General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There was a point to it, you know [View all]Squinch
(59,757 posts)ignore. I say that the one who is voicing his objections is Manny and by your rules the onus is on him to ignore, you say that is projection.
Okie dokie, then.
"Those that won't commit to discuss the TPP or XL Pipeline." I guess you have been appointed the police of which issues are allowed to be discussed here (.. in your mind...)
And finally, though you admit that you have no idea who does the most alerting, you have decided that you will be mad at a particular group for alerting. Even though you don't know if they do a lot of alerting. But still they make you mad with all that alerting. That you don't know if they do.
Enjoy the silliness. I'm sure there will be more thought spirals in your response to this, but I don't have any interest in pursuing this conversation further.