+1 (Reply #218) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]

Response to BainsBane (Reply #56)

Sun Feb 23, 2014, 04:58 AM

JustAnotherGen (27,259 posts)

218. +1

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

436 replies	Author	Time	Post
This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]	Flying Squirrel	Feb 2014	OP
You are mistaken	1000words	Feb 2014	#1
No you are	dsc	Feb 2014	#7
So objectification is okay, sometimes?	1000words	Feb 2014	#8
I think the SI thread would have been fine in the lounge	dsc	Feb 2014	#9
What's the difference?	1000words	Feb 2014	#10
That's my understanding as well. Any reaction other than utter contempt for objectification was met	Jetboy	Feb 2014	#13
The difference is that people don't go into the lounge expecting progressive political discussions.	pnwmom	Feb 2014	#14
We are discussing the issue of objectification	1000words	Feb 2014	#17
I understand that; which is why I don't think T & A photos belong in G.D.	pnwmom	Feb 2014	#42
It always amazes me when people think GD is -meaner-	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#65
The meanest place is where a woman got called a dog without repurcussions.	Jetboy	Feb 2014	#249
Frankly I'm not sure I come to DU expecting that these days...	Scootaloo	Feb 2014	#64
Most of the time the Lounge is far more 'progressive' than GD.	GoneOffShore	Feb 2014	#193
No it wasn't	dsc	Feb 2014	#16
So the author of the OP is indeed mistaken	1000words	Feb 2014	#20
Huh?	dsc	Feb 2014	#23
You seem to be hung up on the idea ...	1000words	Feb 2014	#32
we are not engaging in it	dsc	Feb 2014	#36
So when I say that a woman has a nice ass, neither am I.	1000words	Feb 2014	#41
It is objectification	dsc	Feb 2014	#44
I can live with that	1000words	Feb 2014	#52
hey,	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#78
THIS /\ right here	Vanje	Mar 2014	#435
It. is also wholly inappropriate in the LGBT forum	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#48
thank you for sharing that ... some great insight in that post. Thank you. Brave post.	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#80
It was an extremely unpleasant two weeks,	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#195
again I am so sorry my dad died at an inconvenient time for you	dsc	Feb 2014	#237
Your assertion that a similar recent thread was perfectly acceptable	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#277
You have every right tonot like the decision that I and the other hosts made in regards to beefcake	dsc	Feb 2014	#332
The hosts who were active	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#341
I am going to say one and only one thing about your post	dsc	Feb 2014	#103
thank you for this. transparency ... while I think MsToad has/had a point. I hope this can all be	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#115
thanks it wasn't a pleasant time	dsc	Feb 2014	#122
I understand -	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#124
Here is the exchange, so people can judge for themselves	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#186
What? You get to decide my gender now?	Jamastiene	Feb 2014	#214
I was very explicit about what troubled me	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#298
Thanks Jamastiene.	Puglover	Feb 2014	#360
I am also an LBGT host , and a lesbian	Vanje	Mar 2014	#436
I am sorry my dad died at a time inconvenient for you	dsc	Feb 2014	#234
What I said was	Ms. Toad	Feb 2014	#318
We aren't mind readers.	plantwomyn	Feb 2014	#306
Very very well said	JustAnotherGen	Feb 2014	#2
In my opinion	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#3
Excellent post. eom.	In_The_Wind	Feb 2014	#6
I was surprised that the women here did not support the models, other women	Cleita	Feb 2014	#12
weren't you leaving DU?	Kali	Feb 2014	#51
oh Kali, you are crackin' me up ...	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#84
feel like I musta missed something	Kali	Feb 2014	#88
I am dear as soon as I set up a blog where I can really say what I think of you	Cleita	Feb 2014	#197
This message was self-deleted by its author	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#213
Cleita...	MrMickeysMom	Feb 2014	#262
That's sweet of you and you are right of course.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#266
If you really want to help, get involved in political campaigns...	ConservativeDemocrat	Feb 2014	#281
Thanks. I have done that in the past, but I'm slowing down and too old for the leg	Cleita	Feb 2014	#282
Excellent advice. nt	SunSeeker	Feb 2014	#284
That strawman is getting larger by the minute	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#56
+a million. nt	laundry_queen	Feb 2014	#212
+1	JustAnotherGen	Feb 2014	#218
NO one is NOT supporting them...its about having a fair playing field on DU...	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#196
Instead we got drooling and chortling. n/t	pnwmom	Feb 2014	#15
"Don't want to see T&A? Trash it or ignore it. "	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#19
Honest Abe has some advice for the prudes you describe:	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#148
You should adhere to it. nt	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#215
