HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Mass objectification is a... » Reply #47

Response to rrneck (Reply #44)

Mon Feb 24, 2014, 01:15 AM

47. It's all true, of course, but applied wrong. Think of "sonder."

Sonder n. the realization that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own—populated with their own ambitions, friends, routines, worries and inherited craziness—an epic story that continues invisibly around you like an anthill sprawling deep underground, with elaborate passageways to thousands of other lives that you’ll never know existed, in which you might appear only once, as an extra sipping coffee in the background, as a blur of traffic passing on the highway, as a lighted window at dusk.


How can we possibly think that an interconnected world such as ours with all of its glorious industrial magic, stuff so beyond each one of us but applied through the efforts of many, is anything but a truly connected and truly integrated society?

The whole alienation thing only applies to someone from a pre-industrial society watching as industry comes up around them and trying to make sense of it all. The reality is that we as a species are probably more social, more connected, less alienated than any other species on the planet.

Also, to get back to what you were saying, that (buying what we use, buying what we thinkg) is actually one of the critiques of Marx's theory of alienation and commodity fetishism. What if Marxism itself becomes a commodity fetish to the point of alienating others. Think about that one for a bit (yeah, once a philosophy becomes a caricature of its critique it sort of invalidates itself).

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 55 replies Author Time Post
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 OP
mzteris Feb 2014 #1
Sarah Ibarruri Feb 2014 #6
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #38
Sarah Ibarruri Feb 2014 #43
mzteris Feb 2014 #45
Sarah Ibarruri Feb 2014 #46
redqueen Feb 2014 #21
Rex Feb 2014 #2
Scootaloo Feb 2014 #4
Rex Feb 2014 #5
BainsBane Feb 2014 #3
Sarah Ibarruri Feb 2014 #7
El_Johns Feb 2014 #8
rrneck Feb 2014 #9
El_Johns Feb 2014 #11
rrneck Feb 2014 #12
El_Johns Feb 2014 #13
rrneck Feb 2014 #14
El_Johns Feb 2014 #15
rrneck Feb 2014 #18
El_Johns Feb 2014 #19
rrneck Feb 2014 #20
El_Johns Feb 2014 #22
rrneck Feb 2014 #23
El_Johns Feb 2014 #24
rrneck Feb 2014 #25
The Straight Story Feb 2014 #27
El_Johns Feb 2014 #29
The Straight Story Feb 2014 #30
El_Johns Feb 2014 #31
The Straight Story Feb 2014 #32
El_Johns Feb 2014 #33
joshcryer Feb 2014 #41
rrneck Feb 2014 #44
LineLineLineLineNew Reply It's all true, of course, but applied wrong. Think of "sonder."
joshcryer Feb 2014 #47
Zorra Feb 2014 #10
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #35
Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #16
TBF Feb 2014 #17
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #36
TBF Feb 2014 #48
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #53
joshcryer Feb 2014 #26
Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #28
joshcryer Feb 2014 #39
whistler162 Feb 2014 #34
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #37
scarletwoman Feb 2014 #40
flvegan Feb 2014 #42
TBF Feb 2014 #49
stevenleser Feb 2014 #50
Adrahil Feb 2014 #51
Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2014 #52
socialist_n_TN Feb 2014 #54
Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2014 #55
Please login to view edit histories.