Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
66. or lawfully detained
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 04:48 PM
Feb 2014

see warrior1's post #7 up thread.

She did three things wrong... she crossed the street on a red light, ignored police when they called out for her to stop, and refused to identify herself. Seeing as she WAS arrested (the photo shows her sitting on the sidewalk in handcuffs) we don't know if she refused before or after she was arrested... and seeing as she did nothing but scream the whole time both before and after her arrest I'm not seeing how at any time she gave them her verbal identification which is why she was charged with "failure to identify" and crossing at an intersection against the light.

http://www.dailytexanonline.com/news/2014/02/20/woman-arrested-on-24th-street-after-crossing-intersection
Updated (6:45 p.m. Friday): At a press conference held Friday, APD police chief Art Acevedo addressed the recent arrest of 24-year-old Amanda Jo Stephen, who was taken into custody Thursday after crossing an intersection at a red light. Stephen was formally charged with "failure to identify" and "failure to obey a pedestrian control device" and was released from Travis County Central Booking Thursday evening.

What she was doing was dangerous, and if she claims that she didn't hear the police shout to her to stop because of her earphones than she was doubly creating a hazard to herself and others... if she couldn't hear them shout at her to stop then she wouldn't have been able to hear a car or bike coming up on her unable to stop either.

They had to drag her stupid ass because she refused to get up and walk and also refused to listen to why she was detained screaming she did nothing wrong except that she did a number of things wrong and was completely uncooperative.

