You know what? I didn't even rec the OP originally, but I went and did it just because of this... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #113
The SI thread was started by a woman. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #10
so was the Eagle Forum. nt geek tragedy Feb 2014 #21
Meh. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #35
by that you must mean Phylis Shlafly, the anti-pornography activist, right? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #96
Who started it? nt DURHAM D Feb 2014 #22
Here, post #26 tammywammy Feb 2014 #30
RiffRandell (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #33
Are you talking about the Kate Upton thing? RBStevens Feb 2014 #11
I think this seems to be an "issue"... Agschmid Feb 2014 #12
I honestly think it's little more than a few broken people finding entertainment LanternWaste Feb 2014 #13
There petulance aplenty to go around on the DU, it's by no means limited to one group Fumesucker Feb 2014 #17
but, but, but (no pun intended) Kali Feb 2014 #15
You calling me out, Kali? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #29
actually I was calling out the individuals who keep saying that. (see at least one example above) Kali Feb 2014 #32
Thanks, me too! nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #34
Take it up with the author of the OP. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #37
challenging presumptions - yeah! and civil disobedience, man! Kali Feb 2014 #39
Da fuq? (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #20
Manners are not encouraged by the corporate media, I agree. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #81
on this we are in agreement Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #23
The Christie fat jokes make me feel inadequate as a fat man. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #24
Good. WinkyDink Feb 2014 #45
But I certainly won't ovaryact to them. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #47
"ovaryact"? n/t tammywammy Feb 2014 #51
I was so hurt by his or her crassness that I made an unfortunate typo. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #52
So did you mean "ovary act"? tammywammy Feb 2014 #54
Thin allegation... LanternWaste Feb 2014 #83
why not use one of the other four options? hfojvt Feb 2014 #25
Much like addressing everything but the question asked in the OP. LanternWaste Feb 2014 #84
I just love being called irrelevant hfojvt Feb 2014 #97
You're slipping. redqueen Feb 2014 #107
well that's certainly a moronic and a$$holish response. hfojvt Feb 2014 #108
I'm the woman that posted it. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #26
Remember, Bikinis are oppressive, Burkas are liberating. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #36
Nope.. They're both bad... opiate69 Feb 2014 #53
No blame for me - in 840high Feb 2014 #70
There are several options if one doesn't like a thread or think its inappropriate quinnox Feb 2014 #27
I didn't see the threads you indicated. Feral Child Feb 2014 #28
LOL, that's cute. nt redqueen Feb 2014 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Feb 2014 #68
Admin apparently didn't find it appropriate as they locked it. JTFrog Feb 2014 #68
I'm not participating Feral Child Feb 2014 #75
Oh, you didn't really want any responses to your post I see. JTFrog Feb 2014 #77
Putting aside the issues the OP brings up, these threads are an amalgam of two subjects Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #38
I agree such topics don't belong in GD CFLDem Feb 2014 #40
It is not prudery treestar Feb 2014 #49
Six in one hand CFLDem Feb 2014 #56
It is very different treestar Feb 2014 #66
If by 'progressive' CFLDem Feb 2014 #72
How would women being equal be like returning to the Victorian Era? treestar Feb 2014 #73
And now women can have all sorts of careers CFLDem Feb 2014 #79
Thanks. senseandsensibility Feb 2014 #57
"manshaming"? redqueen Feb 2014 #62
I thought the 'manshaming' was a real hoot. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #76
Then why weren't those SI pictures posted in the men's group? See how that works? R B Garr Feb 2014 #100
... CFLDem Feb 2014 #101
"Not for the rest of the party." Your local Democratic office has T&A posted on the walls? Squinch Feb 2014 #103
It's not posted CFLDem Feb 2014 #104
T&A is not posted in the local Democratic office because a loud minority is being Victorian? Squinch Feb 2014 #105
Why yes. CFLDem Feb 2014 #106
Have you ever heard the phrase "hostile environment?" I suppose that's just silly Victorians, too? Squinch Feb 2014 #109
That was most likely push-back because of certain perpetually outraged members. RC Feb 2014 #41
I don't know if that thread was blow back, but I think you make a great point about quinnox Feb 2014 #60
I for one am long tired of it. RC Feb 2014 #64
And you aren't the only one. I have seen many posts complaining about the same thing quinnox Feb 2014 #71
Exactly! RC Feb 2014 #82
Because there is a small group of little boys that are massively insecure and act out, constantly. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #42
I miss Fight Club aka Meta. neverforget Feb 2014 #43
Me too, it seemed to me that it fulfilled its purpose of drawing off the fighters Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #111
DU should be better than the Fox "News" site. Scuba Feb 2014 #48
I'll get the tape measure MisterP Feb 2014 #50
I agree with your post. It doesn't belong on GD — to the Lounge with it. brush Feb 2014 #58
Well put. I agree totally. idendoit Feb 2014 #74
Thanks for your post RainDog Feb 2014 #88
Thank you for this post. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #99
Thank you for your post, too. RainDog Feb 2014 #110
Oh, FFS. It is a discussion board. Some people want to discuss that and some don't. Reply madinmaryland Feb 2014 #91
Lot of immature people on this site, I'm learning.... PasadenaTrudy Feb 2014 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I see there's another one»Reply #110