Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Since 1789, every U.S. President has belonged to the same privileged fraternity. [View all]rrneck
(17,671 posts)42. I'm confused
From your link:
Margaret Thatcher deserves the major share of credit for Britain's economic recovery. It is easy to forget how far the country had traveled down the socialist road--and how much damage this had caused to the British economy--before she came into office. Nationalized industries, socialized housing and medicine, burdensome government regulations, immensely powerful trade unions, irresponsible monetary policies, and enormous welfare state had brought economic progress to a virtual standstill. Layer by layer, she removed the obstacles to economic growth, despite strong opposition even within her own party. While President Reagan rightly receives great credit for slowing down the growth of government in the US, we should recognize that Margaret Thatcher's repeal of socialism in Britain represented a true revolution. We can only hope the Europe of 1992 will be modeled on Thatcher's Britain rather than on some of the bloated welfare states on the continent.
Source: In The Arena, by Richard Nixon, p. 54 Nov 30, 1978
Source: In The Arena, by Richard Nixon, p. 54 Nov 30, 1978
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher
Thatcher's economic policy was influenced by monetarist thinking and economists such as Milton Friedman and Alan Walters.[84] Together with Chancellor of the Exchequer Geoffrey Howe, she lowered direct taxes on income and increased indirect taxes.[85] She increased interest rates to slow the growth of the money supply and thereby lower inflation,[84] introduced cash limits on public spending, and reduced expenditure on social services such as education and housing.[85] Her cuts in higher education spending resulted in her being the first Oxford-educated post-war Prime Minister not to be awarded an honorary doctorate by the University of Oxford, after a 738 to 319 vote of the governing assembly and a student petition.[86] Her new centrally funded City Technology Colleges did not enjoy much success, and the Funding Agency for Schools was set up to control expenditure by opening and closing schools; the Social Market Foundation, a centre-left think tank, described it as having "an extraordinary range of dictatorial powers".[87]
Thatcher's economic policy was influenced by monetarist thinking and economists such as Milton Friedman and Alan Walters.[84] Together with Chancellor of the Exchequer Geoffrey Howe, she lowered direct taxes on income and increased indirect taxes.[85] She increased interest rates to slow the growth of the money supply and thereby lower inflation,[84] introduced cash limits on public spending, and reduced expenditure on social services such as education and housing.[85] Her cuts in higher education spending resulted in her being the first Oxford-educated post-war Prime Minister not to be awarded an honorary doctorate by the University of Oxford, after a 738 to 319 vote of the governing assembly and a student petition.[86] Her new centrally funded City Technology Colleges did not enjoy much success, and the Funding Agency for Schools was set up to control expenditure by opening and closing schools; the Social Market Foundation, a centre-left think tank, described it as having "an extraordinary range of dictatorial powers".[87]
You seem to be saying that Hillary Clinton's and Margret Thatcher's political positions are the same. Do you think that's so?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
212 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since 1789, every U.S. President has belonged to the same privileged fraternity. [View all]
pnwmom
Feb 2014
OP
The gender of the presidency has . .. all to do with that individual's own insecurities???
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#2
I thought this was going to be about them all being in 'skull and bones' or something.....
Captain Stern
Feb 2014
#3
So the cause of sexism in this country is due to the fact that there hasn't been a female president?
Vashta Nerada
Feb 2014
#41
because she runs AGAINST womens issues! DUH....have you not heard of institutionalized
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#140
If Sarah Palin were to switch parties and run for the Democratic nomination,
Common Sense Party
Feb 2014
#178
No, because she's an idiot who can't string a simple declarative sentence together.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#189
Of course. But I refuse to believe that there has never in US history been a fully qualified
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#209
And black men got the vote well before any women. So I guess it's not that surprising.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#211
That was a single candidate. No other woman has ever been considered a serious candidate
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#152
sure by pointing out sexism and racism is calling the perpetrator "unhuman"
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#161
I am not talking about that ending it.....I am talking about the end of feeling
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#207
So 7 out of 39 grew up lower middle class or below -- and 0 grew up female. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#195
So when Hillary is elected, than you will feel more comfortable about the SI swimsuit issue?
davidn3600
Feb 2014
#8
As far as political office goes, the US does not promote female leadership well at all.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#13
If women were in the streets like people are in Kiev, I'd think it appropriate.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#16
well we are really not marketting the message well if we have so many liberal men on DU
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#30
You haven't shown you deserve any....I don't respect those that disrespect women....
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#206
I doubt simply adding more women in government would change how women are viewed by society
davidn3600
Feb 2014
#19
The large uptick in rape is the result of a redefinition of what constitutes rape in Sweden.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#20
I'm going to sit back and let you point out where I suggested we'd turn into a utopia.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#24
Ah. It's just that the charts you show for Thacher and Clinton are identical. nt
rrneck
Feb 2014
#45
Uh you should really check the link before you make erroneous statements...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#100
There has been a backlash of racism against President Obama since he was elected.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#26
NO "plenty" didnt...that is a damn lie...ALSO many were proven to have NOT been given
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#57
So...She is qualified because she couldn't see the lies many of us could
The Straight Story
Feb 2014
#105
I remember when saying "they had the same Intel" was a line just for rightwing loons...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#80
Oh you take that as LITERALLY no one...even there was even one I was supposed to say so...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#125
Right because why would we want to back a Populist Liberal? God Forbid!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#169
but if you read my previous post....how she voted belies your stance...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#175
Unlucky for you....NO one has EVER had this much support this far out...ever recorded
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#200
So you turn your nose up at a B+? Sorry....near as you can get TO an A!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#182
Talk about beside the point. Check your reading comprehension. It could use some work.nt
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#59
No, the OP has nothing to do with Hillary per se. It has to do with the context
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#144
"Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2014
#118
Perhaps the real problem is that too few people have too much power.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2014
#120
All gender being equal, they have all been quite wealthy--and only grown more so through the office.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#89
The first paragraph provides the context for the second. It should be too hard to understand. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#115
As a woman, I very much appreciate the point, But Gender alone isn't the issue for me anymore.
2banon
Feb 2014
#131
This isn't about who we should pick for President. It's about why T & A photos are offensive
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#145
The fact is that we live in a country that has never elected a woman President and in many ways
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#147
Of course she, whoever she is, will be as flawed as anyone else. But she will also
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#193