She brought this on herself and acted like an idiot on top of it all.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bad Cop, No Donut nt MrScorpio Feb 2014 #1
I haven't seen the video but this headline is really stretching things. Wilms Feb 2014 #2
why did he apologize? warrior1 Feb 2014 #3
Why did he bring it up? Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #57
Austin's police chief apologizes for bizarre defense of officers who arrested jaywalker uppityperson Feb 2014 #59
Actually, there have been a number of recent cases of Texas police sexually assaulting women. pnwmom Feb 2014 #64
Did ya watch the video? JJChambers Feb 2014 #4
she doesn't have to show an id warrior1 Feb 2014 #5
In Texas she has to identify herself JJChambers Feb 2014 #6
found this in the other thread warrior1 Feb 2014 #7
So... JJChambers Feb 2014 #8
To bring this back to the op warrior1 Feb 2014 #9
" who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information". ONLY if lawfully arrested uppityperson Feb 2014 #17
or lawfully detained TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #66
To quote that, again, ONLY has to ID if arrested. If detained AND gives a false ID, is illegal but uppityperson Feb 2014 #71
no, that's not at all what I said TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #78
Being accosted, handcuffed, shoved down by 4 big cops for jaywalking may have caused the "hysteria" uppityperson Feb 2014 #80
I already showed you what she was arrested for TorchTheWitch Feb 2014 #81
She did NOT need to ID herself until AFTER she was arrested. Arrested for jaywalking. uppityperson Feb 2014 #86
I am a hazard because I am deaf. Thank you so much for making that point. I will never go out again uppityperson Feb 2014 #72
No, she only has to identify herself after she was arrested. jeff47 Feb 2014 #30
That's nonsense and you know it JJChambers Feb 2014 #51
Being pulled over for speeding is a completely different story... Ohio Joe Feb 2014 #56
Tx law says different for people on foot as she was uppityperson Feb 2014 #58
Driving has laws requiring you show your license on demand. jeff47 Feb 2014 #68
Being arrested for jaywalking is ridiculous enough as it is. kcr Feb 2014 #10
No it isn't .. She should have taken her ticket like everyone else JJChambers Feb 2014 #11
Nope. kcr Feb 2014 #12
TIL JJChambers Feb 2014 #13
I'm not sure what you mean by that kcr Feb 2014 #14
And the influx continues... woo me with science Feb 2014 #18
Yes, their newest champion has arrived. Rex Feb 2014 #46
Exactly: my thoughts about authoritarianism, over-the-top police antics, and militarism of indepat Feb 2014 #79
It's a re-tread. Ikonoklast Feb 2014 #89
And I suppose you're one of the few left that believe that the popo are springchick Feb 2014 #35
I'll bet in another context you sound off about "nanny state" issues Arugula Latte Feb 2014 #40
wow SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2014 #34
She did NOT have to id herself until she was arrested. If she was arrested for something, then had uppityperson Feb 2014 #43
Lol JJChambers Feb 2014 #50
that is the law. She does not have to id herself until arrested. Can not be arrested for not IDing uppityperson Feb 2014 #52
Garbage Melissa G Feb 2014 #53
Are you a cop? Looks like you made up a couple things there. Kingofalldems Feb 2014 #55
Papers, please? Enthusiast Feb 2014 #47
Thank you. "Ridiculous" is a good word. woo me with science Feb 2014 #21
She was ticketed for jaywalking. Gore1FL Feb 2014 #29
She was? kcr Feb 2014 #69
She probably wouldn't have Gore1FL Feb 2014 #87
What video did you watch? spooky3 Feb 2014 #61
I'm guessing you probably hate bicyclists as much as you hate kestrel91316 Feb 2014 #75
We really need to rethink this cop thingy here in America madokie Feb 2014 #15
What we need are cops that are more answerable for testilying, and their actions on the force. msanthrope Feb 2014 #16
No doubt madokie Feb 2014 #19
till we see a few, and i mean, several, cops sent to prison for testilying mopinko Feb 2014 #25
I think we should encourage news organizations to publish the chain of command. msanthrope Feb 2014 #33
hmmm. that's interesting. mopinko Feb 2014 #39
Exactly....lots of people profit from and have to cover up police malfeasance. It's time msanthrope Feb 2014 #42
$20 million would by a whole lot of digital cameras. Ikonoklast Feb 2014 #90
And they shouldn't be allowed to lie as part of their job seattledo Feb 2014 #85
Damn Solly Mack Feb 2014 #20
WTF? chrisa Feb 2014 #22
The saddest part about this: Police sexually assaulting you or beating you up is the new normal, and chrisa Feb 2014 #23
+1000. kath Feb 2014 #26
K&R 1000 times KauaiK Feb 2014 #37
i'll be jaywalking in austin today alato Feb 2014 #24
Good luck with all that. nt awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #49
thanks for the support, comrade alato Feb 2014 #91
Ever since Acevedo took over APD has acted like storm troopers. hobbit709 Feb 2014 #27
Austin Police Chief Responds to Arresting Woman for Jaywalking Garion_55 Feb 2014 #28
... AzDar Feb 2014 #38
The first one, exactly. Catch 22 there. uppityperson Feb 2014 #44
Perfect. Iggo Feb 2014 #63
W...T...F... SoapBox Feb 2014 #31
Very definition of a victimless so-called "crime." LibDemAlways Feb 2014 #32
I've been wondering what I could say that wasn't already said. Savannahmann Feb 2014 #36
Or made to go see the cop's band Tom Ripley Feb 2014 #41
This fucking Acevedo has got to go! Enthusiast Feb 2014 #45
PIG! Dawson Leery Feb 2014 #48
kick Liberal_in_LA Feb 2014 #54
This is why you stop and think about what you're going to say before you say it mythology Feb 2014 #60
Are you aware that the jogger was wearing earphones so she didn't hear him call out behind her? pnwmom Feb 2014 #67
Sooner or later Aerows Feb 2014 #62
Yeah, in Texas sexual assaults by police are all too common. pnwmom Feb 2014 #65
Un.. fukking .. believable! ananda Feb 2014 #70
So . . . Brigid Feb 2014 #73
"At least our cops aren't raping jaywalkers!" gollygee Feb 2014 #74
The US Department of Justice needs to investigate underthematrix Feb 2014 #77
What an utterly disgusting statement tandot Feb 2014 #76
+100000 woo me with science Feb 2014 #88
he should be fired warrior1 Feb 2014 #82
I saw this movie before... dogknob Feb 2014 #83
......yet. WinkyDink Feb 2014 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Austin police chief says ...»Reply #66