Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)

2. Renting the properties is better than allowing them to stand vacant

Reply to xchrom (Original post)

Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:43 AM

Feb 2014

The landlords will have a vested interest in maintaining the value of their investment. If the property or the neighborhood goes down the drain, they will lose substantial money. That is true regardless of who owns the property.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wall Street Is Drooling Over The Money It Will Make On Americans Who Can�t Afford Houses [View all] xchrom Feb 2014 OP

This country is wealthy enough that no citizen should EVER woo me with science Feb 2014 #1

Renting the properties is better than allowing them to stand vacant badtoworse Feb 2014 #2

What they are creating is multi family housing Glitterati Feb 2014 #3

I heard Thom Hartmann fredamae Feb 2014 #4

It's actually very simple Glitterati Feb 2014 #5

Thanks! fredamae Feb 2014 #6