Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
13. Because ...
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:14 AM
Feb 2014

President Obama's taking the CCPI out of his 2015 Budget because "it's still on the table."

Well ...

Perhaps if someone explained WHY CCPI won't go anywhere ...





And WHY the gop can't take up the carrot And, WHY President Obama (and team) have instituted a great strategy on this issue, people will be less outraged ... I'm pretty certain no one has explained it before. Wait! What? ...




Look at the polling, Democrats and the rest of the Left hate them (the gop); but more importantly, (and I’ve written this so many times, all I have to do a push control-V) a solid plurality of Independent voters AND republican voters (a solid majority, when taken together) see the gop as the party unwilling to compromise; and therefore, the reason nothing is getting done in Washington.

In order to flip the House (because of gerrymandering) and expand the Senate in 2014, Democrats need this cohort of Independent voters and republican voters to either: vote Democratic (which is unlikely); to vote 3rd-party (which will reduce the gerrymandering effect, as it will dilute the gop vote more so than the Democratic vote); or to stay home.

Enter President Obama’s Budget Proposal that included the CCPI … to the Left, it’s Hair On Fire time because NO REAL DEMOCRAT would ever propose “cutting ‘entitlement’ programs”; but look at it from the POV of the target cohort … they see President Obama (and by extension, Democrats) as willing to move on “entitlements” IF the gop is willing to move on taxes (i.e., COMPROMISE). (It is only the Left that is viewing CCPI in isolation). And what is the cohort seeing … the gop continuing to refuse to compromise (that’s what the polling is saying).

Does this strategy risk, disillusioned Democrats sitting home? … Well, yes. And some on the Left are, seemingly, doing everything in their power to make that happen, with their constant President Obama is (and by extension, Democrats are) sell-out devil(s)” mantras, without pointing out that President Obama is not running for office, AND by not pointing out what Democrats (that ARE/will be running) are actually saying … which goes from Pelosi’s, “We’ll consider CCPI; BUT ONLY IF the gop GIVES on taxes” to Markey’s (and the majority of the Democratic Caucsus’) “Hell NO … Leave SS and Medicare alone.”

While I, personally, think that the Pelosi/President Obama position is the wiser strategy, 18 months out from the election, as it continues to reinforce what the targeted cohort already believes … that the gop is unwilling to compromise, Democrats saying “Hell NO!” signals that SS and Medicare will not/cannot be touched.

So Message to the “Hold ‘em accountable” Left and waivering Democrats:

Stop saying/promoting President Obama’s Budget Proposal as merely CCPI (and a few other “anti-Democratic” positions) and help the Democratic Party’s cause by, at a minimum, stating what the Democrats in Congress are actually saying!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251304468




And ...




Here let me spell it out for you one more, again …

Why it hurts republicans …

Republicans demand movement on “entitlements” … President Obama places on the table CCPI … the left freaks out (showing that President Obama is acting against his base, i.e., willing to compromise) … But the offer comes with a demand for more revenue (something that the left ignores during their freak out) … republicans are caught in a pickle; if they accept the CCPI along with the increased revenue, they face a primary challenge because they caved on tax increases AND they are hurt with a significant portion of their mid-term base - the elderly. If they vote against the CCPI, they face a primary because they didn’t cut “entitlements” AND they are hurt with those fed-up republicans and independents that want to see governance, if not compromise, by once again proving the “obstructionist” label, true. The republicans have, once again, refused to take what they asked for.

Now, why it won’t hurt Democrats …

Listen to what sitting Democratic legislators are actually saying about CCPI … Those in safe districts are saying “CCPI? Hell no!” Those in purplish districts and the Democratic leadership are saying, “CCPI? Well, we’ll think about it (against my base’s wishes); but only if the republicans will give in on significant revenue.” Republicans will not do the level of revenue required for CCPI to be put to a vote in the House or the Senate, nor will they do sufficient revenue for President Obama to sign the thing into law.