You should have taken it	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#223
This message was self-deleted by its author	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#225
What part of Abe's comment didn't you understand?	Squinch	Feb 2014	#236
If you read it correctly	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#243
If you read Abe correctly,	Squinch	Feb 2014	#244
Well clearly we're both illiterate.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#270
Post removed	Post removed	Feb 2014	#322
Woah there	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#326
I can only imagine the ethical and mental convenience given to those who conflate civility and prudi	LanternWaste	Feb 2014	#368
You should try it some time.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#373
"And what is more liberal than freedom?" - Cheesy, meaningless bullshit.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#22
Shit even O'Reilly would't say	Scootaloo	Feb 2014	#73
Normally it's called framing	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#145
Every Joe Blow libertarian waxes poetic about the primacy of "freedom."	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#154
Already took those classes	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#158
Well then I'd certainly ask for my money back if I were you.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#161
...	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#163
Laughter truly is the best medicine. I hope you feel better.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#171
I do.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#172
In a truly gender equal society, the SI cover wouldn't exist	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#46
I was in JC Penney this evening with my SO and we walked by the women lingerie department.	RC	Feb 2014	#149
Give it a rest	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#210
The original SISI thread was never locked.	pintobean	Feb 2014	#222
Then why you'd post that?	RC	Feb 2014	#228
If you want T&A, build your own website.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#216
more offensive than the actual post is the typical attacks	BlancheSplanchnik	Feb 2014	#273
"jerk-off material"?	pintobean	Feb 2014	#274
Yep	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#301
I know	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#275
well....the "HoF crowd's" postings strike me more as the logical result	BlancheSplanchnik	Feb 2014	#276
It also looks to my amateur judgement	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#302
you're being cryptic, and I dont get it.	BlancheSplanchnik	Feb 2014	#307
Read post 301. nt	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#308
im on mobile. ..can't see numbers.	BlancheSplanchnik	Feb 2014	#311
The unintended and sometimes negative consequences of that same freedom...	LanternWaste	Feb 2014	#366
so you don't care about hostile environments? Gotcha!	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#370
If the SI cover, which is out in the supermarkets in full view, were in fact naked women showing	Cleita	Feb 2014	#4
Apparently you live in a beachside community but	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#98
Really, this is serious?	Cleita	Feb 2014	#143
Please read my question again if you will	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#150
I just saw it the other day.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#151
Spontaneously topless in a public space	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#156
I'd say more coed.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#157
I do not understand this response.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#160
They were more college aged.	CFLDem	Feb 2014	#169
It's known as a fashion photo shoot. Pick up any Style, Marie Claire or Vogue and you will see	Cleita	Feb 2014	#153
You are still not answering my question -	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#159
Well, beach is where those photo shoots are done. What is wrong with topless anyway	Cleita	Feb 2014	#162
No I do not hate women. And yes, I know that women go topless in many places.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#166
So are you spontaneous at your job? You do know that a fashion shoot is a job, not just for	Cleita	Feb 2014	#170
Please remember that the question I posed to you was	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#181
I can't continue this ridiculous line of questioning. It's a magazine.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#185
But it's just the same and only question I've been asking all along	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#188
It's a stupid question only a stupid person would answer.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#191
Why is the question stupid?	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#198
Go see a priest. Confess your sins. You will be absolved of all those sinful	Cleita	Feb 2014	#200
Why will you not answer this simple question?	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#202
