Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What the hell is Barack Obama's presidency for? [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)24. LOL!
"Guess who said this? '...in fact its a Republican idea and Governor Romney at the beginning...'"
Ooh, Obama said something political. LOL!
"Guess who" did this:
In Fall 2005, the House and Senate each passed health care insurance reform bills. The legislature made a number of changes to Governor Romney's original proposal, including expanding MassHealth (Medicaid and SCHIP) coverage to low-income children and restoring funding for public health programs. The most controversial change was the addition of a provision which requires firms with 11 or more workers that do not provide "fair and reasonable" health coverage to their workers to pay an annual penalty. This contribution, initially $295 annually per worker, is intended to equalize the free care pool charges imposed on employers who do and do not cover their workers.
On April 12, 2006, Governor Romney signed the health legislation.[19] He vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[20] He vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[21] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform#Legislation
On April 12, 2006, Governor Romney signed the health legislation.[19] He vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[20] He vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[21] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform#Legislation
Mitt Romney health care vetoes overturned by Massachusetts House (Mitt Romney Archive, 2006)
By The Republican Newsroom
This story from The Republicans archive is part of our look back at Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romneys years in Massachusetts politics: as Senate candidate, gubernatorial candidate and governor. It was published on April 26, 2006.
By The Associated Press
BOSTON Sending a sharp rebuke to Gov. W. Mitt Romney, House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly yesterday to overturn his vetoes to the state's landmark health-care law, including the controversial $295 fee on businesses that don't offer insurance.
The predominantly Democratic House broke from debate of the state budget to begin the override process, first voting to restore a portion of the law guaranteeing dental benefits to Medicaid recipients.
The House overrides had been expected, and Senate President Robert Travaglini said yesterday that he expects the Senate will override all eight of Romney's vetoes. The Republican governor's spokesman said the differences were not essential to the larger goal of health care coverage.
- more -
http://www.masslive.com/mitt-romney-archive/index.ssf/2012/04/gov_mitt_romney_health_care_ve.html
By The Republican Newsroom
This story from The Republicans archive is part of our look back at Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romneys years in Massachusetts politics: as Senate candidate, gubernatorial candidate and governor. It was published on April 26, 2006.
By The Associated Press
BOSTON Sending a sharp rebuke to Gov. W. Mitt Romney, House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly yesterday to overturn his vetoes to the state's landmark health-care law, including the controversial $295 fee on businesses that don't offer insurance.
The predominantly Democratic House broke from debate of the state budget to begin the override process, first voting to restore a portion of the law guaranteeing dental benefits to Medicaid recipients.
The House overrides had been expected, and Senate President Robert Travaglini said yesterday that he expects the Senate will override all eight of Romney's vetoes. The Republican governor's spokesman said the differences were not essential to the larger goal of health care coverage.
- more -
http://www.masslive.com/mitt-romney-archive/index.ssf/2012/04/gov_mitt_romney_health_care_ve.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Same as the British Prime Minister position. Blair has become immensely richer. It's The Way.
WinkyDink
Feb 2014
#34
I heard "gold or lead" about the proposition given to new federalis in Mexico by the drug cartels
yurbud
Mar 2014
#110
If the Republican Party (as a brand) is dying it has nothing to do with the Democrats.
Boomerproud
Feb 2014
#68
And appointed many of them to positions of power which the people threw them out of.
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#94
What are you talking about? They were dead in 2006 and 2008. Now they're in charge again
Doctor_J
Feb 2014
#75
if by that you mean that it has moved the party Tea Bagger-right...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2014
#114
Don't you think if Obama thought he could get universal healthcare or Medicare for all passed
kelliekat44
Feb 2014
#27
Yes, they blamed your insurance company, never said you don't deserve relief.
uppityperson
Feb 2014
#66
I still don't agree. I blame politicians taking massive cash from insurance companies
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#82
My health insurance premiums raised every yr, as did deductibles and copays, until the ACA kicked in
uppityperson
Feb 2014
#83
both parties are taking too much corporate cash, it is corrupting public policy
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#88
that's why we need pragmatic voices, not conservative ideas from 1980 squating in space
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#97
Agree - Obama/Democratic Party hasn't built brand trust, middle class left behind
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#60
We win the initial conflict in most wars we fight but then we try to rebuild the nations ...
spin
Feb 2014
#80
nope, the original plan they had was going to be worse, they switched this year, best they could do
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#41
Did you seek an alternative to your corporate plan on the healthcare.gov website? n/t
Tanuki
Feb 2014
#71
I don't own the company where I work which is rather huge with many thousands of employees - however
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#117
Exactly!! Using the financial meltdown as excuse to NOT do healthcare reform
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#4
ACA for one. To hasten the downfall of the repubs is another. Endorse marriage equality.
uppityperson
Feb 2014
#5
Oh give it a rest. Let's see health care reform, civil rights reform, Lily ledbetter act, climate
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#6
First and foremost is was to protect the Banksters from prosecution. Then is was to advance the
Vincardog
Feb 2014
#8
if i had a penny for every bitter clown who insists everyone who disagrees with them is a paid
dionysus
Mar 2014
#113
Guess who said this? "...in fact it’s a Republican idea and Governor Romney at the beginning..."
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#22
I don't understand your point - are you saying Obama lied about health care? Romney signed it right?
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#31
Thank you. I also agree I am very clear. Unfortunately, I can't offer you the same complement. -nt
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#47
I don't think I can vote for Obama in 2016, sorry. I just can't. Does that make me a hater?
Electric Monk
Feb 2014
#56
I'm tyring to put his campaign promises and assertions about NAFTA and spying
pragmatic_dem
Feb 2014
#73
The same Lyndon Johnson that gave us the worst conflict in American history?
Drunken Irishman
Feb 2014
#35
To get formerly sane Dems to support union-busting, Heritage Care, torture, KXL, TPP
Doctor_J
Feb 2014
#38
The writer should have made note why Johnson didn't run for re-election in 1968
BumRushDaShow
Feb 2014
#62
It's for asking whether or not the Obama presidency is any use to the left wing
sibelian
Mar 2014
#120
Just like anyother Presidents Job, kicking the can down the road for the 1%
wocaonimabi
Feb 2014
#102
To ensure that the powerful remain in power and to expand that power wherever possible.
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#106
He could have answered his own question if he looked at the monthly jobs chart. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#115