So fear not … CCPI is going nowhere except to further damage the republican party.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3904206



Maybe folk will listen this time ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There seems to be DU angst regarding ... [View all] 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 OP
No real Democrat would ever propose cutting entitlement programs? Lasher Feb 2014 #1
Did you read and/or think ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #3
I read what was written and I understand what you're trying to say. Lasher Feb 2014 #4
"I just don't disagree with this pretzel logic" ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #7
Well said Isoldeblue Feb 2014 #2
I initially posted this more than a year ago ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #5
solid work there Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #6
The funny thing ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #8
It's not just new revenue, but a poverty exception, too joshcryer Feb 2014 #9
Just like DADt treestar Feb 2014 #10
why did he offer it up in the first place? frwrfpos Feb 2014 #11
Because ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #13
There was no reason to offer it up in the first place frwrfpos Feb 2014 #16
Because GOP said "we need entitlement reform before... Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #17
Thank you! ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #21
I think you are confused about the difference between understanding and agreement. Lasher Feb 2014 #31
The post an argument against it ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #64
It's there to read in this very thread. Lasher Feb 2014 #88
Okay, let's take this step by step ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #89
Yes, but that's not what we're talking about. Lasher Feb 2014 #96
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #103
That doesn't mean Obama didn't propose the cuts. He did. Lasher Feb 2014 #110
Obama should have told the repukes to fuck off frwrfpos Feb 2014 #24
Or, ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #65
+1 JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #85
Thank you. n/t whathehell Feb 2014 #105
Another point to remember. Social Security recipients vote overwhelmingly Republican. That puts okaawhatever Feb 2014 #23
Well....two thrids of Seniors voted Republican in 2012. One Third of Social Security Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #71
BINGO! ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #72
It's like when Obama offered to end payroll tax cuts in MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #12
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #14
It's brilliant! A Democrat offers up a "cut" on Social Security neverforget Feb 2014 #15
GOTV 2014 and then we win elections.....or something Autumn Feb 2014 #19
And it would be a shame ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #90
Oh, you mean telling the truth? Glitterati Feb 2014 #91
There is no truth in that ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #95
Frankly, I don't give a damn what you think Glitterati Feb 2014 #97
And he said they are still on the table, even after he took them out of his budget. Lasher Feb 2014 #100
Of course he did Glitterati Feb 2014 #101
So you are typing to yourself? ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #109
Quite frankly, I don't care how he and you justified it Glitterati Feb 2014 #115
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #122
Lather, rinse, repeat JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #126
Then President Obama should stop calling for the cuts to SS in his budget negotiations. Autumn Feb 2014 #93
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #98
I won't argue with what the White House says, the offer remains on the table in event of new talks Autumn Feb 2014 #108
I agree. Lifelong Protester Feb 2014 #119
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #20
Don't you think that standing up for Democratic programs like Social Security is neverforget Feb 2014 #22
This is where Obama has done lasting damage to the Democratic Party brand. Lasher Feb 2014 #34
This is simply ProSense Feb 2014 #41
OK Republicans hate Social Security. How does that make Obama's proposed cuts any less real? Lasher Feb 2014 #48
Yes, it ProSense Feb 2014 #51
You have no way of knowing that the media will later decide Obama is Social Security's savior. Lasher Feb 2014 #52
I think ProSense Feb 2014 #53
I've seen it already. That comes up in the search I suggested for you. Lasher Feb 2014 #55
What ProSense Feb 2014 #57
Ha ha, this is starting to get kinda funny. Lasher Feb 2014 #59
And hopefully ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #69
I called it: ProSense Feb 2014 #83
This cut or "strategy", chess if you like, is dumb beyond words. neverforget Feb 2014 #44
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #66
trust us! we'd never sell you out because we're politicians. neverforget Feb 2014 #125
Nor do I ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #127
he makes more right than wrong decisions but this neverforget Feb 2014 #129
I disagree ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #130
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #94
No one wants their Social Security cut, not even TeaPubliKlans. TheKentuckian Feb 2014 #46
No, ProSense Feb 2014 #18
Why are you changing the subject? nt okaawhatever Feb 2014 #26
"It's like when Obama offered to end payroll tax cuts in" ProSense Feb 2014 #27
You have to stop posting proof so quick, ProSense. joshcryer Feb 2014 #30
Yeah. Still, the funny thing ProSense Feb 2014 #33
It is a good thing that Obama took it out of the budget. joshcryer Feb 2014 #35