Because I'm a free person and don't have to answer any questions. Your	Cleita	Feb 2014	#203
But I am not ordering you, I am asking you.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#204
And I'm telling you to piss off. Yet, you persist.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#205
Okay. Good night then.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#206
Why are you asking a question you seem to already know the answer to?	AlbertCat	Feb 2014	#296
I asked the question of a woman who lives in a beach	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#299
What does spontaneity have to do with it?	Common Sense Party	Feb 2014	#381
I'm glad you asked -	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#389
I highly doubt that they do. I hate the beach, personally.	Common Sense Party	Feb 2014	#390
My point is probably to much to explain	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#391
I think women are objectified in the media in both spontaneous and	Common Sense Party	Feb 2014	#392
Ok.....	The Straight Story	Feb 2014	#207
uh no the SI SSE is not a "fashion shoot", that is just bullshit.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#253
That's true so if women are buying all the bikinis, guess who they are marketing to. n/t	Cleita	Feb 2014	#255
your argument is circular.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#257
Really? I guess I must tell my professional athlete women friends from the gym	Cleita	Feb 2014	#267
77% male readers.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#272
I see stuff like this on a weekly basis	Soundman	Feb 2014	#278
You know, what I don't understand is why	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#280
I see your point and I can say	Soundman	Feb 2014	#287
Thank you for your response. But therein lies the difference -	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#289
If you ever figure it out let me know.	Soundman	Feb 2014	#294
No, they don't.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#288
And your experience is that they don't. Mine too.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#290
But remember	rrneck	Feb 2014	#292
I'm clear on that.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#293
The SI cover WAS posted by a woman	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#5
As were most of the threads perpetuating the gender wars	Major Nikon	Feb 2014	#27
As is this one perpetuating it too?	zeemike	Feb 2014	#107
That doesn't even pass the laugh test	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#382
Is Riff not a member of your group? n/t	seaglass	Feb 2014	#31
We don't have "members".	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#35
Yeah she does post in your group - mostly in the Hot celebrity thread which I see is not one	seaglass	Feb 2014	#38
Indeed I do not post in that thread. Thank you for noticing.	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#47
Well I appreciate that. n/t	seaglass	Feb 2014	#53
Oh give me a break	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#383
Well, you finally changed that claim	pintobean	Feb 2014	#387
There's two groups of people trolling each other in GD	TransitJohn	Feb 2014	#11
177 people have said they see those threads as part of a hostile environment	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#63
Can't look beyond HoF.	RC	Feb 2014	#164
It is so obvious that opinon on this site is entirely against your views on this issue	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#211
Then put me on "Ignore"	RC	Feb 2014	#233
You are objecting to not being allowed to objectify women in the General Discussion...	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#369
Who is objectifying women?	RC	Feb 2014	#371
it is not ABOUT those women...it is ABOUT how those pictures were	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#372
In the where??	polly7	Feb 2014	#375
YOU know where.....I am not interested in those threads..they sound disgusting to me	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#376
No, 'I' don't know where.	polly7	Feb 2014	#378
I saw the rules to those threads posted....I am NOT going there...	VanillaRhapsody	Feb 2014	#379
LOL	polly7	Feb 2014	#380
I'm not HoF but I'm 100% on their side on this.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#217
And I am not a MRA type.	RC	Feb 2014	#239
I didn't say you were...	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#241
Other people read these threads too.	RC	Feb 2014	#245
Many men (like me) on DU disagree with that assessment.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#246
You don't recognize bullying when you see it?	RC	Feb 2014	#247
I do. I just think that you're the bully, not the object of your vendetta.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#248
I'm a bully for objecting to bullying?	RC	Feb 2014	#250
I have no doubt in my mind that you believe that you are right.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#251
And as do you.	RC	Feb 2014	#252
Since this subthread was in response to one of my posts	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#384
The bully-as-victim schtick... A favorite of all high-schoolers.	Democracyinkind	Feb 2014	#385
