Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)

1. At a macro level, this was a good thing

Reply to Better Believe It (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 09:56 AM

Mar 2012

Gov was requiring expensive actions be taken without any form of independent judicial review or prior notice. Whether or not there are wetlands there was not the issue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court, Led By Judge Scalia, Unanimously Allows Idaho Couple To Fight EPA [View all] Better Believe It Mar 2012 OP

At a macro level, this was a good thing ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #1

This just means they are entitled to judicial review, it doesn't mean they'll win. Lil Missy Mar 2012 #2

Our constitutional system requires Yo_Mama Mar 2012 #3

Good decision. Let them have their day in court. Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #4