Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: D.C. Insider: There's a Shadow Govt. Running the Country, and It's Not Up for Re-Election [View all]jsr
(7,712 posts)61. Sometimes people forget to look at their name tag
LOL
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
D.C. Insider: There's a Shadow Govt. Running the Country, and It's Not Up for Re-Election [View all]
xchrom
Feb 2014
OP
This is the stupidest "argument," to wit: IF there is no difference, then VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT.
WinkyDink
Feb 2014
#13
You are trying to argue with someone that has to include "progressive" in his name to
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#34
How about the screen name of: "AReallyReallyLiberalProgressiveDemocatHonest." nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#50
Social darwinism = touting "survival of the fittest" as appropriate social policy.
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#33
So what? The core idea is that the "strong" SHOULD prosper and the "weak" SHOULD not.
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#48
First, i disagree with you on what you call the "central tenant (sic) of Marxism". But for
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#70
No, actually you just said one thing = another, as though it were self-evident.
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#73
I disagree with you and am asking you to explain why you think Marxism is social darwinism.
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#78
Ideas aren't just matters of opinion. There is no theory in your discussion. Victorian thought
El_Johns
Feb 2014
#80
So your addition to the discussion here is that you think the OP is funny? Care to elaborate? nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#35
You gotta love the absolute certainty. "There is no shadow government in the USA."
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#99
So you dont know with absolute certainty that there isnt a shadow government yet
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#104
Again with the adacious absolute certainty. Just because you dont know of any evidence doesnt
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#110
It's useless to present evidence to someone in denial. Do you accept the evidence for climate
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#113
I'm just tired of all the "shadow government" crap. Same thing the right says all the time.
7962
Feb 2014
#36
Didnt say I didnt care, I said I was tired of it. I'm also tired of "obama is kenyan";
7962
Feb 2014
#49
Then why worry about Romney winning? You think they also want the POSITIVE things Obama's done?
7962
Feb 2014
#89
As tired as you may be of hearing it, the country is a million more times "tired" of it happening.
cui bono
Feb 2014
#84
It's easy to criticize. But much harder to commit. So tell us what you think about this. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#74
The shadow Government is "The Family." Been calling the shots for decades. The White House is mere
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2014
#40
Exactly because voting means you are free. The only obligation of a citizen is to vote.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#112