Thanks. I appreciate the support. nt	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#386
Holy crap	Bobbie Jo	Feb 2014	#303
But you have to admire the perfect consistency.	Squinch	Feb 2014	#327
Absolute truth. nt	UtahLib	Feb 2014	#343
Isn't that the truth! n/t	demmiblue	Feb 2014	#346
While I think both HoF and the Men's Group have been unfairly characterized at times	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#398
I disagree with that, completely! nt.	polly7	Feb 2014	#431
Yet you condemn those who fail to toe your own "line."	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#397
As I said, I have a problem with the almost constant bullying by	RC	Feb 2014	#429
And There Are No MRA here	libodem	Feb 2014	#283
It bothers me to see that claim being made,	polly7	Feb 2014	#286
Thank you	libodem	Feb 2014	#336
You know, we may seem to be on slightly opposite sides at times, but I have no problem	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#399
I don't understand how my post could in any way be controversial or problematic,	polly7	Feb 2014	#400
It isn't, to me. But you know how people around here - on all sides - will twist others' words	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#402
Oh, I know certain people who do that ALL the time.	polly7	Feb 2014	#404
I basically agree with that assessment. Though it may be as much a general human tendency to	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#406
You can usually tell pretty easily when it's oversimplification or not understanding ...	polly7	Feb 2014	#407
I agree that the caricaturing and name-calling frequently gets out of hand around here.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#409
right. Just people uttering standard MRA talking points.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#313
Haven't seen it	libodem	Feb 2014	#337
Post removed	Post removed	Feb 2014	#350
.	pintobean	Feb 2014	#352
This message was self-deleted by its author	uppityperson	Feb 2014	#364
some people think they are being fair	hfojvt	Feb 2014	#96
false equivalency argument.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#254
Not really.	TransitJohn	Feb 2014	#258
Is it really worth 5 threads a day on this?	pacalo	Feb 2014	#18
Cool. You're angry for call outs. And your solution for this is to do exactly what you despise.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#25
"And your solution for this is to do exactly what you despise."	pacalo	Feb 2014	#28
Does blocking a problem from your consciousness involve talking about it a lot?	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#29
I used the keyword auto-trash function last night.	pacalo	Feb 2014	#50
Thank	MannyGoldstein	Feb 2014	#39
That means a lot...	pacalo	Feb 2014	#54
Shucks...	MannyGoldstein	Feb 2014	#108
totally agree...	DontTreadOnMe	Feb 2014	#260
^^That.	Orrex	Feb 2014	#114
I am awful because I think it is funny	Bok_Tukalo	Feb 2014	#21
There's intolerance and rude behavior on both sides in the gender wars on DU	mokawanis	Feb 2014	#24
I rec'd the OP, but I agree with this as well.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#401
Beautifully written post, whooshing like a jet over the heads of many here.	Squinch	Feb 2014	#26
But it is mistaken from the beginning. The SI cover OP was started by a woman. nt	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#30
...	Kali	Feb 2014	#45
I'll stoop beating that horse when I feel that fact has been recognized.	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#49
who cares who posted it?	Kali	Feb 2014	#57
^^Exactly, right, Kali^^	hlthe2b	Feb 2014	#60
It's funny. The SOP of GD doesn't say that.	Vashta Nerada	Feb 2014	#110
What is so important about your presumed right to post Kate Upton pics in GD?	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#403
I am totally stealing that gif. nt	rrneck	Feb 2014	#66
well	Kali	Feb 2014	#74
...	Whisp	Feb 2014	#61
Oh?	The Straight Story	Feb 2014	#33
When you pull it out like that,	JAbuchan08	Feb 2014	#295
If one sees any of the opinions expressed on here as "extremely controlling and	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#405
Thanks?	JAbuchan08	Mar 2014	#434
You sound like a mature and grown up man	Whisp	Feb 2014	#34
It just is funny that you don't see belittling men at every opportunity as analogous	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#37
but, do you ever call women - girls ... ?	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#102
From the POV of goading, stabbing at and pricking people, it is the same.	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#116
honestly ,,, and I hate the term War but, truly ---	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#121
I totally agree. And that is the funny thing.	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#130
I agree that there's been over-the-top rhetoric all around. And my own frustration with things	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#410
"When I read posts like JTFrog's I am reminded what is truly at stake here."	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#408
+1	freshwest	Feb 2014	#433
And so to end the Gender wars you call out only the men and tell "men" they must change...	Drew Richards	Feb 2014	#40