Obama said SS cuts are still on the table, even though they are not in his budget now. Lasher Feb 2014 #56
Sure, rhetoric. joshcryer Feb 2014 #62
Just remember that the payroll tax cut also damaged the long term solvency of SS. grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #40
No it didn't. It was fully paid for. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #45
Kinda. But in not gonna fight about this cuz I approve of the direction grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #121
That's incorrect. Here are the numbers ProSense Feb 2014 #123
Um, no, it was in exchange for unemployment benefits. joshcryer Feb 2014 #29
Let's not forget the elephant in the room here. SS recipients are now voting majority okaawhatever Feb 2014 #25
"SS recipients are now voting majority Republican." joshcryer Feb 2014 #32
I'd like to see that link too. Lasher Feb 2014 #36
those are all entitlement programs and not just social security. I looked for the article I read but okaawhatever Feb 2014 #38
Democrats do better in the 70s-80s though. joshcryer Feb 2014 #43
Here is the USA today results from the 2012 election. It shows Mitt won just over 55% okaawhatever Feb 2014 #47
Please find it. joshcryer Feb 2014 #54
And Obama vs. Mitt does not equal Democratic vs. Republican Lasher Feb 2014 #58
Everyone else was a rounding error in 2012 though. joshcryer Feb 2014 #63
Point being there are other offices, and that Obama in the debates said he and Mitt agreed Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #75
Yes. Gore warned people with the lockbox. joshcryer Feb 2014 #79
But 'Seniors' and 'Social Security Beneficiaries' are not the same thing. 1/3 of beneficiaries are Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #73
Don't leave out widows, either Glitterati Feb 2014 #77
Only 2/3 of Social Security beneficiaries are over 65. One thrid is under 65. Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #76
And MANY are children with a deceased parent Glitterati Feb 2014 #78
There is no one to peel, the premise is false no matter how often or stridently repeated. TheKentuckian Feb 2014 #50
You're wrong, but even if you're not..... Glitterati Feb 2014 #82
Mahalo for all the analyses, Cha Feb 2014 #28
I've often wondered if President Obama's CPI proposals might be on the sucker bait side. IrishAyes Feb 2014 #37
It was ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #111
Let's remember Obama DID CUT SOCIAL SECURITY, as I recall.... grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #39
No, Obama had nothing to do with that. Lasher Feb 2014 #60
You are correct, but what he should have been advocating was a rise in the COLA formula, Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #74
That's right. Lasher Feb 2014 #87
Thank you for stopping the trial balloon ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #112
I'm just sorry that I missed your original post MrScorpio Feb 2014 #42
Haters will continue to hate...cause, that's what jaysunb Feb 2014 #49
wow, you really are buying into that crap? Seriously? bowens43 Feb 2014 #81
Everything is B.S. ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #113
LOL, I get it, 8 dimensional chess shit again! n-t Logical Feb 2014 #135
Thank you, my friend. GOTV 2014. KnR. Hekate Feb 2014 #61
While I do feel the negatives outweight the positives.... NCTraveler Feb 2014 #67
Thank you ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #114
Considering that anything that Obama is for madokie Feb 2014 #68
The Combustible Hair Club decided a long time ago ... JoePhilly Feb 2014 #70
He didn't kill it but but but he made it fashionable to do so! (wiping froth) Eeeevil! great white snark Feb 2014 #102
yup ... as if GW Bush wasn't pushing privitization long before JoePhilly Feb 2014 #104
Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #116
bullshit. Obama has legitmized the destruction of safty nets. Anything goes now. bowens43 Feb 2014 #80
Exactly Glitterati Feb 2014 #84
Oh ProSense Feb 2014 #92
Oh bullshit back at you. great white snark Feb 2014 #99
GW Bush would have never tried to privitize Social Security JoePhilly Feb 2014 #106
I respectfully disagree -- This is how the agenda keeps getting shifted further to the right Armstead Feb 2014 #86
Never have so many words been used to be so wrong about this Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #118
No I didn't frame my peception to fit the premise....I'd rather that my premise be wrong Armstead Feb 2014 #128
The problem I see with what you're saying is it relies on Republican voters either Arcanetrance Feb 2014 #107
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #120
You advocated that Chained CPI long and hard, here is my favorite of your Pro Chained CPI posts Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #117
I think you have reading comprehension issues ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #124
It's the opposite of good policy. Orsino Feb 2014 #131
Well, glad you asked ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #132
Seems someone agrees with me ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #133
Want links of people who disagree? nt Logical Feb 2014 #136
Sure ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #137
8 dimensional chess syndrome! nt Logical Feb 2014 #139
Is that a link ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #140
No, it is a disease some here have. nt Logical Feb 2014 #141
thanks 1. I'm glad you made it an OP. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #134
Apparently ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #138
and then there are the posts about "disagreement is not the same as hating" BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There seems to be DU angs...»Reply #13