What exactly is a "rad fem"?	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#55
"Rad" is short for "radical".	pacalo	Feb 2014	#59
Well, I am glad you set me straight "its use is most appropriate here in this discussion"	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#62
Glad you asked.	pacalo	Feb 2014	#76
I especailly like your point about words that are used in everyday language	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#86
You've brought up another big turn-off for me.	pacalo	Feb 2014	#91
Turning you on is not something I would have any interest in	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#94
"Their feminity (sic) is not one of them."	pacalo	Feb 2014	#97
It is someone who holds the radical notion	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#69
There doesn't seem to be anything radical in that	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#87
I don't think DU'ers literally believe that women aren't people. But their worldview is myopic and	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#412
Radical Feminist	rrneck	Feb 2014	#70
So, it is not intended as an insult?	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#75
I don't think so.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#82
Its usage reminds me of an appellation applied to another group of people	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#99
Yep. Context is important.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#104
If you read the post I was initially responding to	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#109
that would depend on context	Kali	Feb 2014	#89
The post and poster I asked the question of ...	etherealtruth	Feb 2014	#111
Depends on whose moth it comes out of, just like the term "feminist."	yewberry	Feb 2014	#119
177 recs	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#67
Kinda curious	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#72
And here is a perfect example of what I am talking about...a direct personal attack on my character	Drew Richards	Feb 2014	#396
10 DUers? You need to recount. I have seen hundreds of posters come out against these images.	Squinch	Feb 2014	#120
That is NOT what he said. Not at all.	RC	Feb 2014	#178
THIS! +1000%	RC	Feb 2014	#176
+++++	Cleita	Feb 2014	#279
Are they really attacking all men? Or only those men who belittle women seeking social justice	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#411
What about some of us women who've also been hurt very badly,	polly7	Feb 2014	#416
I agree that you and others have been treated unfairly. I'm not perfectly objective	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#418
You're a good person, and there's certainly nothing wrong with being a dreamer!	polly7	Feb 2014	#423
Thanks! You too!	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#425
Impressive, Flying Squirrel... Eloquent	hlthe2b	Feb 2014	#43
Thanks, Flying Squirrel	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#58
Shaming tactics never works	Harmony Blue	Feb 2014	#68
Another example of incorrectly framing a position with which you disagree.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#77
The poster who disagrees with you is either a dolt or a troll?	Comrade Grumpy	Feb 2014	#117
Again, another post incorrectly framing an opposing argument.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#118
It's a pretty accurate framing, in fact	Orrex	Feb 2014	#126
I am correct in this instance. Incorrectly framing feminist arguments on DU is a beloved pastime.	Gravitycollapse	Feb 2014	#132
Interesting response.	Orrex	Feb 2014	#155
You mean the shaming tactics you used against	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#79
sure it does	Kali	Feb 2014	#90
Why not? It's worked for years wid gunz, right?	Eleanors38	Feb 2014	#113
If the default is still "human" = "male" then I don't see how "humanism" is some great marker	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#413
If objectification is an issue, then discussions about it belong in GD.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#71
It seems DU members are to "admit" to objectification and/or "privilege"	Eleanors38	Feb 2014	#92
Yeah. I think it goes back to	rrneck	Feb 2014	#100
Comfort food or warm place to shit.	Eleanors38	Feb 2014	#106
Wow, I haven't heard that phrase since Earl Butz.	Tanuki	Feb 2014	#123
It's a metaphor or off-color joke; Butz picked his embellished version...	Eleanors38	Feb 2014	#152
Unfortunately we don't usually get to the why of it.	yewberry	Feb 2014	#128
Well, in the interest of transparency...	rrneck	Feb 2014	#134
"No meaningful legislation possible" is probably correct, in this instance.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#414
The real question is why is it an issue and what are we to do about it?	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#129
Yep.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#135
However,	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#137
I don't understand the term "intersection"	rrneck	Feb 2014	#139
I am referring to how there is a cross section	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#140
I hear you.	rrneck	Feb 2014	#144
K&R nt	redqueen	Feb 2014	#81
Simple common courtesy goes a long way	LostOne4Ever	Feb 2014	#83
+100	RC	Feb 2014	#182
Bringing up this topic...	liberalmuse	Feb 2014	#85
Well said.	Squinch	Feb 2014	#125
I wouldn't assume someone is f'd up on gender issues	RainDog	Feb 2014	#133
I think the Hosts should be held responsible for that behavior in their forum....	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#146
It's curious	RainDog	Feb 2014	#165
It's worth noting that one of the -few- hides I've had, was for speculating that someone wasn't what	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#175
well...	RainDog	Feb 2014	#179
I'm actually a carefully constructed AI algorithm, sort of a research project at Caltech	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#180
math makes me cry	RainDog	Feb 2014	#184
Sure, you laugh, but the only thing standing between me and total world domination	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#187
I'm afraid I'll be sent to rock school	RainDog	Feb 2014	#192
Great tune! Not a huge YLT fan but I love that one...	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#415
You get a green arrow!	RainDog	Feb 2014	#417
"Julie Christie, the rumors are true..."	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#420
You Pinky or Brain?	1000words	Feb 2014	#201
Just don't put it in GD, for heaven's sake!	Comrade Grumpy	Feb 2014	#190
LOL	RainDog	Feb 2014	#194
I've been amazed at the on and offsite speculation regarding	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#221
You can alert on any post anywhere.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#315
^^Thread win.	Orrex	Feb 2014	#183
Manny's thread was making fun of this rural, conservative mindset	RainDog	Feb 2014	#199
bs. just bs. that is all. and thanks for the link so people can read it for themselves and	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#219
The jury understood this post attacking me again.	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#224
Riff. I have no jury blacklist.	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#227
You should.	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#264
What a steaming pile of bullshit. nt.	polly7	Feb 2014	#229
TA, I got your analogy right away, and I think that your words were twisted for dramatic effect	R B Garr	Feb 2014	#269
I'd like to hear an explanation of this 'analogy' that equates a woman with a dog...	Violet_Crumble	Feb 2014	#355
Oh, please. Nice try.	R B Garr	Feb 2014	#361
So pointing out that a post is sexist is 'sanctimonious crap'? Uh oh-kay...	Violet_Crumble	Feb 2014	#374
Actually I did appreciate that you explained where you were coming from in relation	R B Garr	Feb 2014	#377
Now one question for you: what is meant by the implication someone is a man-hater?	R B Garr	Feb 2014	#388
Yes, you do have it wrong RainDog - it did not start with someone comparing Riff's behavior	seaglass	Feb 2014	#220
If you're going to spew sexist crap, at least be brave enough to own it.	polly7	Feb 2014	#231
I have no idea what you are talking about. n/t	seaglass	Feb 2014	#235
thank you for giving me the benefit of the doubt	RainDog	Feb 2014	#285
So because someone called someone a name three months ago, that is why multiple	Squinch	Feb 2014	#230
It seems HOF owns the board with your powers. Who knew?	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#319
And one post calling someone a name 3 months ago will reverberate through the ages...	Squinch	Feb 2014	#320
I don't think it's necessary on either side	RainDog	Feb 2014	#331
This is a fair assessment.	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#238
"...objectification theory itself is based upon shame-based views of the human body."	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#424
I was merely responding to what was said	RainDog	Feb 2014	#426
People are so often their own worst enemies. Getting bogged down in personal beefs	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#427
Yeah.	RainDog	Feb 2014	#428
Show me a thread in GD where men were lusting over women.	Vashta Nerada	Feb 2014	#93
I was wondering where that thread was too.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#259
They simply don't exist.	Vashta Nerada	Feb 2014	#271
Well said!	greatlaurel	Feb 2014	#95
That is some of the worst (best) bait trolling I've seen!	AAO	Feb 2014	#101
I have no interest in scoring points against either gender of human being.	another_liberal	Feb 2014	#105
As expected the Flying Squirrel is right!	DeSwiss	Feb 2014	#112
Direct All Insults at ME!!!!!	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#127
Heh ...	1000words	Feb 2014	#131
Not me. You can probably whip my ass. nt	rrneck	Feb 2014	#138
Not now.	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#147
Surely, after being behooved repeatedly in such a fashion, now you have repented.	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#141
And I've got just the church for Riff to repent at...	Violet_Crumble	Feb 2014	#167
A $12 "Fornicator" value-T?	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#168
Noooooo ......	polly7	Feb 2014	#174
"Sexy Christian love offerings" just creeped me out	1000words	Feb 2014	#177
"Sexy Christian love offerings"? That phrase is about 10 billion kinds of wrong...	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#419
Thanks, and I love their gift shop!	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#240
Miss Togar will teach you a lesson!	edbermac	Feb 2014	#142
Oh, she's tried.	RiffRandell	Feb 2014	#226
Ah, that reminds me . . .	Le Taz Hot	Feb 2014	#189
Apparently the spooky IlluMANati ordered you to post it.	Warren DeMontague	Feb 2014	#351
Clear up my confusion.	Union Scribe	Feb 2014	#136
But, we have to allow the perpetually outraged among us to have something to focus on.....	kiawah	Feb 2014	#173
I think that the swimsuit photo arguments are only an outward manifestation of a deeper issue.	lumberjack_jeff	Feb 2014	#208
women revert to traditional roles b/c the pay gap is so wide, usually	RainDog	Feb 2014	#209
I think age of marriage plays into it	JustAnotherGen	Feb 2014	#242
More men are in STEM careers, etc. too	RainDog	Feb 2014	#312
Too me these are the real feminist issues, not some model's bare fanny.	Cleita	Feb 2014	#261
That may be part of it	lumberjack_jeff	Feb 2014	#268
I think you have a social condition of work expectation	RainDog	Feb 2014	#297
It's not all social conditioning.	lumberjack_jeff	Feb 2014	#304
We don't disagree on those calculations	RainDog	Feb 2014	#310
and my experience is the opposite- because of maternity leave- the bread winning Moms I have known	bettyellen	Feb 2014	#344
I can certainly agree that vasectomies should be free to all.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#422
I know we've had our disagreements, but this is a good post.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#421
Trash Thread	Feral Child	Feb 2014	#232
One only needs to take a look at who is actually getting posts hidden.	redgreenandblue	Feb 2014	#256
Very true.	Squinch	Feb 2014	#324
Lets look at my day here yesterday shall we?	Bennyboy	Feb 2014	#263
After having a thread locked by EarlG	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#291
Well thanks for being honest -	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#300
So he admits to having a need to piss on DU women.	DLevine	Feb 2014	#305
and complains that they don't like being pissed on	BainsBane	Feb 2014	#314
I'm only surprised that he said so straight up.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#328
A DU jury thought his post was just fine. 3-3 to leave.	DLevine	Feb 2014	#334
May I join you at the vomitorium?	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#338
Right after they piss on me Yes I do, I am full of fucking venom	Bennyboy	Feb 2014	#348
What a bizarre thought process.	Bobbie Jo	Feb 2014	#362
I've long suspected most of our anti-woman posters are mad because they're not getting laid.	LeftyMom	Feb 2014	#316
+1	treestar	Feb 2014	#363
OMG, Benny. If you seriously didn't understand that post was flamebait, you need	Squinch	Feb 2014	#317
I get the first part, where you made up a ridiculous story about being the innocent victim.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#323
This one part here is even more telling	boston bean	Feb 2014	#325
Well, yeah, then there's that too.	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#329
No woman gonna tell him what to do.	boston bean	Feb 2014	#330
...	RBStevens	Feb 2014	#333
Of course not. But she has just as much right to an opinion as he does.	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#393
Now you see this is where you are so wrong it is not funny	Bennyboy	Feb 2014	#349
I don't think I got it wrong at all. Here is the stuff you say	boston bean	Feb 2014	#356
"some of my best friends are women/gay/black."	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#357
And even if true, that doesn't relieve anyone of the responsibility to not be an asshole...	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#394
yes, that line was most telling for me as well. I was just going to copy and paste that sentence	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#359
"I really want to spit in the face of some posters here" Wow just wow!	hrmjustin	Feb 2014	#335
The level of hostility is completely unreasonable. WTF is this guy's problem?	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#395
He is gone now.	hrmjustin	Feb 2014	#430
Good! Screw him for giving Deadheads a bad name!	nomorenomore08	Feb 2014	#432
You "would really like to spit in the face of a couple of posters here" and "feel the need to piss	bettyellen	Feb 2014	#339
Tell us really who you'd like to spit in the face of.	idendoit	Feb 2014	#340
um	Kali	Feb 2014	#342
Y'know,	rrneck	Feb 2014	#345
He just got locked out of the thread.	pintobean	Feb 2014	#353
I dunno if he's gonna make it. nt	rrneck	Feb 2014	#354
wow -- what a load of crap	fishwax	Feb 2014	#347
Poster had been banned.	hrmjustin	Feb 2014	#365
Wow ...	1StrongBlackMan	Feb 2014	#265
100th Rec. Think I'll skip the rest of the thread. nt	Hekate	Feb 2014	#309
Not me.	AtheistCrusader	Feb 2014	#321
So do you have the capability to follow through with the threat?	snooper2	Feb 2014	#358
the word	Tuesday Afternoon	Feb 2014	#367

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.